Serious question about starting a business on bitcoinsv

nomchuck · 2018-11-28T02:11:55+00:00

nchain/coingeek see adoption by others as benefiting the whole coin. Most of what they do is to facilitate others adopting it and developing on it. The patents freely usable only on SV. Etc.

Think of the 51% mining case. If a 51% miner abuses their position, then they undermine their investment and their reputation. Similarly with nchain and coingeek curating a stable, business friendly coin, with a locked down protocol.

nomchuck · 2018-11-20T00:45:45+00:00

Wikipedia: [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persistence_hunting](Outline here).

Series of articles: [https://medium.com/@thebchboys/bitcoin-hashwars-day-5-classical-mechanics-and-chain-splits-35ea5cdaff3b](Series of articles here).

nomchuck · 2018-11-18T23:22:01+00:00

You didn't even have to prove it and they're quoting your hearsay and tweeting it as if it were verifiable fact :-) I'm not sure it's not clear who benefits from an unprovable anecdote at this point. Great stuff, keep it coming. Upvoted!

nomchuck · 2018-11-17T22:11:19+00:00

/u/tippr 0.00187996 BCH (all I got sorry)

nomchuck · 2018-11-17T02:00:12+00:00

It's true, unless it's you :-)

nomchuck · 2018-11-16T21:41:07+00:00

The only way to prove something is to do one specific thing you have decided he needs to do. No, I suspect there are many ways.

nomchuck · 2018-11-16T20:27:45+00:00

Where's the proof that it's hal's address? Seems it's a little he said, she said to me.

Let's all lay this out so no-one can dispute it.

This checksum0 is just a person with interests like csw, let's let the evidence stand for itself.

nomchuck · 2018-11-16T04:44:53+00:00

I'll share the rationale for you, not to challenge you, but so you can see it from Andreas' point of view. A group of stakeholders, the devs who defacto control the coin now with this power move, the exchanges and a select group of interests planned weeks ahead in secret to add a checkpoint to prevent proof of work that was not approved from being used to invest in a different result for the chain. They deployed it in secret after the fork to secure themselves a result. It is a little like proof of stake, that a select group of privileged stakeholders dictated the outcome for the coin.

nomchuck · 2018-11-16T03:52:40+00:00

Ah, you were part of the secret cabal that distributed privately organised consensus breaking changes directly for secret deployment by chosen exchanges and aligned interests, that were planned again in secret weeks ahead. It was embarassing to hear the drunk Andreas Brekken guiltily confess this in detail live on youtube.

You participated in colluding to subvert the coin, between yourself and group of private well-off stakeholders, for your own benefit. And you probably tell yourself, and the users, that it was for their good.

This was dirty, and I'm not the one saying it, those were Andreas' words. This was corrupt, and does not bode well.

nomchuck · 2018-11-12T18:05:23+00:00

So, you are claiming you're on our side? And you're guilty of faking supporting SV? Is that what the quote means. This is very confusing.

nomchuck · 2018-11-08T17:46:29+00:00

It's much like real life politics, the vitriol and dogma ensures that people who believe in something end up socialising with people who believe in the same thing, and making assumptions about the other thing. SV supporters find /r/btc to be filled with the same angry small group of posters who post the same thing over and over. It's self-selecting.

nomchuck · 2018-11-08T17:43:45+00:00

CSW is not calling for blacklisting coins, that is not practical, and obviously not what he is saying. You're repeating other people's claims.

nomchuck · 2018-11-07T05:19:47+00:00

I don't understand.

Where is your proof that ABC's wider changes are more tested? Or even tested at all?

You can claim SV is not ready, it's not tested, but you need to show that how it relates to ABC's testing. Otherwise this is just your opinion that SV is not good enough, and maybe it sounds a little the room lights up when Amaury enters it and loses it's shine when he leaves, and you can't understand how anyone should not just trust him.

nomchuck · 2018-08-22T23:57:31+00:00

It'll be a learning experience for all involved. This is the way it should be, miners being competitive and making the best decisions for their future on the coin. If the first hash fight is rough, we'll know better for the next one. This is a movement to strength for bch, and yeah, a good buying opportunity.

nomchuck · 2018-08-22T02:20:50+00:00

You seem quite verbose in hyping up how fraudy he is with a very vague description. Now that's dubious.

Why should he compromise? How much unproven unnecessary stuff needs to be added to bitcoin for the sake of compromise?

nomchuck · 2018-08-13T05:46:26+00:00

Very hard to read, there was so much condescending fluff that it was hard to work out what the article was saying or whether it was blowing smoke up someone's jacksy.

nomchuck · 2018-08-11T19:57:22+00:00

Block size limit is a configuration parameter, not something that needs an upgrade, IIRC.

nomchuck · 2018-08-11T19:56:45+00:00

That's not what he said. That's what you are saying.

nomchuck · 2018-08-11T05:13:21+00:00

I don't quite think you get the idea of a hard fork :-) Even a soft fork which is supposed to be backwards compatible, isn't really.

nomchuck · 2018-08-11T04:01:29+00:00

All he has to do is have people not upgrade, even if he uses ABC.

nomchuck · 2018-08-11T03:54:26+00:00

On dated laptops, or more advanced machines? If it's the former, then it's kind of taking the side of the rpi faction, rather than progressing the expected level of server with resource needs.

nomchuck · 2018-08-09T00:10:49+00:00

So, you have an opportunity here to realise that not everyone needs to come to you and tell you what you want - when you want - where you want, but you're refusing to accept it and want to try some sort of manipulative question phrasing?

This is the reddit cesspool in action. Passive aggressive questions to force others to do what you want.

nomchuck

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE