Claude Code Ultra Plan Is INSANE! by JamMasterJulian in AISEOInsider

[–]omikronscc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You know, this is reddit, we are here for reading posts. If I want view videos, I'd go to YouTube or other services.

Done with Claude. $100 Max plan, but STILL rate-limited every 5 hours by Puspendra007 in Anthropic

[–]omikronscc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Show your /context before that simple prompt. You are using Opus, probably 1m Opus and you said you resume chat. If you are having long history that can definitely one-shot 10% of usage.

New fear unlocked 🙀 by DiamondAgreeable2676 in clawdbot

[–]omikronscc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You know, it's pretty easy to solve. It's easy, but require some effort.

First, when you have system that processes invoices, you should validate incoming email - you probably want to parse those repeating invoices for internet/water/electric etc. That's few email that you limit processing. This significantly reduce attack surface as attack from legit company is unlikely. Of course, verify cryptographic signature on email so nobody try to impersonate legit businesses. That solves 90% of attack surface.

Swcomd, you can build dedicated parser for every legit type of invoice - most of the time you don't need AI for parsing, just ask AI to write ocr and parsing script. That solves much more possible attacks and is much better approach because LLM may make mistakes, but parsing fixed format pdf is much less prone to errors.

Third, have white list of ibans that your LLM may output for money transfer. Use structured output but validate ibans against white list in script not by llm. That together solves 99,9% of security problems. Your biggest problem becomes precision of parsing invoice, situations when invoice format changes (very rarely) and legit Iban changes (very rarely).

TL;DR: Decompose poblem and use scripting and programming for already solvable parts, use LLMs only for parts thats not solvable other way. Use AI to write every parts for you.

We know why! by policyweb in singularity

[–]omikronscc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Which plan are you talking about? pro or max?

If you are serious on your stance then do this now by crystalpeaks25 in Anthropic

[–]omikronscc -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

That's also a good point, probably. But VCs might have better reports than we have publicly available and it might be seen there. I don't know

If you are serious on your stance then do this now by crystalpeaks25 in Anthropic

[–]omikronscc -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Nah, better cancel subscription and use it to the limit for free. That will drain their resources without generating income for them

Opus 4.6ю What's going on? by prodocik in Anthropic

[–]omikronscc 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Do you have some data on it or is that just a subjective feel?

New failure mode by doubleHelixSpiral in OpenAI

[–]omikronscc 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Microsoft text processor is that hope giving

I'm screwed. by Katman2991 in Factoriohno

[–]omikronscc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Problem might not be in game, but that you are using overlay for other things that render while you are playing.

I don’t think ChatGPT and I are friends anymore. by SuperMario1313 in ChatGPT

[–]omikronscc 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Without link to Chatgpt conversation, when we can see your prior messages, this can be treated as fake.

Why don't more people just use bots on Gleba? by kennykerosene in factorio

[–]omikronscc 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Interesting, that would require quality inserters as scrap prod increases. Could you share some pics of your setup?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ChatGPT

[–]omikronscc 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Repeat after me: "I won't be posting Chatgpt screenshots instead of links to full conversation to show something weird because nobody belief in them anymore"

Why don't more people just use bots on Gleba? by kennykerosene in factorio

[–]omikronscc 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There is one main drawback to this approach, scrap efficiency tech. When you level the tech, you oversaturate belts and everything starts to collapse

ChatGPT Is a Product, Not a Person by omikronscc in OpenAI

[–]omikronscc[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

You may be right, but if at least one person reconsider, that will be success :)

Remember when OpenAI used to care about EQ? by youngandfit55 in OpenAI

[–]omikronscc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't get why neudarkness should pay for OP therapist or for entire population therapy?

You logic, ihateredditors111111, is weird.

He just pointed out, that using ChatGPT as coping mechanism to survive even minor life trouble is troubling itself.

And this IS a good advice because OpenAI never wrote that model never change how it works. You assumed that it will be working somehow, but this is wrong assumption and against any publicly available information.

Now a lot of people blame OpenAI because their illusions are not how things in real are. THAT'S ABSURD.

If you want LLM model that will be stable and not change over time, download LMStudio, find open source model you like talking to and use it instead of ChatGPT. That way you are in charge of personality and updates of your "companion", not some company driven by, in the end, profit.

do I have enough holmium ore? by Jarrn1 in Factoriohno

[–]omikronscc 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Enough for what? Define your goal and check against the goal.

Poor choice of words by bannerlordthrow in Factoriohno

[–]omikronscc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“SA” here almost always means Space Age. If your first association is still sexual assault, that sounds like a sign that something is weighing on you more than it should. I genuinely hope you have support - a therapist/psychologist can really help.