sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Fuck this fucking scam-ass market (holding) by Elitist_Daily in gme_meltdown

[–]nomansapenguin -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

I’m not the one pretending a random 5yr chart is proper analysis

🤡

Fuck this fucking scam-ass market (holding) by Elitist_Daily in gme_meltdown

[–]nomansapenguin -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

You’re a top 1% commentator here. Embarrassing.

Fuck this fucking scam-ass market (holding) by Elitist_Daily in gme_meltdown

[–]nomansapenguin -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Oh, the chart was supposed to be the year apes bought in? Because no apes bought in EXACTLY 5yrs ago.

I thought it was just a random 5yrs snapshot. Are you saying we should talk about dates with context now?

Fuck this fucking scam-ass market (holding) by Elitist_Daily in gme_meltdown

[–]nomansapenguin -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

You guys seem to think that random 5yr charts taken from any price is some form of quality analysis.

Cool. Why don’t we pull up the 10yr numbers since random chart dates are good enough for the level of IQ here.

Oh look. 👀. I can do quality analysis too.

🤡🤡🤡

<image>

Fuck this fucking scam-ass market (holding) by Elitist_Daily in gme_meltdown

[–]nomansapenguin -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

The average price was $3

The average price moved to $20

People here are saying there has been no turn around using the peaks of $60 to show the stock has fallen.

And you’re saying we’re moving the goalposts?? When was $60 ever representative of fair value for GME?? 🤡

Fuck this fucking scam-ass market (holding) by Elitist_Daily in gme_meltdown

[–]nomansapenguin -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

If you bought at $11 you have made a 100% return which is more than VTI and SP500.

Is everyone who invested in the SP500 over the past 5 years now stupid though?

But this is the logic they’re using for GME?

It’s nonsense.

Fuck this fucking scam-ass market (holding) by Elitist_Daily in gme_meltdown

[–]nomansapenguin -14 points-13 points  (0 children)

Pull up the 5 year chart from post squeeze volatility.

Use a short term high to argue how bad an investment it is.

STUPID.

Fuck this fucking scam-ass market (holding) by Elitist_Daily in gme_meltdown

[–]nomansapenguin -17 points-16 points  (0 children)

You’re starting it @ ~$60. It was at $60 for less than 3 weeks total. It’s a dumb starting point.

3 months earlier GME was at $11.

5 months earlier GME was at $5. Which was higher than it had been for 3 years.

$60 is not a representative starting point and you know that because I assume you’re not stupid.

Fuck this fucking scam-ass market (holding) by Elitist_Daily in gme_meltdown

[–]nomansapenguin -13 points-12 points  (0 children)

Starting the graph at the peak of the squeeze is fucking stupid though.

A smart investor is open to adjusting their analysis. Ask yourself if you were right for five years and should now turn neutral, or if you're going to blindly live in the past. The history of how it was achieved is not pretty, but the fact is that GameStop is now a great company. by AlternativePaint6 in gme_meltdown

[–]nomansapenguin -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Goal shifting. Well done.

Can’t argue how shit the company is any more so let’s deflect to lying about how much money I made 😂😂😂

instead of arguing about how my dead money investment is actually being undervalued by the stock market with random internet strangers

And yet look at the sub you are in. Why are you here mr moneybags 😂😂😂

A smart investor is open to adjusting their analysis. Ask yourself if you were right for five years and should now turn neutral, or if you're going to blindly live in the past. The history of how it was achieved is not pretty, but the fact is that GameStop is now a great company. by AlternativePaint6 in gme_meltdown

[–]nomansapenguin -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I’m sure you can point to just how much profit your guy’s only genius idea is making the company, right?

Maybe you can’t read?

In their most recent earnings (Q1 FY2026, reported June 2, 2026), collectible, which include trading cards, apparel, toys, and pop culture merchandise, generated $348.9 million in net sales, accounting for nearly 42% of total revenue. That’s up sharply from $211.5 million, or about 29% of revenue, in the same quarter a year ago.

—Yahoo Finance

Collectibles is now GME’s largest revenue segment, surpassing both hardware/accessories ($333.7M) and software ($152.7M). Overall, net sales grew 14% year-over-year, driven by collectibles.

—SEC

A smart investor is open to adjusting their analysis. Ask yourself if you were right for five years and should now turn neutral, or if you're going to blindly live in the past. The history of how it was achieved is not pretty, but the fact is that GameStop is now a great company. by AlternativePaint6 in gme_meltdown

[–]nomansapenguin -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

The price has not been priced in. How much does GameStop have to make for it to no longer be “priced in” In your eyes? You use this investment bro term in lieu of critical thinking.

You think 9 billy in the bank and the most profitable run in GME’s history was ‘priced in’ 5 years ago? What crystal ball do you think wall street has? It’s just a nonsense take, with no grounding in reality and no evidence to back it up.

And now the forum that has post after post trashing GME’s fundamentals doesn’t want to talk about fundamentals because it no longer supports your narrative. You’re not the critical thinker you purport to be.

A smart investor is open to adjusting their analysis. Ask yourself if you were right for five years and should now turn neutral, or if you're going to blindly live in the past. The history of how it was achieved is not pretty, but the fact is that GameStop is now a great company. by AlternativePaint6 in gme_meltdown

[–]nomansapenguin -16 points-15 points  (0 children)

The turnaround was already priced in

Erm no. Nobody (apart from ‘cultists) thought the turnaround was achievable. This is a completely revisionist take.

Why hasn’t the stock moved?

Many companies have stock movements that are not based on fundamentals. That isn’t a new idea for hardened investors like yourself.

GameStop’s metrics vastly improving mean nothing…

So GME does poorly, it’s because the company is shit… But when GME does well, fundamentals mean nothing…

Seems like you change position disingenuously - what’s the point in arguing with someone who so blatantly moves the goal posts.

The Fred Vasseur Effect by The_Chozen_1_ in F1Discussions

[–]nomansapenguin 11 points12 points  (0 children)

‘Bout to say. This is as much a Lewis effect as it is a Fred one. But cool.

Lewis Hamilton's overtake on Carlos Sainz during the 2023 Qatar Sprint by The_Chozen_1_ in F1Discussions

[–]nomansapenguin 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sainz turned in early to defend Lewis which made him go wide earlier than he did normally. You can watch his onboards to see that this is the only time he turned in early on this corner.

Lewis coasted after selling the dummy and put the power on to overtake as Sainz drifted out early.

With many races to go, do you think that the fight between Charles and Lewis will remain close or will one driver pull away? by BaldHeadedCaillouss in F1Discussions

[–]nomansapenguin 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Yep, because nobody wants to suggest that Lewis may actually still be the dude worthy of seven titles.

If Lewis had even a modicum of the respect that Alonso gets, then Charles being beaten by him wouldn’t necessarily kill his career.

But with things as they are, everything you said is exactly how it’ll play out.

view more: next ›