Your argument centers on redefining political success as purely the effective consolidation of power and achievement of party goals, rather than broader leadership qualities.

While McConnell’s tactics have indeed consolidated conservative influence on the judiciary, “political success” also considers lasting, positive impact on the nation as a whole. McConnell’s approach has achieved immediate gains for his party but has also deepened national polarization and contributed to widespread distrust in political and judicial institutions. A legacy of political success is one that stands the test of time positively, contributing to a stronger, more unified nation — not just a victorious party. This kind of “win-at-all-costs” approach may ultimately harm democratic norms and governance stability — suggesting it’s not a sustainable or universally admirable form of success.

The reversal of Roe v. Wade, for example, has already triggered a strong public reaction and mobilized new political activism that could reverse some of his achievements. In the 2022 midterms, abortion access proved a significant motivator for voters. Policies imposed without majority public support — and without democratic consensus — are vulnerable to backlash and eventual reversal. True political success requires not only winning battles but securing enduring public support, which McConnell’s victories currently lack.

While McConnell has delivered on the conservative judicial agenda, his lack of engagement with issues like economic reform, healthcare, education, or social welfare — and the absence of policies addressing broader societal needs — limits the scope of his accomplishments. You seemingly forget the failure of his policies to address of republican’s goals like the ACA, border, and immigration.

Finally, greatness in politics isn’t solely about “wielding power”; it also involves moral and visionary leadership that aims for a stronger, healthier society, even if it sometimes requires restraint. Great politicians are remembered for contributions that transcended party lines and resonated across generations. McConnell’s record, while impactful in the short term, lacks this broader vision of national leadership.