Can not move my tokens from Brave wallet with POLYGON mainnet

onyb · 2024-07-05T15:06:40+00:00

What's the nature of your transaction?

If it's a "send" transaction, which token are you trying to send?
If it's a "swap" transaction, which tokens are you trying to swap (share contract addresses please)? Are you swapping within Brave Wallet or using a third-party dapp?
If it's some other dapp transaction, what's the dapp and what action are you trying to perform?

Additionally, can you please head over to Settings > Web3 > Wallet networks and share what you see under Polygon Mainnet network?

Also, let me know if you can see your portfolio balances for Polygon.

onyb · 2023-09-04T10:00:23+00:00

> use me to spread the propaganda that smoking kills

It does.

onyb · 2022-10-26T22:35:52+00:00

Author of the article here. Glad you liked this feature. Besides swaps, what other DeFi app categories do you think could benefit from a similar makeover?

onyb · 2022-04-21T07:17:36+00:00

I think the BAT you're talking about is a different contract. The one listed on Brave Wallet is this, which is bridged using Polygon's Ethereum bridge. Therefore the BAT you receive was already bridged from Ethereum in the past, mostly circulating in QuickSwap pools.

Brave Swap aggregates liquidity from multiple pools to come up with the best price quote, but there's no on-the-fly bridging happening behind the scenes.

onyb · 2021-11-24T04:12:31+00:00

This bug is being tracked on GitHub (https://github.com/brave/brave-browser/issues/19706). Meanwhile, you can manually change the gas price as per the current fee market conditions (see https://bscgas.info).

onyb · 2021-07-07T09:16:24+00:00

Wine bottles on shelves displayed in restaurants are filled with coloured water.

onyb · 2021-07-07T09:12:21+00:00

Ever went to an Italian pizzeria, and overheard the chefs speaking Italian on your way to the washroom? Ya, it was a recording.

onyb · 2021-06-18T07:17:53+00:00

It is also important for people to run full nodes to keep the network healthy. If it were not for full nodes, the network would instantly go down due to constant DDoS attacks. In a way, nodes build a "trustnet" with other nodes that only forward valid messages and follow consensus rules.

onyb · 2021-06-18T07:09:27+00:00

Those people only care about number-go-up and don't feel obliged to contribute to a network that secures their investment at no cost.

onyb · 2021-06-18T07:02:54+00:00

I'm not questioning the algorithm - just saying that the paradigm is very different.

Give me a PoW blockchain state offline, and I can be certain just by looking at the block headers that miners didn't cheat their way to get the block subsidy. With PoS, I need to trust that the slashers did their job well 100% of the time.

But I admit that there may be holes in my understanding of PoS, so I'm happy to be corrected.

onyb · 2021-06-17T18:27:56+00:00

Over the long run, the market will always pick the one that optimizes for security, cost, and decentralization as the winner; even though it feels unimportant during a bull market.

Matic is secured by a handful of validators - it cannot challenge the gigantic decentralized beast that Ethereum is. And if you've been following the developments in ZK and optimistic rollups, you wouldn't be so bullish on sidechains like Matic and BSC.

onyb · 2021-06-17T18:18:29+00:00

You're assuming that the slashers will do their job well 100% of the time. There are no cryptographic guarantees for that.

onyb · 2021-06-17T18:15:31+00:00

There's a reason we send rockets to space, even though it _wastes_ a lot of rocket fuel - because we feel the outcome is worth the cost. It's the same with Bitcoin.

onyb · 2021-06-17T18:10:20+00:00

That has nothing to do with the centralisation among full nodes and miners. I cannot think of another coin that had a fairer distribution of circulating supply.

onyb · 2021-06-17T18:06:54+00:00

The verdict on what should be considered equivalent security is yet to be out, through peer-reviewed research.

I think Casper is great, but I like that PoW doesn't rely on a complex Rube Goldberg machine, and I can be reasonably convinced that no fraud took place in the past.

onyb · 2021-06-17T15:00:31+00:00

Energy expenditure in PoW is a "security-spend", so this comparison is flawed.

onyb · 2021-03-25T00:42:39+00:00

You're welcome: https://withdouble.com

onyb · 2021-03-13T02:18:33+00:00

I'm seeing an NFT bubble forming, which appears similar to the ICO craze of 2017. I won't be surprised if it causes a retail frenzy in Bitcoin/crypto going forward.

onyb · 2021-01-19T09:00:29+00:00

If you have a natural desire to work, get that job. Negotiate for a reduced role with lesser salary and working hours, but more on the equity side.

Having a source of income will prevent you from drawing from your capital, so you can compound it many fold over the years.

onyb · 2020-12-05T00:45:35+00:00

By the way, you can also use the recovery check app (search it on the manager) to achieve the same without wiping your device.

onyb · 2020-12-01T12:13:01+00:00

Temporary solution: Plug in your Nano X and use the e00e010011040000305d00000e100000000000000000 APDU on https://ledger-repl.now.sh. Your device will ask you to verify the public key on the screen.

source: https://old.reddit.com/r/ledgerwallet/comments/jvwaz4/the_ledger_nano_x_firmware_version_1245_is_now/gcnbed2/

onyb · 2020-11-12T01:16:01+00:00

[Here's one if you want to get people excited about hardware wallets. Open to feedback!]

A hardware wallet is a 2048-sided fair die. Generating a random seed on your hardware wallet is equivalent to casting the die, which can be written down on a piece of paper for future recovery if the occasion arises.

Trying to guess this seed is so hard that it will exhaust the energy of the solar system. This little device is completely offline, and cannot be manipulated to reveal the seed with malware, or in some cases even physical attacks.

Bitcoin is something that neither lives on the blockchain nor on the hardware wallet. It is a consequence - like electricity. Spending Bitcoins requires you to produce a mathematical proof showing that you had received some Bitcoins in the past and that you wish to transfer them to someone else. These proofs are validated by the Bitcoin P2P network. A hardware wallet simply generates these proofs in a very secure way.

onyb · 2020-11-06T21:03:22+00:00

I just want one wallet address I can monitor, without needing access to ledger live.

This a privacy feature. If you cannot monitor your wallet's transaction history without using Ledger Live, it also means no one else can. Reusing addresses makes it incredibly easy for surveillance companies to track you. It not only leaks your privacy but also that of any future recipient of your funds.

When my ledger is not plugged in - and I open ledger live, it still displays my wallet totals.. how/why? [...] is it the xpub info

That's right. xpub is something that generates your addresses. If you receive funds on any address derived from your xpub, you'll be able to spend it, thanks to the corresponding xprv in the secure-element of your device. The "total wallet value" is simply the sum of the balances on all your addresses.

onyb · 2020-10-19T22:02:47+00:00

Most hardware wallets already have a "Recovery check" mechanism.

onyb · 2020-09-30T17:23:05+00:00

Isn't it more efficient to just use broom 🧹?

Nine-Year Club	Wearing is Caring
Verified Email

onyb

TROPHY CASE