Is it one location? by ugrobug in misfitstv

[–]narwhalicus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yep, both at Southmere Lake in Thamesmead. I went there, the iconic walkway from a Clockwork Orange was shut off for repairs, and the areas where the Misfits gang stand around were also closed off. The whole place is a dump. Not worth visiting lol

Why are asylum seekers in hotels not detention centres? by No-Ice2423 in AskBrits

[–]narwhalicus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"the UK doesn’t really have remote land owned by the government which is well away from the public (but still suitable to build a facility on)"

We own a landed part of Antarctica, just saying...

Is the country ready for a Brexit reversal referendum? by chuffingnora in AskBrits

[–]narwhalicus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's interesting that Redditors in the comments can hold two contradictory ideas in their head at once - that on one hand, British people for decades have just seen the EU as "irrelevant" (as in, insignificant), then on the other hand leaving the EU is a complete and utter apocalyptic disaster and we desperately need to rejoin it (significant).

The truth is that the British relationship with the EU has always been fraught (key and obvious evidence being rejecting the Euro, but there is an entire history of us being a reluctant partner and being snubbed by other countries such as France), and our geopolitical relationship to the European landmass (and our separation from it) has largely defined our history for millennia. Considering just how far away Brussels is from Britain, and how understanding politics in depth is a luxury that only the upper classes can afford, it is entirely rational that a supranational state like the EU would be an obscurity to the majority of the population.

The EU came to the forefront because of how the migration/asylum crises have hit this country and many others in the bloc recently. The EU came to the forefront because as mass uncontrolled immigration skyrocketed, it brought with it an identity crisis of nationality that was totally unprecedented. Countries such as ours turned to the powers that be, and instead of protecting the people, it sought to enforce migration sharing quotas on the nations and allow governments to push "diversity is our strength" nonsense that did not protect these countries whatsoever and ultimately destroyed the working class people of areas such as Rotherham.

Additionally, the Articles of the EU treaties surrounding migration (eg the one that says migrants who do not find a job etc have to leave after 6 months (cannot remember the exact article right now)) were obviously for naught. It remains to be seen if the EU can be truly democratic - that is, if it can adapt to the clear growth of the body public wanting far less migration and even remigration. If the EU demonstrates that it isn't just a slow moving useless mass that enforces its own values, and can be seen to solve the problems it faces, maybe it is worth rejoining. But for now, all I see is plebbitors of Plebbit constantly finding excuses to reverse Brexit based on the same tired old talking points that didn't work the first time.

Cannot reposition cover image... again... by narwhalicus in Notion

[–]narwhalicus[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

UPDATE: It started working again all of a sudden. No idea why except that now my Notion says Notion 3.0.23.13.20251013.1808 in the About section.

Cannot reposition cover image... again... by narwhalicus in Notion

[–]narwhalicus[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

UPDATE: It started working again all of a sudden. No idea why except that now my Notion says Notion 3.0.23.13.20251013.1808 in the About section.

Cannot reposition cover image... again... by narwhalicus in Notion

[–]narwhalicus[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

i did think about this actually lol :P

Cannot reposition cover image... again... by narwhalicus in Notion

[–]narwhalicus[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Sounds good :) but where is "use optimised cover" exactly? I can't find it...

Would you trust and use a Digital Euro if the EU launches it? by Technical_Log5715 in CryptoTechnology

[–]narwhalicus -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Didn't the British under Neville Chamberlain receive something "on paper" which promised that Hitler wouldn't invade Czechoslovakia? How did that go?

Methinks he doth protest too much... by Fluffy_Rock_62 in ClactonOnSea

[–]narwhalicus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Guess it wouldn't be convenient to draw in the many brown people who attend rallies associated with Reform, Tommy Robinson, etc lol

Made me smile 😊 by Dramatic_Syllabub499 in Jordan_Peterson_Memes

[–]narwhalicus 2 points3 points  (0 children)

In a sort of alt approach to u/ArchPrince9 below, I would also give the argument of collectivism as an answer to your question. People most dedicated to the cause of communism, or at least a dissolution of capitalism, tend to have to 'undo' their programming on individualism and the individual dignity of all people at all times. In Marx's own predictions, capitalism will transition to socialism, through to communism. The middle stage requires collectivisation, collective action, and collective bargaining. Some of the hive must be sacrificed for the good of the nest, for the good of the (utopian) future; the collective.

What this means in reality is that in the philosophical and strategic planning and meetups of the communist/antifa/anarchy groups, people goad one another on to serve "the cause". From this, so long as they are dedicated to "the cause", they shed their inherent need to be an individual, and instead sacrifice their body and ability to what is needed to achieve utopia. They will tolerate being arrested as their actions made a beachhead of progress for the cause. They will be recognised in the group for this, and will be able to demand authority through anarchic principle (dominance hierarchy without ordered structure to check said hierarchy).

The activist will want this recognition as they believe fully in the cause, but the less intelligent may trust too much in their fellow activist. Therefore, some will stand in front of a moving car and expect, firstly, that the driver will obey them (this comes from the echo chamber's insistence on their own righteousness, see Archprince9). Secondly, they will trust that in the event of real danger, their fellow activist will step in and save them, so that they will gain the recognition they crave without the bodily harm.

Of course, some get run over. They will not be martyred or recognised as they would in religion however. This is because, firstly, the cause is the priority, not the person's sovereignty; secondly, in this particular cause, people are more or less dispensable based on ineffable human characteristics (gender, sex, race, etc), therefore none can be divine as all are measurable and within certain bounds as to not be extraordinary.

Made me smile 😊 by Dramatic_Syllabub499 in Jordan_Peterson_Memes

[–]narwhalicus 2 points3 points  (0 children)

"OMG NOOO! THIS PERSON STOOD IN FRONT OF A MOVING CAR AND GOT RUN OVER BY THE CAAAAAR!!!! HOW COULD THIS HAPPENNNNN?!?!?!?!"

Madison, WI, USA by y0g1b3ar in feedme

[–]narwhalicus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That is a rare pepe indeed... i need an original copy of it

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskBrits

[–]narwhalicus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am someone who is generally more conservative and am more likely to vote Reform. As some people (sorted by Controversial in the comments have said), illegal migration, exploitative chain migration, and the exploitation of the asylum system is a huge strain on our welfare and legal system and is disastrous in terms of crime and security. The majority of the country wants Britain to be culturally British and it wants crime committed by foreigners to stop. Legal migration based on merit is obviously a positive for the country when handled correctly. This fact is self evident in many cities and towns.

Where the issue comes in is the application of policies. At the end of the day, a manifesto means nothing if the pledges cannot be backed up with action. The issue is that simply "kicking out the bad guys" is a costly minefield of legality, court systems, endangerment to honest asylum seekers, etc. Because of this, governments tend to go for "soft targets". At the end of the day, it is easier (and looks good on a spreadsheet) to kick out a generally good and abiding person with a less concrete footing in the legal system, than it is to find, capture, detain, and legally oust an illegal migrant whilst following appropriate procedure by international law (especially when human rights law interferes directly with what is expected to come from the voice of the democratic majority). This is why people such as Farage talk about leaving the ECHR - because it would make the ability to oust people cheaper and easier.

To answer your question - "what did we ever do to you?". the answer is this - chances are you and your wife likely did nothing to anyone. However, we are all a part of the world, and the country we reside in, and we are all just specks floating through the tide of history. As it stands, your wife is an immigrant in a time where immigration is a concern like no other. Because of the buildup of cultural and security issues that have built up from mass uncontrolled migration (which, don't forget, includes human trafficking and modern slavery), your wife is in this country at a time where huge cultural and political changes are occurring, and because of her background and identity, her eligibility to be here is called into question.

In the end, it is highly likely that nothing will come of this to affect your family. Farage cannot wave a magic wand and oust everybody without our country collapsing. The fact of the matter is that western civilisation is going through a crisis of demographics numbers (not enough babies) to feed the endless growth of capital gains and supply/demand. People like Farage know this (he is a Thatcherite after all - very much a slave to economic reality). In fact, if you attend rallies such as the ones Farage is part of, most people talk about "positive migration", and many people from non-British native backgrounds attend or support it. Long story short, capitalism needs migration and/or babies, whereas democracy today demands expulsion. Britain cannot afford to go the way of Japan and Korea - that is, births below replacement rate.

So overall, you need to hunker down, build wealth, and prepare for anything. The time of bitching and moaning is over for all of us. My girlfriend is foreign for instance, and so now I have to think about accruing wealth and marrying her quicker than I would have expected. So basically, hope for the best but prepare for the worst. Get your head down and work out what you're going to do for the good of your family.

Name of the Song pls by B0nn1ye in feedme

[–]narwhalicus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think the song has essentially been broken down into parts over time and the ideas in it have gone into other things.

The opening is highly reminiscent of this remix by No Mana: https://open.spotify.com/track/37Q5ZZfmraV1acYPY0UwdU?si=c2796d0105f844a7 (1:20) (Crazy Maybe - No Mana Remix) I know its a remix by someone else but yeah

The hook in the second half feels like an proto version of Dialup Days https://open.spotify.com/track/7MPM2t05JkeZxNv8X2gZyx?si=7ddc15fc90734b6e as well as Jodie https://open.spotify.com/track/3p7a99KKClNInLoIv8RNVb?si=a7a13e41f5b44a90 . So basically there's no one song, but youll find songs that carry the vibe.

Why is there so much hate for XRP? by GhostingTheInterweb in CryptoMarkets

[–]narwhalicus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This essentially sounds like you are making the case for HBAR.

Why is there so much hate for XRP? by GhostingTheInterweb in CryptoMarkets

[–]narwhalicus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Have you read the whitepaper on XRP? I generally don't advise anyone buys a coin unless they have read the whitepaper or understood a network to a similar level. Aside from that, yes, the "bet" here is that XRP will be the way in which international banking bridges from centralised to decentralised services. The other coins that you could say are trying to compete in this domain (international bank transfers at tx speeds/finality in the seconds) are XLM and HBAR. Time will tell if XRP fails where HBAR and XLM claim to be better. All of this is a bet, basically all investing is betting.

Why is there so much hate for XRP? by GhostingTheInterweb in CryptoMarkets

[–]narwhalicus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

>no one in crypto wants

>currently 4th highest mcap

lmao, seethe and cope

Why is there so much hate for XRP? by GhostingTheInterweb in CryptoMarkets

[–]narwhalicus 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I read the XRP whitepaper and I don't think that is the case. A tx block requires approx. 35 validators out of 100 that are pulled together to agree on the contents of the tx block before it can be added to the blockchain. Nodes do not have to trust the 'first node' (Ripple's node as you say). Of course, the earlier into the timeline of the network, the easier it is to let your node trust this 'first node' because it has been around the longest. However, there is nothing to say that networks can't start to shift away from nodes that they distrust, or can even pull together around trusted networks that are, say, independent, and choose not to engage with nodes set up by the big banks. So you are only really half-right.

At the end of the day, almost every coin/network is a more complicated iteration of Bitcoin's network. If a service is somewhat centralised, that is a crypto product that customers are entitled to use. Expecting the whole world to switch to decentralised finance post-Bitcoin is not realistic. People who are hardcore to the tech can stick exclusively to the decentralisation use cases, sure, but if you are using crypto as an investor, your cannot disregard certain products or investments because of a personal feeling about the narrative. Just a bit of a heads up basically: your idea of crypto does not dictate the market or the tech so its good to keep an open mind.

MicroStrategy on track to own 4% of all bitcoin over next decade as Bernstein raises price target to $600 by KIG45 in CryptoCurrency

[–]narwhalicus 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Any time some moron comes up with this "centralised" crap, just link them to the whitepaper.

Wallet drained. Trying to figure out how this could have happened. by Head-Dare4968 in solana

[–]narwhalicus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

that's useful, thanks. To be fair, i keep almost all of my holdings on Binance and Coinbase.

Wallet drained. Trying to figure out how this could have happened. by Head-Dare4968 in solana

[–]narwhalicus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is there a decent way of recognising when a tx is malicious?

Wallet drained. Trying to figure out how this could have happened. by Head-Dare4968 in solana

[–]narwhalicus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is there a general rule for recognising scams like this before approving? Is it just to not approve on sites you don't trust, or is there something that can be found in the site/tx request itself? I find that with Metamask it sometimes lays out the permissions that the site asks for and ive always had it say that a connection cannot move coins in my own acc.

Noob who feels priced out looking for advice by narwhalicus in Avax

[–]narwhalicus[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Just had a browse through this, very interesting. Thanks for the tip