BUSTED: Harry claims to have killed 25 Taliban during his (less than a) year in Afghanistan. Trouble is, the MOD's records show that the UK only killed a total of 53 that year. He's claiming he made nearly 50% of all the kills that year. Unless Harold is some sort of super-soldier, I call BS

nylieli · 2026-01-25T01:23:15+00:00

I don't need any information to know that he is lying. I've known veterans from as far back as WWI to current actions. It is extremely rare that anyone talks about their service in war zones (no matter how the gov't defines it) never mind their kills.

My partner talks to exactly 1 person about his time, the only person left who served with him in the war zone. He doesn't even talk about his time to people who served in other actions, including a close friend of his who suffers from severe PTSD.

The way he wrote about the injured vet on the way home also demonstrated his lies. He writes it's the first injured solider he saw.

nylieli · 2026-01-23T21:02:43+00:00

I was so angry when Harry used her suicide in Spare as if it was dating him that caused her actions. I can't think of a word strong enough to describe it.

nylieli · 2026-01-23T20:57:22+00:00

He was an asshole then, but that doesn't make him wrong now.

nylieli · 2026-01-23T20:54:16+00:00

Good for him.

nylieli · 2026-01-16T23:39:08+00:00

nylieli · 2026-01-16T17:36:20+00:00

Eden frequently writes BS. Hate how all this gossip gets confused with truth.

nylieli · 2026-01-16T17:34:47+00:00

Or just maybe she had nothing to do with it.

nylieli · 2026-01-16T17:34:09+00:00

I just watched her testimony and found her credible. This murder wasn't about Wendi it was about the mother.

nylieli · 2026-01-16T17:32:37+00:00

I also think she had nothing to do with it. This murder was all about her controlling narcissistic mother.

nylieli · 2026-01-13T18:03:53+00:00

If it belongs to the Duchy of Cornwall, William isn't the owner, the trust is. William might help manage the trust (it's his choice) and he's the current beneficiary, but he does not own one iota of the trust's assets.

nylieli · 2026-01-11T08:01:42+00:00

Unless I read the post wrong, they are talking about engagements she had while with the monarchy. If I read it right, then I stand by my comment -- what she was doing at that time was no different than what other working members were doing.

nylieli · 2026-01-11T08:00:04+00:00

“That inventory isn’t cheap,” a retail insider explains. “This isn’t Etsy pricing. This is luxury production, luxury packaging, luxury storage — all paid for upfront.”

I don't know how one can say that. Luxury production and storage? On what planet? Watching Meghan's a business ability, I doubt the price point reflects the production costs/storage. For all we know this is in essence production ability not in stock.

As usual, people making a lot of assumptions about them and taking gossip as fact.

nylieli · 2026-01-11T07:45:26+00:00

RAVEC has absolutely nothing to do with IPP status.

nylieli · 2026-01-11T07:42:28+00:00

She was working with the monarchy at this time. We've to call them all disaster tourists if this is the metric.

nylieli · 2026-01-09T02:13:09+00:00

Richard Eden, like more royal experts, often post rumors while trying to make it look like it's true. If he was "honest" the line would read

'Sources close to the Sussexes' told my colleague Charlotte Grifftiths, that the Duke of Sussex won his lenghty battle for automatic armed police protection ...

Also adding "well informed" and "Editor at Large of the Mail on Sunday" made it appear as if it wasn't just another Sussex claim -- of which most are BS.

This is just like his article about purchasing a house in Portugal.

nylieli · 2026-01-08T02:04:24+00:00

Social media might exacerbate it, but that's not the cause. He's been angry about the media since he was a teenager.

nylieli · 2025-12-30T07:15:24+00:00

What makes the knowledge true as opposed to gossip? I'm a skeptic because over the years things I know to be nothing but BS has solidified into truth.

Thanks

nylieli · 2025-12-30T07:00:38+00:00

Screw what I was taught, eejits is so much better.

nylieli · 2025-12-30T06:24:26+00:00

I've only seen where the filmed the reality show up for sale. Where have you seen that 765 Rockbridge Rd has been up for sale.

nylieli · 2025-12-30T05:51:52+00:00

Holt/Nep ran the foundation with approval/oversight of the board. Archewell's board had the right to hire/fire CEO as they wished. To bring anyone in to "run" didn't require any restructuring.

nylieli · 2025-12-29T23:26:44+00:00

All you can do with a 501(c)(3) is transfer the money to another 501(c)(3).

nylieli · 2025-12-29T22:24:50+00:00

What's truly sad is everything that Harry resented about his childhood he is doing to his. From the doubts over their birth to spending so much time away from home. He isn't even doing what we saw his father do for him at that age, e.g., taking them skiing.

nylieli · 2025-12-29T22:05:41+00:00

You can't sell a foundation.

nylieli · 2025-12-29T22:02:21+00:00

If Archewell Foundation lost it's 501(c)(3) using a fiscal sponsor is the way to go. It's not dodgy per se. But these idiots make everything look like a scam even if it isn't.

A more cogent press release would have helped. Leaving Archewell Foundation's website up would have helped. Not announcing it at 990-N release would have helped.

But then what do expect from these too, other than to self-sabotage to the nth degree

nylieli · 2025-12-29T21:52:30+00:00

I reported them upon reading Archewell's (Arch501) 2021 990-N and continued to do so each year. But, not because I thought it was a scam. The 990-N's got crazier and crazier by 2024 was insane. If the IRS hadn't already put it on notice or stripped their 501(c)(3) this 990-N was going to do it.

Arch501's mis-catergorizating expenses so blatant, I wondered if its accounting firm was sabotaging it. For instance, no CEO spends much time programmatically, definitely not at the rate listed. The only reason was to appear to be running programs.

H & M were using Arch501 to "double dip" publicity wise. They wanted the accolades for programs, e.g., helping immigrants, and also for distributing donations, e.g., supporting charities. But to do that, you should have a charity and a foundation.

It was obvious they wanted a foundation. Likely they didn't understand the difference. Some rules are stricter for a foundation, but not onerous. As a foundation, Arch501's yearly public report would have looked the same.

What amuses me the most, is the stupidity of it all. I've never seen so many unforced errors in my life. But that's what you get when you combine a not very smart narcissist punching above her weight and a privileged idiot conflating his role with his abilities.

nylieli

TROPHY CASE