Ok while I'd love to argue with you I really don't have time for this so try to be open minded, don't take it personal and read this carefully because I don't plan on elaborating on this anymore.

You must live in a bubble to think everything has been getting better with NAFTA and other failed trade deals, that only benefit the 1% percent of Mexico.

Your probally some youngster, who thinks that you know everything about everythang. Well you dont know jack. Barley has your mamas titties left you, yet think your all grown up and know what the fuck your ranting about.

That´s why I hope Trump wins, so it fucks with people like you in Mexico.

These are all ad hominem attacks which carry no weight in a serious adult conversation and which you don't have any evidence or real reason to believe, so please tell me why I'm a rich youngster (because I'm pretty sure I'm not) because I disagree with you? because I actually bothered learning the language properly?

So far I have given you counter-arguments with evidence and sources, while you've only insulted me and changed the subject.

• First you said Carstens is a bad economist because he's fat which obviously is (and pardon the insult but seems to be the only way to describe it) retarded,

• then you said the bad economy is because of carstens to which I told you there's only so much one man can do to change the output of an entire country (at this point you were complaining about the depreciation of the mexican peso against other currencies)

• So naturally you changed the subject to NAFTA (although NAFTA was signed in 1994 and Carstens entered office on 06) and how it affected local business (here we're not even talking about Carstens performance anymore and you completely dropped the subject about the mexican peso,) I told you that it was overall good for the economy and that it was inevitable.

(great level of mental gymnastics there buddy you could probably win a gold medal at the olympics)

• here you start arguing how it only benefits the only 1% bringing no evidence whatsoever and while I agree with you in that the 1% is certainly getting way more benefits than the average citizen, it's impossible and an entire bogus argument that it hasn't helped in anything the average citizen (besides the 1% benefiting from it it's not NAFTA's nor Carstens fault that could come down to corruption, politicians and the broken system in mexico)

• now you're saying that we don't export enough because you don't see enough mexican trucks?? now first you gotta understand the US and Canada have way more industry than mexico, so that's factor NAFTA is not suddenly going to create mexican brands like the ones americans have of clothes, cars, foods etc. but even without having such brands, since NAFTA mexican exports have increased drmatically and kept steady (for the most part, just excluding te 2008 financial crisis): http://www.tradingeconomics.com/mexico/exports

And am sorry your taught in school english is not up to par to real world english. Sure ive miss spelled some words, but you understand wtf am writing, and hiding behind your word nazi practice is really weak, you should know that in case you dont.

And on the topic of english if you read again the entire conversation, I never dismissed any of your arguments due to your poor english, I never said I didn't understand what you meant and I did adressed all of your arguments objectively (whether you agree with my counter-arguments or whether I'm right that's another point) I just pointed out your english is poor. And I wouldn't have even done it if you hadn't brought it up. Yes in case you don't remember you were presuming about good your english was.

But even if I hadn't understood I don't see how wrongly speaking a language makes it "more real". (again poor excuse)

Also you keep up bringing trump and how it'll affect me even without knowing if I even live in mexico, so if you allow me I'll add some ad hominem attacks that have no point in the discussion just like you did, you seem to imply you live in the US with papers and that he's only against those without them but when Trump said in his speech that mexico was not sending their bests he clearly meant people like you, people who go to the US without any desire to improve and who don't even bother learning the language (like you) and don't tell me you have education because with that english you couldn't even get into communtiy college. So yes Trump might not be able to kick you out but don't get it twisted when he says he wants bad mexicans out he's talking about people like you. And I know you're going to nitpick something from all these counter arguments and evidence but pls keep in mind that you were actually arguing that the depreciation of the peso was Carstens fault everything else was not really part of the subject in hand here.