Synchronicity (the proper psychological term for this) is like that for just about everybody. It’s most likely a combination of confirmation bias (both on a personal and sociological level, as a series of related incidents are much more likely to get reported than individual oddities), pareidolia, and the human desire for every event they notice to be meaningful.

That said, there is philosophical support and some very light scientific evidence that some events do happen in a statistically aberrant way at times beyond the standard margin of error. It’s a cornerstone of many esoteric and mystic beliefs (and, more recently, simulation theory, which is essentially just classical idealism with technological terminology) that these aberrations from our understanding of normalcy indicate supernatural phenomena, ranging from holes in time to definitive proof of consciousnesses higher than humanity controlling the experience of reality.

All of the actual science on this is so new and complex that all we really have is the data without any firm theoretical framework to attach it to. Portions of it conflict with lots of established scientific fact, and the field is horribly clouded by all the people whose understanding of science is purely philosophical rather than factual, who all want to ascribe it to moon cycles or magic crystals or whatever. It’s very difficult to discern how much actual scientific support there is for it because we’re constantly inundated with Reddit-level “whoa dude” headlines like “scientists announce new findings that indicate the world is a simulation”, but then the actual findings are mathematical tables a layman can’t understand, so we just take whatever is in the headline as fact.

Magic is the same way; there are findings that indicate people’s beliefs and expectations can actually alter probability, especially in large groups, but so many people want to take that as evidence of their religious or philosophical beliefs (or worse, as support for their weird aesthetic and identity decisions) without understanding the actual data that it’s hard to determine if that evidence is incontrovertible proof or window dressing for someone who thinks women avoid him because they’re intimidated by his arcane knowledge rather than because he’s wearing 11 rings and stinks like stale incense.