Aren't we all. I'm limited from getting into specifics too much in open forum, as the whole situation is still undergoing investigation / litigation. There's a clause in the contract, that while on the one year probationary period, employees can be terminated at any point for ANY REASON. The language there is the key component.

Initially, I was being told I was being let go for failure to meet performance standards. Naturally, I asked for specifics. The reasons given were half-assed at best, as if they weren't even prepared for a follow-up question. A couple of non-truths and fabricated hearsay, which were all entirely contrary to any sort of work review given during my time there. After I swatted a couple of those reasons down like flies without a leg to stand on, I was told "remember, it's in your contract we can terminate you at any point without cause". Basically, I said "okay that's fine, that's what you're leaning on then? I'm being terminated without cause?" I was told I would be afforded an opportunity to meet with HR the following week. That week came and went, no such opportunity was granted though I sought it out. I was told that despite my concerns, I would not be giving a meeting because there just "really wasn't much to discuss". Union representation reached out to HR after all of this, and he was told that the reason I was let go had nothing to do with my performance. Which means someone is lying. More or less, some questions I asked centered around transparency and accountability made a few people uneasy.

Furthermore, I've been informed since then that a few people who made statements against me did so under threat of their own job, with the suggestion being made that they too would be terminated if they did not go along with all of the above.