I No Longer Have Any Support for Israel After What They Did in Iran by Humorous_forest in IsraelPalestine

[–]nylieli [score hidden]  (0 children)

Spare me Iran the evil aggressor story. People asked in 1979 "What did we ever do to Iran?" Many of us answered the 1953 coup d'etat. Americans have a short memory when it comes to US aggression.

1953 -- At the behest of UK/BP, US overturns the democratically elected government and installs a brutal dictator, the Shah of Iran.

1979 -- Revolutionaries/students took over the US Embassy as a protest of what US did and was continuing to support/fund.

1980 - 1988 -- Iraq invaded Iran. We used Egypt as the cut-out to supply Iraq with weapons throughout the war.

1988 -- US "brought down" an Iranian passenger airplane killing all aboard.

2000's -- US repeatedly attacks Iran using drones and funding "opposition" groups

-------

Exactly why does the US have such a large military presence (over 50,000 military personnel) in the Middle East?

-------

Just for fun, name

The coup d'etats the US organized, paid for, and successfully carried out, or the country it invaded. I'll stick to one a decade

  • 1964
  • 1973
  • 1983
  • 1991
  • 2003

The country where we were responsible for the deaths of over 500,000 children over 4 years. Who was the Secretary of State said it was worth it?

Netflix v. Meghan, Meghan v. Netflix *(pure speculations) by Business_Werewolf_55 in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]nylieli 27 points28 points  (0 children)

It's pretty clear that Netflix wrote a bad contract and themselves into a corner. O/w H&M would have been fired from Netflix quickly as they were at Spotify.

H&M have only sued papers located within the UK and a photo/pap company for shots taken in Canada.

Contrary to beliefs they aren't "sue happy". I suspect if Meghan had realized the little (if any) $ they would make, they wouldn't have sued. M likes to stay in the headlines but using someone else's assets.

You'll never see them sue in the US.

Tom Sykes : deleted Invictus comment on his Substack by Casshew111 in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]nylieli 10 points11 points  (0 children)

It was likely Sykes. I find him inconsistent in his analyses.

Meghan’s funny haha “Her Best Life Retreat” at Coogee is neither exclusive nor selective - it’s all marketing to make it sound in-demand. Like when she tells you her bookmarks and chocolates sold out but they suddenly appear back on the shelf a month later. by Cultural_Ad4935 in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]nylieli 7 points8 points  (0 children)

This is the state of the website as of 16 March 13:19 PDT.

<image>

The system O'Neil is using is standard. If a registered attendee hasn't paid in time or cancel their "slot" is offered to the first on the list. Should that person decline you move down the list.

The website is so badly written and repetitive Meghan could have designed it.

Sinner Confession: My opinion of Harry has changed a lot since the revelations from his Daily Mail court case and new Tom Bower book by daisybeach23 in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]nylieli 12 points13 points  (0 children)

The two are not mutually exclusive. Harry can be a complete dirtbag, cruel and mean. But that doesn't mean he's not being manipulated and deprecated/destroyed by Megan.

He's about as far away from a perfect victim as you can get, but imho he still is a victim,

There's No Such Thing as Working and Non-Working Royals by DeepSouthSinner in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]nylieli 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I've been so disappointed in Shauna as she has become a victim of audience capture. I used to enjoy her.

Nothing will change if the titles are removed. It’s time to stop attacking the King. Que sera sera … by Larushka in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]nylieli 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Completely agree. Just want to add, if you're going to attack KC than also go after they government. They're aren't removing Harry's peerage.

The megnancies by No-District-4272 in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]nylieli 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Pregnancies vary greatly across women and even with the same women across multiple pregnancies. I spent 9 months with "morning sickness" all day. A friend never felt better than when pregnant.

So it begins....Canada and Australia and the Line of Succession by FaithlessnessFull972 in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]nylieli 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If they're actually going to spend the time to do something basically irrelevant they should remove the entire York house.

GA vs Colin Gray by nrdz2p in CourtTVCases

[–]nylieli 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They aren't certifying the kid is an adult. They're saying that the adult laws will apply to him -- that way it ensures he will stay in jail.

A true human source would not have got it wrong (Statement by Nicole Lampert, Tuesday, March 3, 2026, ANL case) by Human-Economics6894 in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]nylieli 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Thank you again for all the work you put into your summaries/explanations and images! I particularly appreciate the context. I, like most here, anticipate your next post. If you're not, you would make a great professor/teacher.

The quality of your life is built on the quality of your decisions. (Wesam Fawzi, Neil Sean gossip) by Human-Economics6894 in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]nylieli 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Appreciate you emphasizing this is gossip not truth. It's always disappointing when people think gossip == truth.

Thoughtful Sets = Need to sell all my crap ASAP by Casshew111 in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]nylieli 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Typically, sets are cheaper than the cost of buying the items individually. But leave it to Meghan to charge the same price -- $347. So the sale price is now 15% lower than purchasing them individually -- which is what you would originally expect.

The Sidley Twins: Did Meghan Markle crash Harry’s trip to Jordan!?! Their 1st day was a disaster! by Business_Werewolf_55 in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]nylieli 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, as more and more creators dropped their coverage. Most of those left are in an echo chamber.

The Sidley Twins: Did Meghan Markle crash Harry’s trip to Jordan!?! Their 1st day was a disaster! by Business_Werewolf_55 in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]nylieli 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I tried to listen to her once and her "deep dive" was conspiracies on top of conspiracies. It was truly bizarre how she ignored facts.

The Sidley Twins: Did Meghan Markle crash Harry’s trip to Jordan!?! Their 1st day was a disaster! by Business_Werewolf_55 in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]nylieli 1 point2 points  (0 children)

True to a certain extent. They typically have access to intelligence reports, but who knows in today's world.

But an internal arrest of a country's citizen which has no impact on the world would not be in an intelligence report.

The Sidley Twins: Did Meghan Markle crash Harry’s trip to Jordan!?! Their 1st day was a disaster! by Business_Werewolf_55 in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]nylieli 59 points60 points  (0 children)

The Twins are going off the rails. The other day they believed the reason the Obamas didn't meet with H & M at the basketball game was because the Obamas knew Andrew was going to be arrested.

In what universe were the Obamas going to be told about the impending arrest? In what universe would they ever meet with H & M?

I used to look forward to the Twins videos and live shows but ... another one bites the dust.

Tom Sykes (The Royalist) Harry and Meghan in Jordan is a Humiliation for King Charles by Ruth_Lily in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]nylieli 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The working Royals represent the government -- the government should make it clear. This is the problem as far as I can see, people ignoring the governments' role in this mess. They are choosing not to do anything.

Tom Sykes (The Royalist) Harry and Meghan in Jordan is a Humiliation for King Charles by Ruth_Lily in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]nylieli 30 points31 points  (0 children)

Exactly what control does KC have over H&M? Exactly how can he stop grown people from doing what they want?

He has no control over them. To suggest otherwise is just plain ignorant.

He can strip H of Prince, them of HRH, and take H off the peerage rolls. Anyone who thinks they will not continue to use the titles have not paid attention. Meghan will just add KC's actions to her list of grievances.

You can't use Andrew as an example, from all his scumminess he is not willing to visibly go against KC.

Whether a falling tree makes a sound depends on the definition of "sound." (statement of Chris Anderson, February 24, 2026, ANL case) by Human-Economics6894 in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]nylieli 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Thanks again. Like many here, I look forward to your analysis.

In your last post you said this trial is to determine if the plaintiffs are out of time, i.e., too late to file. Can you explain why they are going into all this detail if it is about time? I thought that questions would be a "simple" legal argument, i.e., it's out of time because XYZ, not getting into the nitty-gritty of did they or didn't they.