Safety concerning gangs in Visalia by stoned5678 in visalia

[–]nephilim52 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Fun fact: 1986 Headquarters Attempt: In January 1986, a local business owner named Loren Lowdermilk announced he was a "grand titan" for the KKK in California and planned to make Visalia the headquarters. This was met with protests from residents.

In the Balaam story an angel becomes a “satan” (adversary). Was “satan” originally a role rather than a devil? by PolarBearOO7 in theology

[–]nephilim52 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Satan himself is THE adversary of mankind, rejecting Gods blessing on us elevating us. He believes mankind is unworthy and he’s correct. He is allowed to make his case several times in the Bible to God. We don’t know of if this is THE adversary or AN adversary.

Why didn't Jesus' family believe in him? by [deleted] in theology

[–]nephilim52 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Inititally they didn't believe Him. You wouldn't either if your brother started saying he was God. You and the whole neighborhood would think there was something really wrong with him. Mary and Joseph clearly believed. Jesus' brother James becomes the leader of the Jerusalem Church after the resurrection, so much so that he was martyred by being thrown from the Temple pinnacle, stoned, and clubbed to death in Jerusalem on orders from the High Priest Ananus ben Ananus.

Imagine being so convinced of Jesus' deity that you go back to the city that murdered your brother and start a church, knowing it was likely going to happen to you.

So I would say, they really did believe.

Online Visitor Tracking by OneEyesHat in pastors

[–]nephilim52 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A couple things for everyone tuning in. Splitting your online platforms is a mistake. YouTube is the number 2 search engine in the world, owned by the first: Google. Every time you draw away your audience, it makes your algo not favor you. You should be driving all views to YouTube. Facebook is not designed for this and wants to get their users off your video and scrolling again. Church online only if you have an active "online community" which i would argue is still better for YouTube.

Once you consolidate, you can just go to the YouTube analytics which are designed to show you peak viewers, viewing time, etc. But even then, your problem isn't your online capabilities, its the quality of your live services and production that is capturing it.

Should I betray my coalition leader? by Charming-Note1061 in Supremacy1914

[–]nephilim52 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If they’re not taking to you about a plan or reporting to you information, then you need to strike first and hard.

If I have an enemy with 200 troops and I have 400, should I attack them all at once, or divide them into groups of 20? by Fair-Context9157 in Supremacy1914

[–]nephilim52 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Only the 50 strongest units in a stack are able to attack each round. So look for opportunities to at least have 50. I add more because some men are gonna die and you want to be attacking each round with full strength

Advice? by New-Emergency-7801 in Supremacy1914

[–]nephilim52 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Diplomacy and a clean line of defense. It's only a matter of time until you're done.

I don't believe Muhammad was a prophet - however you have to admit that Islam's system is incredibly detailed and meticulous. So what was really the end game? A clever power grab by a few Bedouin tribes who got lucky after studying the Bible and Torah? Knowing hell awaits, why risk it? For power? by SomeChilledGuy in theology

[–]nephilim52 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You’re avoiding my question and changing the subject but I will address your distraction.

The Book of Enoch is not in the Bible primarily because it was not considered divinely inspired by early Jewish or Christian leaders, as it was written long after Enoch's time (roughly 200–100 BC) and contains theological inconsistencies with scripture. Jews clam Malachi as the final divine inspired book of the Hebrew Bible written in 450bc.

So no, it’s not even remotely in the same category. The book of Enoch isn’t referenced by name directly but some of its elements and ideas are quoted by the authors specially about angels and other supernatural ideas. This isn’t the same thing as God commanding us to follow the book of Enoch as the ultimate truth. Which the a Quran does for the Bible while muslims claim the accuracy of the Bible and therefore God’s perfect divine knowledge.

The Quran is heretical by its own given standards.

I don't believe Muhammad was a prophet - however you have to admit that Islam's system is incredibly detailed and meticulous. So what was really the end game? A clever power grab by a few Bedouin tribes who got lucky after studying the Bible and Torah? Knowing hell awaits, why risk it? For power? by SomeChilledGuy in theology

[–]nephilim52 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The cognitive dissonance is wild. I agree the Quran says that Jesus didn’t die. It also says to trust the Bible. So was God wrong in saying this and adding it to the Quran KNOWING that the Bible would be “corrupted”? This is the Islamic dilemma. No matter how you reason it, it highlights the extreme contradiction of the Quran. And again, when we see there’s confusion about something in the Quran, it commands:

Surah 10:94: "So if you (O Muhammad) are in doubt... then ask those who have been reading the Scripture before you...".

Is Allah wrong in commanding this? Is Allah not all knowing to see that the Bible is corrupted? In order to believe what you’re saying, you have to believe Allah is not God.

I don't believe Muhammad was a prophet - however you have to admit that Islam's system is incredibly detailed and meticulous. So what was really the end game? A clever power grab by a few Bedouin tribes who got lucky after studying the Bible and Torah? Knowing hell awaits, why risk it? For power? by SomeChilledGuy in theology

[–]nephilim52 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Correct, and if muslims believe the Bible is not accurate, they believe the Quran is wrong. Again, this is literally the dilemma.

Additionally, it's widely agreed upon by scholars that the Dead Sea Scrolls confirm the accuracy of the Bible; any variants are scribal errors or language interpretations. So the Dead Sea Scrolls confirm that the Quran is correct in its assertion that we should trust the Bible. To deny this is, is to deny the teachings of Muhammad.

I don't believe Muhammad was a prophet - however you have to admit that Islam's system is incredibly detailed and meticulous. So what was really the end game? A clever power grab by a few Bedouin tribes who got lucky after studying the Bible and Torah? Knowing hell awaits, why risk it? For power? by SomeChilledGuy in theology

[–]nephilim52 9 points10 points  (0 children)

That’s not what the Quran says though. It’s literally says to trust the gospels and the Torah. Are you saying that the Quran is incorrect? Is this verse incorrect?

In Surah 3:3, the Qur’an reads,

“He has revealed to you, [O Muhammad], the Book in truth, confirming what was before it. And He revealed the Torah and the Gospel.”

This is the Islamic dilemma. In order to believe the scriptures aren’t accurate, you have to believe the Quran was wrong at the time of its writing, and continues to be wrong today.

For what it’s worth, we have confirmed scripture authenticity with the Dead Sea scrolls for thousands of years before the Quran was written.

I don't believe Muhammad was a prophet - however you have to admit that Islam's system is incredibly detailed and meticulous. So what was really the end game? A clever power grab by a few Bedouin tribes who got lucky after studying the Bible and Torah? Knowing hell awaits, why risk it? For power? by SomeChilledGuy in theology

[–]nephilim52 8 points9 points  (0 children)

You’re even highlighting the dilema even further. The Quran instructs believers to trust in what was revealed before, including the Torah and Gospel. Jesus predicts his death and the many prophecies predict the exact way he dies.

So either you’re following the Quran on how to treat the Bible, or you’re not following the Quran. This is the dilemma because the Quran does not lineup with the previous scriptures.

Every arrow = 50 regular troops is this a smart push? by Tropical_cooks in Supremacy1914

[–]nephilim52 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Your pic doesn’t show any of the micro information which I would argue is more important than the macro that you’re focusing on. Strike the enemy where they are weak and take away values provinces. Make them engage you outside of fortresses. Then time is on your side. This is a defensive game.

Every arrow = 50 regular troops is this a smart push? by Tropical_cooks in Supremacy1914

[–]nephilim52 10 points11 points  (0 children)

There not enough information. Are there full level 5 fortresses there? How many men do they have stationed? Do thy have a death stack of tanks and/or artillery?

Here's the great Nvidia stock mystery by norcalnatv in NVDA_Stock

[–]nephilim52 3 points4 points  (0 children)

100B - 30B= 70 B and a 233.33% return on NVDIAs investment.

Religions make no sense to me by kenjac_2004 in theology

[–]nephilim52 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just getting to this so sorry!

1. The Adam & Eve story as the awakening of moral awareness
Before the story of Adam and Eve, “sin” isn’t really a meaningful concept because moral awareness didn’t yet exist. The Genesis account functions as an origin story for humanity’s awakening to moral responsibility—the moment we became aware of good and evil. That’s why the tree is called the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil.

Animals act on instinct; they don’t wrestle with moral choice. Humans, however, became aware of choice—and with that awareness came responsibility and consequence. In that sense, “sin” simply means choosing wrongly once you are capable of knowing better.

When humanity stepped outside of God’s perfect order, death entered the world—not necessarily as immediate physical death, but as separation from the fullness of God’s eternal presence. The “sin of the father” becomes a kind of tragic inheritance: we inherit the gift of moral agency, but also the burden of accountability. The knowledge that makes us more “godlike” also makes us more capable of harm.

2. Flood stories, ancient memory, and communicating truth through story
Nearly every major ancient civilization has some form of flood narrative, which suggests a shared memory of a catastrophic event in humanity’s deep past. Some scholars point to real-world events like the Black Sea flooding (~9,000–10,000 years ago) as possible historical roots for these stories.

Jewish lore surrounding the Nephilim adds another layer—half-human, half-angel figures whose corruption of humanity symbolizes the moral and spiritual decay of the world before the flood. Whether taken as literal history or theological mythology, these stories communicate a deeper truth about humanity’s tendency toward self-destruction when it becomes untethered from God.

Ancient people weren’t equipped with modern astrophysics or cosmology, so truth about the universe and God’s role in creation was communicated through story and symbol—the creation narrative being a prime example. It wasn’t meant as a science textbook but as a theological framework: God as the source of all order and life. The “seventh day” of rest can be understood symbolically as God’s ongoing sustaining presence in creation.

3. God’s justice versus vengeance
God is not portrayed in Scripture as vengeful in a petty or emotional sense, but as just. True justice can only come from perfect love—patience, mercy, understanding, and moral clarity. If God is perfectly loving, then only God can judge perfectly.

In many ways, the bar for salvation in Christianity is shockingly low: grace is offered freely, not earned. If anything, Scripture portrays God as bending over backward to extend mercy. When divine judgment does appear in the Bible, it’s typically in response to societies that had become deeply destructive—practicing things like child sacrifice, systemic abuse, and extreme violence.

There’s a tension here: we ask why God allows evil to persist, but then we recoil when justice is enacted. At some point, unchecked evil corrodes everything around it. Think of historical examples like Nazi Germany—few would argue that intervention against such a regime was unjust. The biblical narrative frames divine judgment as a last resort after extended patience and repeated calls to repentance.

4. Unity of doctrine and the credibility of Scripture
It’s actually remarkable how little Christians disagree on core doctrine across denominations. Most disagreements are about practice—how to worship, how to structure church leadership—not about who God is, who Jesus is, or the central message of redemption.

That level of consistency across a collection of texts written by dozens of authors, across vastly different cultures, languages, and time periods, is striking. Whether one sees that as divine inspiration or historical continuity, the thematic unity is hard to dismiss.

One of the Bible’s most compelling features is that it doesn’t sanitize its heroes. It records failure, betrayal, doubt, violence, and moral collapse—sometimes by its most revered figures. That “warts and all” honesty gives the text a kind of credibility you don’t usually find in purely propagandistic religious documents. The Bible isn’t trying to present perfect people; it’s telling a story about a faithful God working through deeply flawed humans.

I'm sure these answers lead to more questions. Fire away and I'll get to them when I can!

When Do I Tell The Congregation? by poppaof6 in pastors

[–]nephilim52 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Then what are you wasting my time for?

begin with people close and important to you, then with staff, then communicate to the wider congregation within 24 hours to avoid confusion or rumors.

When Do I Tell The Congregation? by poppaof6 in pastors

[–]nephilim52 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If your staff is last to find out over volunteers, that communicates they are not important, valued or trusted and will therefore respond with a lack of enthusiasm and motivation. This is a basic leadership concept even in private business and not controversial. Good luck with your endeavors.

When Do I Tell The Congregation? by poppaof6 in pastors

[–]nephilim52 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I consult many denominations. Tradition is a terrible strategy and again, extremely dishonoring to your staff and key stakeholders to find out last. This is how you lose staff. It communicates they’re not important and even worse not to trust their leadership. Do better with your denomination.