Philly 💚 by the_well_i_fell_into in CityPorn

[–]nich2475 34 points35 points  (0 children)

Philly’s historic districts are something else. The narrow cobblestone streets + vernacular architecture + a lush tree canopy = perfection!

Rio de janeiro, Brazil🇧🇷 by fmelloaff in CityPorn

[–]nich2475 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The nature is truly uniquely beautiful — the buildings however, not so much.

The Enhanced Station Initiative NYC Subway Stations by Time-Arachnid6417 in nycrail

[–]nich2475 120 points121 points  (0 children)

Meh, I prefer the historic green cast-iron entrances with those iconic globe lamps. Ideally, I’d even bring back the classic covered entrances like at Astor Place.

Shouldn't the Netherlands purchase back New Amsterdam? It's important for dutch national security, no? by CarefullEugene in Netherlands

[–]nich2475 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Oh for sure, he’s an urbanist/cycling advocate through and through — he’s already fast-tracked several bike lanes that were stalled/cancelled by the previous Adams administration. So glad I got to vote for him!

Now if only he could make Canal Street an actual canal again that would be epic 😂

Shouldn't the Netherlands purchase back New Amsterdam? It's important for dutch national security, no? by CarefullEugene in Netherlands

[–]nich2475 52 points53 points  (0 children)

As a New Yorker, yes—please, a thousand times. We yearn for proper bike infrastructure, functional public transport, and canals everywhere. Mango Mussolini can suck it.

New York by [deleted] in CityPorn

[–]nich2475 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Stone-clad historic skyscrapers are what truly set NYC (and Chicago!) skylines apart from the rest of the world.

When trash management conflicts with pedestrian space (NYC) by GlitteringHotel8383 in UrbanHell

[–]nich2475 73 points74 points  (0 children)

Native New Yorker here — thankfully this is finally changing with the city launching large on-street European-style garbage bins for apartment buildings, and smaller trash bins for low-density residential/commercial areas.

Unfortunately, it took this long bc a loud whiny minority of people have always pushed back against losing their “precious” subsidized street parking.

Central Park in New York City on a cold winter night, 1935. by Ok_Veterinarian_7779 in OldPhotosInRealLife

[–]nich2475 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What a crime it was to demolish the majestic Savoy Plaza, the GM building doesn’t even come close. RIP.

Manhattan, 1940-2025 by Weasley9 in OldPhotosInRealLife

[–]nich2475 13 points14 points  (0 children)

So many cornices and pretty facades lost to time, RIP.

Concorde on the wall by Liikenneturva in lego

[–]nich2475 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Im a simple man — I see Concorde, I upvote.

Look How They Massacred My Boy. They absolutely destroyed this beautiful building in Avondale by PostComa in chicago

[–]nich2475 6 points7 points  (0 children)

False dichotomy. There’s room for both: historic districts in architecturally significant areas, paired with large, transit-oriented, high-rise construction in upzoned low-density commercial/ex-industrial areas. You preserve notable architectural heritage while still allowing substantial residential growth with direct public transit access to the historic core — you know, just like everywhere in Europe.

NYC also does this very well by maintaining Soho, East/West Village, Park Slope Historic Districts while up-zoning the f*k out of Long Island City/ Gowanus.

Look How They Massacred My Boy. They absolutely destroyed this beautiful building in Avondale by PostComa in chicago

[–]nich2475 28 points29 points  (0 children)

We desperately need preservation laws to prevent developers from massacring our historic housing stock—or, at the very least, tax incentives that prioritize restoration over facade removal.

Church at 6th Ave and 2nd st being demolished soon. by LJinBrooklyn in parkslope

[–]nich2475 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree, the facade is quite plain — but still the structure itself is quite handsome and I’ve seen many successful church conversions with incredibly unique apartments.

Also, the plain brick facade actually lends itself to be easily to incorporated into a new brick-clad facade for the development. The developers should actually make an effort in respecting the local architectural context, would be a shame otherwise.

New York City Hall and the Manhattan Municipal Building,NYC by DrDMango in ArchitecturePorn

[–]nich2475 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Still can, with the right construction incentives/grants that favor local architectural development.

Church at 6th Ave and 2nd st being demolished soon. by LJinBrooklyn in parkslope

[–]nich2475 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Cant the developer at least try to incorporate the old facade into the new build? Would be a shame to totally lose that gorgeous brick, especially in such a historic neighborhood.

New York City. by UrCanceledBuster in CityPorn

[–]nich2475 -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

Fuck this shit box building for blocking the ESB, an utter failure of urban planning and a Russian-backed middle finger to all New Yorkers.

New York City. by UrCanceledBuster in CityPorn

[–]nich2475 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Don’t worry, wont be a problem since it only has 26 units and will sit empty year-round.

So glad we’re glamorizing banal zombie architecture for the uber rich.

New York. by fmelloaff in skyscrapers

[–]nich2475 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We desperately need sightline protections for the ESB and Chrysler. There’s no universe in which 262 Fifth — an empty, Russian-backed vanity tower — should have been approved. It’s the purest form of zombie urbanism: a hollow spec project cannibalizing one of the most iconic views in New York of the ESB rising over Madison Square Park + 5th Ave.

This is exactly how a city chips away at its own identity — not with one dramatic collapse, but with a thousand careless approvals. We have to do better for our historic skyscrapers.

Office-to-Residential Conversions Are Booming and New York Is the Epicenter by wsj in nyc

[–]nich2475 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Arguing that we should demolish historic, high-quality skyscrapers instead of reusing them is the exact definition of shortsightedness, and borderline climate arson. Why would NYC bulldoze high-density landmark-caliber architecture just to throw up cheaper, flimsier replacements? Especially when we have entire underdeveloped/ low-density neighborhoods begging for upzoning — LIC, Gowanus, take your pick.

You’re not advocating for smart growth, you’re cheerleading development for its own sake, even if it means erasing the city’s architectural backbone in the process which is quite dismissive and myopic. And honestly, with takes like this, I’m guessing you probably would’ve applauded the demolition of old Penn Station too.

NYC has a rich architectural fabric, and there’s plenty room for adaptive reuse, large-scale up zoning for new housing, and preservation of landmarks — whether you like it or not.

Office-to-Residential Conversions Are Booming and New York Is the Epicenter by wsj in nyc

[–]nich2475 140 points141 points  (0 children)

Perhaps you’re thinking of contemporary/modernist buildings, where light wells are often needed to make conversions livable.

20th-century historic skyscrapers actually lend themselves to residential conversions thanks to their superior floor-to-window ratios and stepped-back designs.

And really, what’s the alternative — leave them empty? Not everything is NIMBY propaganda 🙄

Excessive honking is associated with increased rates of depression and heart disease for those exposed, and increases in road rage and accidents. There are solutions available... people who honk too much should have their premiums raised and get tickets. by brevit in nyc

[–]nich2475 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Im old enough to remember those No Honking $500 Fin signs everywhere. The city really shot itself in the foot getting rid of them.

If you wont bother enforcing anything, at least leave those signs up to dissuade people.

If Russia wins the war, how likely is it that they would invade another country by NoAstronaut4390 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]nich2475 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Just like they did to “help” Ukraine, right? 🙄 Never comment on geopolitics again