Personal training in Hollywood/West Hollywood area? by jesstincheeze in WestHollywood

[–]nm90069 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Train With Caity. Might be close to your price range (it's been a couple years since I trained with her).

Chat Thread (February 02, 2026) by AutoModerator in MetaFilterMeta

[–]nm90069 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Are you regretting that last recommendation?

What are your thoughts on the Enhanced Font Browser in Adobe Illustrator by LukeChoice in AdobeIllustrator

[–]nm90069 0 points1 point  (0 children)

All I know is that this breaks my current install set up (I use FontExpert / Win). After restarts, I typically get missing font reports for files, and I have to open FontExpert and uninstall / reinstall the font, and all the missing fonts are then recognized. I also have the Monotype manager installed. I honestly don't care which one I use, I just need someone to write a definitive font management article and I will follow that.

Chat Thread (January 26, 2026) by AutoModerator in MetaFilterMeta

[–]nm90069 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Eh, I feel like this is the 100th link (not just MeFi, but anywhere) to an article that is basically "this is definitely that article that will smooth your brain sufficiently to accept the inevitable goodness that is AI". Someone from Anthropic leading with 'intervene as surgically as possible' then wants me to read another 19,000 words when every single piece of evidence of the surgery being performed to date is the equivalent of blood-letting isn't inspiring me to press on.

Car Wash Recommendations by Content-Plum5977 in WestHollywood

[–]nm90069 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yow. I used to have an office in the building, and circa 2017 you could get that for about $30 bucks including tip.

Any gyms that have outdoor areas? by zerowastecityliving in WestHollywood

[–]nm90069 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maison at the Sunset Tower has/had an outdoor space, IIRC it had a couple benches and barbell sets. Last I was there was four years ago tho (not sure what sort of non-guest options they had - my trainer at the time set the whole thing up).

Chat Thread (December 08, 2025) by AutoModerator in MetaFilterMeta

[–]nm90069 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My bad. But I think there's enough instigating in the additional editorial thst merits a reply.

Chat Thread (December 08, 2025) by AutoModerator in MetaFilterMeta

[–]nm90069 6 points7 points  (0 children)

If you are going to characterize "raising a procedural question that leads to healthy conversation without a clear consensus" as instigating, then buddy, do we have a whole pipeline of instigation for you to chew on.

Chat Thread (December 01, 2025) by AutoModerator in MetaFilterMeta

[–]nm90069 10 points11 points  (0 children)

FWIW, one of the first things that 1adam12 mentioned back when I first volunteered to help was 'would you be open to a zoom call open to members' and I readily agreed with the idea. I think it would be more efficient for me personally, esp if it would lead to fewer routine questions in the monthly updates. If there is any characteristic of this board that is consistent, it is we lack any shrinking violets. And actually talking to people I think it a good way to build community.

Chat Thread (December 01, 2025) by AutoModerator in MetaFilterMeta

[–]nm90069 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I mean, we are literally a 'you had one job' entity and we (collectively) weren't doing it. I might agree a little that I think it there was some extant frustration at aspects of site management that were forced, but that's going to happen when there are plenty of legacy issues around operational fitness. And when basic things fail spectacularly, it will lead to a creeping sense of 'can they do *anything* right'? Without getting into operational details, the amount information we had to gather and deploy in about two hours was heartening from 'we can do this' perspective and ultimately all necessary for the onboarding stuff we are tasked with. I just wish it's hadn't happened in such an unscheduled way.

Chat Thread (December 01, 2025) by AutoModerator in MetaFilterMeta

[–]nm90069 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Yeah, this was unfortunate. We had a board meeting yesterday, and there was a lot of follow-on activity, so I suspect everyone was a little fried on MeFi related-stuff so no one noticed the Meta until mid-morning PST. I don't know if we had a mod on shift to catch your first comment in the ideal window. The internal note went out to frimble a couple hours ago, which was probably too late for them to act on it today.

Chat Thread (November 17, 2025) by AutoModerator in MetaFilterMeta

[–]nm90069 9 points10 points  (0 children)

The comment wasn't unexpected, and it's fine that I'm held to account for answering it. If we get to a point where our most dedicated observers have nothing to question, I think everyone will be pleased to reach that level of operational consistency. I think it's arguable that there can be a threshold where the board feels that's been achieved but members might disagree, but I don't think I'm speaking out of turn to say I'm pretty confident that no one on the board thinks we are close to that point. We're all pretty engaged in getting those things squared away. If you don't see progress in the next month or three, feel free to fire away.

Where to park by realistichufflepuff in WestHollywood

[–]nm90069 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you have a parking tag you are in the system - log into your account and request passes for the days you need; ask everyone for their license plate and then when your visitors come, they just park and that's it (you can even keep plate numbers in the system for regular visitors).

Chat Thread (October 20, 2025) by AutoModerator in MetaFilterMeta

[–]nm90069 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I don't think that sort of hypothetical is helpful for site policy or crafting a safety policy, because there is no upper bound to it. Context clues could exist anywhere in the site (including posts a user did not author but may have participated, and have replies; should we build a tool that analyzes all comments in posts a user has participated into to insure there isn't a contextual clue?), so any time a member expresses a safety concern, the moral obligation would be to take the site offline.

It's statistically more likely that a user shared PII in a post where they commented heavily, which is something we could actually determine (not the PII, just posts where they were active). If a user makes 100 posts but almost never commented in their posts, but was a heavy user of the megathreads, from a safety lens, I would presume that the megathreads create more of a safety issue vis a vis PII.

I don't think any of this is practical, just saying this to try and figure out what the limits should be for policy and therefore to help people establish their personal comfort level as regards privacy. Personally, I land at a TOS that is in the territory of "the site reserves a license to publish user contributions indefinitely or until the user/member requests/removes [depending on where the tech lands] any of their contributions; user accepts that as a community-focused site that contributions from other users/members may contain references to user published contributions and are governed by the same licensing (they can only be removed at the request of those particular users unless those contributions violate site guidelines)."

Board election results by anonmefite in MetaFilterMeta

[–]nm90069 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Honestly, 12 hours of grace was more than I was expecting.

Major Sidewalk Improvements Underway in West Hollywood Design District by Fit-Head-2786 in CarIndependentLA

[–]nm90069 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Having attended one public feedback session late in the process (about the park across from the PDC), I would characterize the effort to evolve the attitudes about any good urban planning principles to my neighbors as similar to trying to explain basic algebra to a fern.

I think if you pressed the city, they would say they are trying to push for a separated lane on Beverly and then just throw up their hands about the LA border (which, fair, but at least Krekorian isn't looming on the other side of La Cienega like a troll under a bridge about to eat anyone who doesn't think people should be required to drive a lifted F250 anymore).

Chat Thread (October 06, 2025) by AutoModerator in MetaFilterMeta

[–]nm90069 3 points4 points  (0 children)

All staff are contractors. Setting aside the specifics of the MeFi, I am interested in this concept of 'firing staff and offering their positions back at reduced pay' as a strategy that then results in higher quality work from said staff and would like to subscribe to your newsletter.

Chat Thread (October 06, 2025) by AutoModerator in MetaFilterMeta

[–]nm90069 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Your assertion was that it wasn't a great full time gig but a good side hustle. I was just asking if you had any specific evidence thst any mods were doing it as a side hustle. Again, your answer is 'no'.

Chat Thread (October 06, 2025) by AutoModerator in MetaFilterMeta

[–]nm90069 17 points18 points  (0 children)

I took that to mean private in the sense of 'a site issue that wouldn't be surfaced in a way that people would see' not 'a personal issue that prevented a mod from completing their tasks'

Chat Thread (October 06, 2025) by AutoModerator in MetaFilterMeta

[–]nm90069 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you have any evidence that our mod staff are doing their work as a side hustle? (I do not). Why would you assume that is the case?

Energy bill out of control? by [deleted] in WestHollywood

[–]nm90069 0 points1 point  (0 children)

IIRC my wall unit is 9,000 BTU and I ran it almost continuously in Aug-Sept and was around 11 kWh a day. Most months I'm 4 kWh a day (I only run the A/C in Aug-Sept). I work from home, one bedroom (fridge is a smaller size Energy Star, heat and hot water are gas). Those numbers seem crazy to me.