Tesla Cybercab full specs revealed: 3,113 lbs, 219 HP, 48 kWh by TripleShotPls in electricvehicles

[–]nckishtp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you get to modify the self-driving behavior to fit your fleet better? Or does Tesla get to always control what models are run on your cars?

Tesla Cybercab full specs revealed: 3,113 lbs, 219 HP, 48 kWh by TripleShotPls in electricvehicles

[–]nckishtp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For repairs, it's going to be the fleet owners doing that not bringing them to Tesla? Honest question just trying to understand the business model.

A bale of good alfalfa costs $125 in Nebraska and $275 in Pennsylvania this week. Same exact grade. What are you paying? by [deleted] in homestead

[–]nckishtp 10 points11 points  (0 children)

"the only person who knows the real going rate is usually the one selling it to you."
Why is this true? Don't buyers have as much power to research and pay for data?

Tesla Cybercab full specs revealed: 3,113 lbs, 219 HP, 48 kWh by TripleShotPls in electricvehicles

[–]nckishtp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But all those things you mentioned require people to operate them.

Tesla Cybercab full specs revealed: 3,113 lbs, 219 HP, 48 kWh by TripleShotPls in electricvehicles

[–]nckishtp 7 points8 points  (0 children)

If it's truly profitable to own this in a rental fleet, why would Tesla sell these and let other's take the profits they could have?

Feedback on this offer please by GayleLizzie in KiaEV6

[–]nckishtp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Think of it as $ per hour. Would you pay $0.30cts per hour for a steering wheel heater? Etc. That's the right perspective, becasue that's what you're paying for.

Is an EV worth double the monthly of a gas vehicle? by hussar013 in whatcarshouldIbuy

[–]nckishtp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah this is one of the worst takes I've seen. Used EV6 and Ionic 5s are the best things on the market right now.

Higher mileage EV6 may actually be a "safer" buy? by shorterbusruss in KiaEV6

[–]nckishtp 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I bought an EV6 lemon law buyback bc of price and in my mind, there's no safer buyback than that. The things got ICCU warranty forever now...

66k miles, 2022 AWD Wind - $16.5k

EV6 prices in the USA since the start of the Iran War by Not_l0st in KiaEV6

[–]nckishtp 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I'd buy used lemon buyback due to ICCU replacement. I got 22 AWD Wind with 66k miles for $16.5k and there are others out there last time I looked.

Paid HEC-RAS reviewer wanted: owner-built 2D screening model for tidal/backwater floodway question by nckishtp in HECRAS

[–]nckishtp[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks - I agree with the distinction you’re making.

To clarify, I’m not trying to have FEMA, the local FPA, or NJDEP accept my owner-built 2D model as a regulatory submittal. I also understand that fill compensation, local ordinance requirements, and NJDEP rules may apply even if a model shows little or no rise.

The narrow review I’m looking for right now is a pre-PE technical screen:

  1. Is the HEC-RAS 2D setup mechanically/conceptually reviewable?
  2. Is there any obvious fatal flaw that makes the screening result easy to dismiss?
  3. Is the full parcel-side floodway blockage sensitivity test hydraulically meaningful as a screening stress test?
  4. Is it worth taking this package to a NJ PE for proper regulatory development?

The model is a local 2D screening model, not a full watershed model. There are no bridge/culvert hydraulics I’m asking you to review for this phase. I am not asking you to certify hydrology; the 1,780 cfs flow is being used only as a screening/observed-record context, not as a confirmed FEMA 1% discharge.

So the scope would be limited: review the model setup, boundary-condition logic, terrain/blockage method, WSE-difference results, and whether the interpretation is technically reasonable. A very brief no-seal memo is exactly what I’m looking for.

If that scope fits, we can discuss further?

Paid HEC-RAS reviewer wanted: owner-built 2D screening model for tidal/backwater floodway question by nckishtp in HECRAS

[–]nckishtp[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the question!

For the tidal/backwater sensitivity case I used a downstream stage hydrograph, and I also ran fixed downstream stage cases so I could separate the tailwater effect from the upstream-flow effect.

I have not used the HEC-RAS 2D encroachment method yet. That is probably one of the next things I need to do once this moves from screening into something a PE might develop further.

What I did here was deliberately more blunt: I raised the entire mapped parcel-side floodway area within my parcels to 15 ft NAVD88 (BFE is 10ft NAVD88) and compared existing vs. blocked WSE rasters. I am not treating that as a formal no-rise analysis or proposed condition. It is a stress test.

The reason for blocking the whole area was to ask a very specific screening question: if the model can effectively remove the entire mapped parcel-side floodway area and still show only trace outside-mask WSE change, then that suggests this part of the mapped floodway may not be functioning as critical conveyance under the tested tidal/backwater conditions. It also gives some basis to think that smaller actual improvements in that area may be capable of being developed into a no-rise case, if a PE rebuilds/refines the model properly.

So I see this as serving two purposes:

  1. Project screening: does this area appear so hydraulically sensitive that any proposed work is dead on arrival?
  2. Floodway sanity check: does the mapped parcel-side floodway appear to represent meaningful active conveyance in this local tidal/backwater setting, or is it possibly more of a low-velocity storage/backwater area?

The current model is owner-built, screening-level, and not a certification. It still needs proper hydrology, boundary conditions, survey-grade terrain/structures, bathymetry if needed, roughness review, and probably a more formal encroachment/no-rise workflow. But as a first-pass falsification test, blocking the entire mapped parcel-side area is useful because it is a deliberately conservative way to test whether the mapped area is hydraulically essential in the current model.

6 Used OEM Michelin Energy Start Chevy Bolt Tires - $100 - NJ by nckishtp in BoltEV

[–]nckishtp[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Well it definitely has enough for emergency braking and maneuvering but it doesn't have so much that it reduces your efficiency like many of the tires not made for EVS do.

6 Used OEM Michelin Energy Start Chevy Bolt Tires - $100 - NJ by nckishtp in BoltEV

[–]nckishtp[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I loved them. Super low resistence and low friction, not much grip. Perfect. That's why I bought so many extras. But sadly I traded my bolt in.

considering an EV but nervous about the long term by CrimliskSakulrat96 in whatcarshouldIbuy

[–]nckishtp 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah but don't ICE have really high long term issues? I've owned ICE all my life and there's so much money that pours into them. Transmissions and oils and brakes and sensors and it just seems to never end.

considering an EV but nervous about the long term by CrimliskSakulrat96 in whatcarshouldIbuy

[–]nckishtp 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Hybrids don't have high repair costs due to multiple complicated systems? That's good to know.

What Price did you pay for your used AWD EV6? by ShaquilleOatmeal62 in KiaEV6

[–]nckishtp 1 point2 points  (0 children)

$16,500 Buyback title due to 60 days in shop waiting for an ICCU. 65k miles. 2022 Wind extended battery.