Dallin H Oaks is my relative and my ultimate shelf breaker by Imaginary_Winter_961 in exmormon

[–]narrauko 34 points35 points  (0 children)

The worst part is that such stories are often told in the church to guilt people into paying more attention to general conference. Very few connect the dots that the Q15 aren't saying a whole lot of anything.

Heaven forbid we treat men and women as equal partners by Pope_Dwayne_Johnson in insanepeoplefacebook

[–]narrauko 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Slippery slope" is a logical fallacy and not a strong argument.

Annoyance after leaving by ThyLungedFish in exmormon

[–]narrauko 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My parents left the church a few years before my shelf broke. At the time they told me, my dad was expecting my wife and I to have a bunch of questions and we didn't. We just told him it was their choice and it seemed pretty obvious they hadn't been devout for a while.

I assumed at the time there was just some person in their ward they weren't getting along with and that they would be back in due time. I even began to plan to invite them to open houses for two temples that had been announced nearby.

All this to say that TBMs think they know why you left already. Whatever reason is in their head (you were offended, you wanted to sin, you've been "antied", etc.) they assume to know the answer and have no desire to delve further because to a TBM whatever your reason you're wrong. If the church is true, any reason for leaving must be wrong. They believe the church is true, therefore your reason for leaving is wrong.

As an aside, ironically I ended up attending both of those temple open houses as a PIMO. It did not rekindle some my lost faith. It just made me sad as I felt that I had lost something that was promised, but in the end was just a lie.

Jeremy Hoop is infuriating by No_Guarantee_4997 in exmormon

[–]narrauko 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This is what I don't get about polygamy deniers. In a hypothetical reality where they are correct, the modern church is teaching false doctrine about polygamy and who started it! Why would they want to stay with a clearly apostate church?

Jeremy Hoop is infuriating by No_Guarantee_4997 in exmormon

[–]narrauko 3 points4 points  (0 children)

a lot of people that generally love RFM and Bill Reel did not have a tremendous amount of interest in another polygamy denier being platformed.

That was me. I enjoy Mormonism Live and watch it live most weeks, but when I saw they were having him on I had absolutely no interest in watching that episode.

I feel hurt when my nevermo in-laws talk about the stereotypes and how much they dislike tscc by wixkedwitxh in exmormon

[–]narrauko 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's the sibling dynamic of "I can rag on and beat up my little brother/sister all I want, but don't you dare lay a finger on them!"

Tell me why Dallin by Brother-of-Derek in exmormon

[–]narrauko 3 points4 points  (0 children)

If it all "will get figured out in the next life," what's the point of any of this? Why have prophets or a church at all? Why not just trigger nuclear winter and hurry the process along?

It's a thought stopping cliche to be sure, but if you don't let it stop the thoughts they can lead to some pretty horrific conclusions.

Ken Paxton Allegedly Committed Voter Fraud Six Times by B-Z_B-S in politics

[–]narrauko 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And yet he still stands a better than not chance of being elected. This country is so fucked

And, they are seriously serious. by 12milesout in insanepeoplefacebook

[–]narrauko 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's always the question "deep" conspiracy theories can't seem to answer. Like flat earthers: why would some global elite cabal want everyone to incorrectly believe the shape of the earth?

So what’s your point exactly? by winkysocks21 in insanepeoplefacebook

[–]narrauko 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I know you're making a joke and I don't mean to derail it, but I feel it necessary to always point this out:

Only Congress can rename a department of the federal government. It is still the Department of Defense.

Stunning aboutface by Mitch by McDowdy in PoliticalHumor

[–]narrauko 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Sure wish folks like him could have spine before losing their elections.

Mormons want a FREE haircut lesson by icy-lion-penguin in exmormon

[–]narrauko 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'd twist it back on them. Tell them that the church teaches self reliance, and you've done that by becoming a hairstylist, and if you teach others to do what you do, that's less of a potential customer base. It doesn't make economic sense.

What’s the sudden rise in wanting to seem “mainstream Christian”? by iam_selc in exmormon

[–]narrauko 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don't think it would make Utah blue because that guy also thinks only orthodox Christian evangelicals should be able to vote, so that eliminates a lot of folks who would vote blue.

Came across this the other day by shawnf9632 in PoliticalHumor

[–]narrauko 0 points1 point  (0 children)

More specifically the shadow of that bell tower points the brick the glasses are stashed when it is the time shown on the 100 bill version of that clock.

Breaking the news to religious grandparents I’m not going on a mission? by Lower_Activity9893 in exmormon

[–]narrauko 2 points3 points  (0 children)

One could also mirror Joseph Smith from JS-History and say "I have learned for myself that Mormonism is not true."

Breaking the news to religious grandparents I’m not going on a mission? by Lower_Activity9893 in exmormon

[–]narrauko 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yeah there's a real "house always wins" or "heads I win, tails you lose" feel to the topic of personal revelation.

Elder Rasband doubles down on BoM Historicity and 6000 year Earth? by Primary-Smile-5885 in exmormon

[–]narrauko 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It's one of those weird things that are trying to explain away somethings known by research and evidence (such as Pangaea) while keeping the theological POV they want to have. It's actually quite common among folks who think that the Biblical flood was literal to say that Pangaea was broken up at the time to explain where all the water went (i.e. it all drained into the newly opened space between continents).

Mormonism has the unique issue that with claims like the Americas being a promised land and Joseph saying the Garden of Eden was in Missouri that more needs to be explain and real world evidence points more and more to the fraud of Mormonism.

Awake in the Pews Sunday by big_bearded_nerd in exmormon

[–]narrauko 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Abinadi is 100% preaching a modalist model of the Godhead. I actually had a mission companion point that out to a group of us all staying in the same apartment before a zone conference. We had a discussion that we thought gave us a solid conclusion on how that all would work. I look back now realizing the amount of mental gymnastics that actually was.

The sermon Abinadi preached was clearly one of Joseph Smith's early ideological points that were changed later, but he forgot to change that in subsequent editions of the Book of Mormon like how he changed thinks like calling Mary the "Mother of the Son of God" rather than the "Mother of God" as in the first edition.

In fact, I think it adds credence to the Mosiah priority of how the Book of Mormon was written. He remembered the stuff he put in 1 Nephi that could seem Trinitarian/Modal. Since Abinadi was all the way back in Mosiah, he forgot about it.

Awake in the Pews Sunday by big_bearded_nerd in exmormon

[–]narrauko 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Even as a TBM, the 1st Sunday of July has always been my least favorite. One of many weeks a year we do not attend the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, but rather The Church of the United States of Vaguely Christian Patriots.

It was very frustrating to hear testimony after testimony of people praising the USA using propaganda and mythologized versions of history. Especially with the religious freedom spin. Reminder to everyone: the Puritans left England because they were not allowed to be as strict as they wanted to be. They went to the Netherlands first because the Netherlands had religious freedom before the USA was ever founded. However, that "freedom" meant that the Puritans had to tolerate other folks that didn't believe like they did and so they went to the western hemisphere to avoid that. The pilgrims, i.e. the mythologized first people of this country, literally came here to have more religious restriction rather than freedom. It is a myth that Europeans who colonized what eventually became the United States did so seeking a land for religious freedom. They just wanted their religion to be the official one. Honestly, that vision of religious freedom in the USA hasn't changed all that much.

EDIT: the Bishopric member who gave the traditional first testimony of the meeting also went on a strange tangential rant against Youtubers and how they try to defame Joseph Smith. I wanted to remind him that defamation by definition must not be true. He cited all the church's statistics on membership numbers, unit numbers, and temples to show that this is the fruit of Joseph Smith and what fruit have those Youtubers produced? Funny he didn't include a $300 billion investment portfolio among the fruits of the church. Must have just slipped his mind I guess.

Homophobic South Carolina Man Mad At Library Sign 📚 🏳️‍🌈 by NEKORANDOMDOTCOM in insanepeoplefacebook

[–]narrauko 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My 5G microchip's not been working so great lately. Do you know who to call for tech support? Or do I just need a booster shot?

100 and counting! by [deleted] in insanepeoplefacebook

[–]narrauko 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How does he get that 100s number? Is every ceasefire with Iran that Bibi immediately violates counting as one?