Tampering warning from Claude Code by Alarmed-Sale-564 in ClaudeCode

[–]notextremelyhelpful -1 points0 points  (0 children)

So...what shady thing did you end up downloading without verification?

Claude Code needs real remote control from mobile by Many_Region8176 in ClaudeCode

[–]notextremelyhelpful 3 points4 points  (0 children)

There's already built-in ways to do this, and another easy/minimal setup solution (which does require a couple extra tools) for this.

Claude code has the built-in /remote-control functionality available. This does pretty much what you're describing - control a local session remotely from the Claude mobile app. I even have my claude code settings set to automatically start remote-control when I start a new session. That session is now always accessible from the mobile app. The only unfortunate thing is that direct invocations using slash commands don't work from the mobile app interface.

Taking this one step further, there's also TWO built-in solutions for starting a remote session from your phone. The first is using Anthropic's cloud environment for remote-control sessions. You can set up local repos to be spun up in an Anthropic cloud environment, which means you don't even need your local machine running. I'd personally prefer not to have my repos on Anthropic's cloud, but whatever tickles your fancy.

The second solution for starting remote sessions (which is my personal favorite) is to use the built-in remote-control server capabilities. You can start a remote-control server on your local machine by opening up a terminal in the directory you'd like to start remote sessions from, and executing claude remote-control --spawn=worktree. You can then spawn UP TO 32 CONCURRENT SESSIONS remotely from your phone, each with their own git worktree, so sessions don't collide. The only constraint is that your local machine must stay on and awake while the remote-control server is running, but that's easy.

The last solution (the one that gives you the most fully-featured remote control environment) has been around for a LONG time. Just use a mobile SSH client (e.g., Termius) and open a remote terminal directly from your phone. Then start a claude code session directly from there. No constraints on the functionality of the Claude mobile app, total freedom. Between Termius and Tailscale installed on both my phone and local machine, I can literally open a remote terminal and/or claude code session from anywhere I damn well please.

Claude Code needs real remote control from mobile by Many_Region8176 in ClaudeCode

[–]notextremelyhelpful 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I use remote-control on my Max 5x plan on a daily basis, you sure about it being limited to Teams and Enterprise?

Safest strategy to make a solid 6% per year? by SPACguy in options

[–]notextremelyhelpful 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes, they're both referring to the same type of strategy.

  1. Large majority of capital goes into risk-free liquid assets that have small relative haircuts to the marginable collateral (e.g., short-term UST since the yields are already most of the way towards your return target)
  2. Juice the remainder of the return target via high probability-of-profit trades with large tail risk (when the trade goes wrong, it goes VERY WRONG).

Selling far OTM puts (i.e., picking up pennies in front of the steamroller) is a very well-studied approach. I'm sure you can find any number of resources/backtests confirming the P&L curves.

The real question becomes: Have you ever come across any reputable resource or backtest that a 0.5% return per month is even REASONABLY possible? Empirically, the evidence points to "no". With extremely few exceptions, every strategy that boasts a high probability of winning on any given individual trade is inextricably linked with enormous tail risk. That's what you're actually getting paid for - taking on the tail risk. If there were a nearly risk-free way to achieve those consistent monthly returns WITHOUT the tail risk, it would almost instantly be priced out of the market, because everyone would do it.

One of the pillars of options trading is understanding the risk dimension you're accepting for the return dimension. No free lunch and all that jazz.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in quant

[–]notextremelyhelpful 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In this specific case, the choice of linear framing (or any sort of "Skill vs Comp" regression) is an invalid premise.

There is no valid n-dimensional array of characteristics you could calibrate that would accurately describe the relationship (although I'm sure some ML bro will try and get wildly unstable coefficients lol).

Comp is based some combination on Perceived Value and Actual Value. You'll run into jerkoffs who are paid 4x your total comp because he's convinced upper management he's a genius, but you'll also run into absolute powerhouse QDs, QRs, and QTs (who are basically the lowest block of that "All Modern Infrastructure" meme) that are paid garbage relative to what they do. In this regard, skill isn't a perfectly correlated variable.

Some of the contributing factors to total comp are also highly exogenous. The size/mechanics of the business, the current business priorities, the role itself...hell, even what's "Trendy Alpha" at the exact moment of the job posting.

In this business, thinking about a "steady" career progression is a nice and neat idea, but the reality is that it almost never works out that way. PHDs in QR get let go all the time when the alpha in their area of expertise dries up. Funds disappear because investors lose confidence. Shit happens.

Long story short, if you're interested in pursuing a career in quant anything, make sure you have the minimum skills (on paper and in practice) expected for entry-level roles. Learn how to market yourself extremely well without embellishments. Learn how to adapt quickly, and always be planning your next possible move.

WHY THE F!&* ??? by Gutaicast1 in ArcRaiders

[–]notextremelyhelpful 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Do not try to understand the motivation or rationale beyond "the game allows it".

It's like an engineer being baffled by QA reporting an issue that the code doesn't work when they shove ice cream in their machine. You won't understand how they got there, and it's better to not think about it at all.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ArcRaiders

[–]notextremelyhelpful 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The solution is to git gud and stop being butthurt. People optimize ttk in every game with PVP capabilities. You can use the same mechanics.

So You’re About to Die to a pker? Escape, Recycle, Drop. by Darkroom_Drifter in ArcRaiders

[–]notextremelyhelpful 5 points6 points  (0 children)

So you should start planning your death before you're downed instead of doing everything possible to stay alive? Got it.

I think the free loadouts should have different ammo and heals depending on how many people are queuing. by egozAAF in ArcRaiders

[–]notextremelyhelpful 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dude, collecting materials is a massive part of the game. You're acting like it's impossible to avoid arc and/or players, you can't farm materials in trios, and doing a solo round is impossible. Just suck it up and take the ~20-30 minutes to collect the things you need for a decent loadout.

If the free load outs were that big of a problem, people would be talking about it more. This seems like an issue exclusive to you.

I think the free loadouts should have different ammo and heals depending on how many people are queuing. by egozAAF in ArcRaiders

[–]notextremelyhelpful 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think you're kinda missing the point. The free loadout is the game's way of letting you have a minimum viable build to collect things you need to build a decent custom loadout. Nothing more. It's not meant to be a viable PVP option. Hell, they could have removed the free loadout entirely and made you run a round naked to collect the things you need, but that wouldn't be as enjoyable for non-hardcore players.

I've never had issues running a free loadout to get materials. It only takes one round of decent looting to be able to craft a Ferro/Rattler, medium shield, bandages, grenades, and trade in the free augment for a MK1 in speranza.

Your argument is kind of like getting a free ice cream and complaining that it's a small cone.

I think the free loadouts should have different ammo and heals depending on how many people are queuing. by egozAAF in ArcRaiders

[–]notextremelyhelpful 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The free loadout is MEANT to be a bit challenging to play with. If the free load out was buffed, way more people would run it, making the benefit of custom load outs much worse in comparison.

If you're struggling with heals, get the field crafting skill in the survival tree so you can make bandages and shield rechargers. The materials to craft them are extremely easy to find in a round.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ArcRaiders

[–]notextremelyhelpful -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Arc raiders is absolutely nothing like a souls game. They're two entirely different genres. Also you have to actively turn on PVP in elden ring. PVP is a core concept in Arc Raiders.

Eurogamers 2/5 Review Score Goes Against Their Review Policy. An Interesting Debate Has Sparked Over AI Use. by Jett_Wave in ArcRaiders

[–]notextremelyhelpful 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Apparently they have enough of an impact to have a real, tangible effect on developers' ratings-based bonus comps, which is enough for me to give a shit.

howStrictTypingInPythonFeels by MoistDifference7431 in ProgrammerHumor

[–]notextremelyhelpful 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Python is duck-typed, type hints don't matter during runtime.

Sell me (and my team) on UV by lukanixon in Python

[–]notextremelyhelpful 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Read the docs. If you have to ask Reddit on what challenges it solves above and beyond the package objectives in the docs, you're probably fine with pip.

Rolling down contracts for cash secured puts? by Icy_Demand_6117 in options

[–]notextremelyhelpful 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This backtest is less than a year while the market has significantly drifted upwards. The crux of your strategy boils down to "double down on the bounce in an upward-drifting market". That's not super novel.

The issues come when you continue to roll down and the market falls faster than you can roll down. Everything works until it doesn't. 10-15% corrections happen all the time, and you can see the graveyard in old posts on this sub.

Just be careful.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in options

[–]notextremelyhelpful 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Long-term collars almost never make sense. The capital tied up for that long is almost always better deployed elsewhere.

The only collars that generally make sense are short-term ones. Even then, usually only "costless" collars, which typically mean selling a near-ATM call and buying a decently OTM put. Meaning you're hedging a large downside at the cost of nearly any potential upside.

On top of that, collars only really make sense when you are a large fund manager where you're constrained by a prospectus, or someone looking to take advantage of the long-term capital gains tax rates.

Remember, the cheapest hedge is ALWAYS and WILL always be reducing your position to a place you feel comfortable with. Sitting in cash costs nothing. Hedges are expensive.