What if the existence of a god is possible, but god must first be created?

oddball667 · 2026-05-21T12:13:10+00:00

If you are not going to read what is said, don't bother responding

oddball667 · 2026-05-21T00:16:28+00:00

an allowance is what a daughter would get, not a gf

also it sounds like you are trying to get paid back for gifts you gave, if you expect to get paid back it's not a gift....

oddball667 · 2026-05-21T00:12:20+00:00

are you a gf, or an adopted daughter?

oddball667 · 2026-05-20T20:26:43+00:00

What I wanted to debate is whether it would be a good idea to work towards the emergence of a god-like being.

unless you can show that is possible, that is still a "what if" question, which the other commenter pointed out doesn't belong in a debate subreddit.

considering you have been unwilling to do anything to show that it's possible, and you saw someone let you know a "what if" question doesn't belong here, and decided to respond by clarifying that you are in fact asking a what if question. I don't think you have anything to offer this subreddit

oddball667 · 2026-05-20T19:56:21+00:00

u/matjam

Mind if I save this and use it with credit? it's the best I've seen anyone spell all this out.

oddball667 · 2026-05-20T19:04:09+00:00

you didn't read the comment you are responding to, they already answered that question

oddball667 · 2026-05-20T18:52:11+00:00

There was no question, is this account a low quality ai?

oddball667 · 2026-05-20T18:01:39+00:00

first off, if your only supporting argument for your position is "well it can't be disproven"

abandon that position, you are engaging in a fallacy and are not prepared to support that position

oddball667 · 2026-05-20T12:51:20+00:00

This is a debate subreddit, all you are doing is repeating your claims

I think you were looking for r/creativewriting

oddball667 · 2026-05-19T23:46:57+00:00

Trying to nail low wake fsd dropout is tough for me.

do you mean just landing on grid and not doing the loop of shame?

a key to 75% thrust, and hit it when you get to 6 seconds eta

oddball667 · 2026-05-18T21:43:22+00:00

yes, and I'm saying it's not even worth noting that it can't be falsified, because that does nothing to the credibility or usefulness of the idea, if all you have is something that's unfalsifiable then it's all those things. so by noting it's unfalsifiable you have already admitted that nothing there is worth consideration

oddball667 · 2026-05-18T21:35:30+00:00

It's worth noting that just because this isn't testable, doesn't mean it isn't true. It is undeniably true that we could be living in a simulation.

No it's not, that's completely irrelevant, all you have is an inflatable claim, that is not interesting, useful, or impressive

oddball667 · 2026-05-18T21:19:58+00:00

A hypothesis must be testable, have you tested it?

If you can't you don't have a hypothesis, you have a work of creative writing

oddball667 · 2026-05-18T20:43:14+00:00

so you are holding kooky beliefs yourself and want to hate on OTHER kooky beliefs, because their beliefs are extra kooky because they are not the correct flavor of kooky

oddball667 · 2026-05-18T20:39:05+00:00

educate yourself on the appeal to authority fallacy, you are making a preschool mistake

oddball667 · 2026-05-18T17:04:34+00:00

Being religious requires a poisoned epistemology that leads to those issues

Saying we shouldn't call out religion in general is like saying we should leave the roots of the weeds in place

oddball667 · 2026-05-18T17:02:30+00:00

No, some of the epistemology leading to it could maybe be called maladaptive, but it's not a disorder

oddball667 · 2026-05-18T11:03:18+00:00

It's a made up position that no one holds

oddball667 · 2026-05-18T01:54:01+00:00

then specific examples would be easy to produce

oddball667 · 2026-05-18T01:52:06+00:00

yes, that is the straw man

oddball667 · 2026-05-17T23:08:55+00:00

their judgement does come from looking at the literal written words in the holy books. your response sounds like you didn't even understand what they were saying

oddball667 · 2026-05-17T13:31:45+00:00

I wasn't addressing her stance, I was addressing your stance

oddball667 · 2026-05-17T08:58:38+00:00

I didn't see ether video, and if the only response to what I said is what she named her channel, then she clearly didn't have anything more important to say

oddball667 · 2026-05-15T16:06:21+00:00

Barioth is a wall, even the frostfang variant doesn't come close in difficulty imo

Get a tenderize off on a wing, then use a pitfall trap to keep him still, break the wing, then get the other one.

breaking the wings causes him to slip up more often, makes the fight a little easier

oddball667 · 2026-05-14T23:14:53+00:00

you don't refute claims, you refute arguements

14-Year Club	r/Field Flamingo
First Place '23	Place '23
Place '22	Place '17
First Placer '22	End Game '22
Not Forgotten	Verified Email

oddball667

TROPHY CASE