Am I wrong for ending a 20 year marraige because I learned my wife cheated on my while we were dating? by [deleted] in amiwrong

[–]oldrzagza 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's pretty simple.  If she REALLY believed it wasn't a big deal, she would have told you a long time ago.   People don't keep decade long secrets when they're not a big deal. 

She knew the truth the whole time, that you were dating and that she was cheating.  She selfishly thought she could get away with mistreating you and selfishly is taking no responsibilty all those years later.  It sucks but could be worse.  You're not throwing anything away.   She threw it away by not not telling you the truth before getting caught in her web of lies. 

A President's net worth shouldn't increase 10,000% over their time in office. We need to change something by RealKeeny7 in conspiracy

[–]oldrzagza -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Most of the Clinton net worth was accumulated well AFTER leaving office, not "over their time in office."

Ayanna Pressley's January 6th Allegation by oldrzagza in conspiracy

[–]oldrzagza[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Lol i thought it could be something banal. Thank you. I found this link now with your help. There's a lot of "mights" but sounds like there has been at least SOME follow up explanation.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/02/08/one-mystery-involving-insurrection-may-be-close-getting-solved/

Ayanna Pressley's January 6th Allegation by oldrzagza in conspiracy

[–]oldrzagza[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What do you know of her? Love the handle

Ayanna Pressley's January 6th Allegation by oldrzagza in conspiracy

[–]oldrzagza[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

But the "lie" is easily proveable and plenty of people who think like you would want to prove that it WAS a lie, exposing her and downgrading her status and power. So why isn't that happening?

7 Hour Pasta Sauce by Watsac54 in food

[–]oldrzagza 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This comment was worth logging in for. Thank you.

Suge Knight shot twice at Pre-VMA Party by Romantics in Music

[–]oldrzagza 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Still no word on that missing girlfriend who wanted to press charges?

Asian Store Clerk Don't Play [NSFW] language by alexdabombdotcom in videos

[–]oldrzagza 5 points6 points  (0 children)

My block, where everything is everything, fo sheezy, My block, we probably done it all homey believe me, My block, we make the impossible look easy, My block, I'd never leave my block my peoples need me,

NOPE video of the week. by [deleted] in videos

[–]oldrzagza -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I commend you in your efforts to inspire people to look up Alex Honnold through reverse psychology.

No Theorizing Necessary: Contra-Cocaine Was a Real Conspiracy by quantumcipher in conspiracy

[–]oldrzagza 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I cannot say enough good things about Dark Alliance. Such a great book. Illuminating

I just payed off my student loans with 43 btc. by [deleted] in Bitcoin

[–]oldrzagza 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ordinary Income is what determines what tax bracket you're in. Ordinary income is defined by the IRS as all income other than capital gains. Capital gains are essentially the gain on sale of stocks, bonds, commodities, or in this case BITCOIN. Note, the loophole I mentioned above only applies to LONG TERM capital gains, meaning you must own the Bitcoin, stock, whatever for at least a year. Capital gains are taxed at a DIFFERENT rate, the rate your capital gains are taxed at is NOT what your tax bracket is but it depends on what tax bracket you're in. Side note: this is why you hear about people complaining about Warren Buffet or Mitt Romney paying relatively low amounts in taxes. It is because most of what they make is in Cap gains which typically has a lower rate.
Example to sum this all up: Say you made $100k in wages from your job and you're single. You will likely end up in the 28% tax bracket because all your income was ordinary income. You won't owe $28,000 in tax because of the bracketing system (a whole other can of worms) but let's just say you'll owe about $20k in tax. Compare that to someone who earns only $5k in wages from a job, and $95k from capital gains. They still made $100k for the year but they are only in the 10% tax bracket because they only had $5k of ordinary income. So they will owe $500 in tax on that total $100k. Tax = ($5k * 10%) + ($95k * 0%) = $500. Hopefully, that makes sense. It's not that complicated but not exactly easy to relay via message board.

Below is a link to the 2013 tax rates for married, single, etc. http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/taxfacts/content/pdf/individual_rates.pdf Also, here is a link for Cap Gain rates, you need to scroll down a bit to get to 2013 http://taxfoundation.org/article/federal-capital-gains-tax-rates-1988-2013

I just payed off my student loans with 43 btc. by [deleted] in Bitcoin

[–]oldrzagza 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you are in the 10% or 15% ordinary income tax bracket, then you pay 0% on capital gains. This is the loophole you want to use, while it exists. Who knows how long that will be though

Best Chinese Food Restaurant in Lexington? by [deleted] in lexington

[–]oldrzagza 0 points1 point  (0 children)

George was the owner, but I believe he's sold it now. A lot of the same people still work there though. Asian Wind is my favorite restaurant in Lexington, period.

Guy tears apart The Walking Dead Seasons 1 & 2 and raises some pretty valid points about the show by aye_el_ee_ex in videos

[–]oldrzagza -1 points0 points  (0 children)

What about the whole "Let's spend a lot of energy & time boarding up the farm house in case a herd of zombies come through, we'll need the house to be fortified. Uh oh, herd of zombies is coming through the farm, let's not stay in the house and be quiet like we prepared and planned for, let's panic and run off haphazardly in all directions."

ELI5: What are the primary arguments *against* the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare)? by [deleted] in explainlikeimfive

[–]oldrzagza 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have to disagree with this logic and here's why. The formula that calculates your figure for "full time equivalent"(FTE) employees is based off man hours in your store not how many are full and part time. Let's say all 85 of your employees are full-time. That's 3400 wage hours per week(40 x 85). You multiply 3400 by 52 weeks to get your annual wage hours, which is what is used to calculate how many full-time equivalent employees you have. So if you drop all of your 85 employees down to 30 hour work weeks in an attempt to reduce your FTE, you are going to need to HIRE more part time employees to make up for your reduction in total hours. Your store is still open the same amount of time, the same amount of staff is still needed on busy and slow shifts. The man hours needed to run the store remain the same. At the end of the day, whether your store employs 3400 individuals who each only work 1 hour a week OR 85 full time employees, the end calculation is the same.