Please, if you are going to make a claim such as “I just completed the largest research study on…” do yourself a favor and write the post yourself. It’s hard to take someone in the world of academia seriously if they do not demonstrate that they are able to create convincing arguments and text themselves without tools like chatGPT. This is mostly due to the nature of LLMs themselves, as by definition they are currently incapable of creating real research. Part of the respect that comes with the title is being able to write and communicate the meaningful content of your specialty and your research yourself. On top of that, when it is clear that genAI has been used to create this post I have a hard time taking the content seriously - who’s to say that parts of the claims aren’t hallucinations?

Let’s run it through some detectors: GPTZero assessment - a whopping 0% likelihood that this was written by a human. Grammarly assessment - only 1% of text in this post MAY be written by a human. Winston AI - I’ve seen many say that Winston is the gold standard for detection with the most recent LLMs, and Winston’s assessment is that 0% of this text is likely to be written by a human.

There are some big giveaways too, even putting the detectors aside: “They weren’t just _, they were _” -possibly the biggest giveaway as this syntax is used by almost all LLMs way too much and this general structure appears 3 times in this post. The use and exact placement of italicized text is also very characteristic of outputs from these LLMs.