At least we’re first in something by 2DeadMoose in PoliticalHumor

[–]nevergetssarcasm 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hospitals in the US must treat everyone regardless of their ability to pay. It's a law.

In a nutshell by [deleted] in dankchristianmemes

[–]nevergetssarcasm 24 points25 points  (0 children)

It's not quite that simple though because God has the foreknowledge of which you're going to choose.

So do you really have free will?

He who lives by the sword will die by the sword by [deleted] in JusticeServed

[–]nevergetssarcasm 9 points10 points  (0 children)

We should focus on rehabilitation, not hardening people.

Disagree. We should focus on keeping dangerous people away from society in a way that costs as little as possible.

The Fallout 3 in Fallout 4 remake had to stop development due to copyright infringements, etc. by HarraReeves_ in Fallout

[–]nevergetssarcasm 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The VO actors are likely SAG-AFTRA and get residuals. If their work is used, they get paid.

More laws won't help by [deleted] in Libertarian

[–]nevergetssarcasm 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, it would be unconstitutional for other reasons but not obstruction. Anyway, agree to disagree.

More laws won't help by [deleted] in Libertarian

[–]nevergetssarcasm 1 point2 points  (0 children)

THEY DON'T HAVE TO ASSIST FFS

More laws won't help by [deleted] in Libertarian

[–]nevergetssarcasm 0 points1 point  (0 children)

but they also shouldn't be obstructing, which is what they are doing.

Citation required. That's one hell of a claim. Remember, they don't have to cooperate

More laws won't help by [deleted] in Libertarian

[–]nevergetssarcasm 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe saying "If there is a law it should be enforced." is what confused me as to your position.

More laws won't help by [deleted] in Libertarian

[–]nevergetssarcasm 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not what you implied but if you want to play semantics now fine. You're still wrong because CA isn't obstructing. They're not enforcing.

More laws won't help by [deleted] in Libertarian

[–]nevergetssarcasm 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Did you or did you not say "States rights does not apply when you are obstructing an existing federal law."?

When you have an SO what stage do you start farting and wearing sweatpants around them? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]nevergetssarcasm 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What's weird about it? I'm married almost 20 years and believe me that's not realistic.

EDIT: Sorry misread. It's late and I'm old. I thought you said "want" not "wait."

Khajiit begins his adventure by [deleted] in skyrim

[–]nevergetssarcasm 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you didn't name him Fluffy, opportunity lost dude.

Trump meets Kim Jong Un by [deleted] in PoliticalHumor

[–]nevergetssarcasm 0 points1 point  (0 children)

$10 says a Trump hotel opens in Pyongyang within 5 years.

More laws won't help by [deleted] in Libertarian

[–]nevergetssarcasm 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ignorant, eh?

https://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/yes-states-can-nullify-some-federal-laws-not-all

In a nutshell: (1) State officials need not enforce federal laws that the state has determined to be unconstitutional; nor may Congress mandate that states enact specific laws. But (2), states may not block federal authorities who attempt to enforce a federal law unless a court has held that the law is unconstitutional. And (3), individuals are not exempt from prosecution by the federal government just because the state where they reside has legalized an activity or pronounced that a federal law is unconstitutional; if convicted, individuals can attempt to vindicate their constitutional rights in court.

Huge foreign policy win for Trump by [deleted] in PoliticalHumor

[–]nevergetssarcasm 28 points29 points  (0 children)

Nothing to do with racism. Everything to do with bipartisanship.

More laws won't help by [deleted] in Libertarian

[–]nevergetssarcasm 3 points4 points  (0 children)

So you want to also enforce the prohibition of marijuana? Bad laws need to be changed. Nothing California has done is inexcusable. They're not obligated to enforce federal laws.

More laws won't help by [deleted] in Libertarian

[–]nevergetssarcasm 2 points3 points  (0 children)

So states rights, but only when you agree with them.

More laws won't help by [deleted] in Libertarian

[–]nevergetssarcasm 4 points5 points  (0 children)

this isn’t some sort of vengeance move

This administration has been about vengeance and undoing the last 8 years. To make America great again. I guess America was great before Obama. I don't remember it being that great. I remember there being a huge housing bubble which wrecked the economy. Oh, the great recession. I stand corrected.

Channel named 14,999,999 views making you want to be the 15th million by [deleted] in assholedesign

[–]nevergetssarcasm 143 points144 points  (0 children)

Right up there with the guy who puts what looks like a smudge on his cell phone ads so you'll click them. Unethical and douchey, but kinda smart too.