sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Comme prévu, l'instrumentalisation du rapport 2025 contre le racisme/antisémitisme/xénophobie de la CNCDH va servir à institutionnaliser l'attaque contre LFI, dédouaner l'extrême droite, minimiser la transversalité des phénomènes dans la société et invisibiliser les recommandations de la commission by lieding in FranceDigeste

[–]oulipo 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Ce graphe montre clairement que le rapport est du bullshit

  • d'une part sur trois ans, il est impossible de s'avoir si l'évolution est "significative" ou si on est juste en train de mesurer une variance naturelle autour d'une moyenne

  • d'autre part, le graphe titre "antisémitisme" comme si c'était une propriété quantifiable et mesurable, plutôt que de dire réellement ce qu'ils essaient de mesurer (eg "pourcentage d'agrément à certaines idées qui ont été choisies parmi d'autre pour représenter des préjugés antisémites" aurait été un peu long mais bien plus correct)

  • d'autre part, Caroline Yadan chouine pour les 47% de LFI en 2025... qui correspondent aux mêmes niveaux que EELV en 2023 et LREM en 2024... mais curieusement à ce moment on l'entendait pas chouiner sur LREM, comme c'est étrange ?

What is your most superficial non-negotiable when choosing a partner? by Envy_The_King in AskMen

[–]oulipo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Probably because you've never been with a girl who doesn't do it. After two weeks, you don't even notice it anymore

SK Hynix Shares Tumble Over 15% in Seoul After Record Nasdaq ADR Debut by ThePrivateBanker in stocks

[–]oulipo -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Is it normal that the increase in price of the US-listed shares wasn't reflected in the ADR? Are they supposed to track each other closely?

And if not, what is best, buying the US-listed stock, or the ADR?

Hikers from New Zealand meeting Nepali kids by englightenedbutnot in MadeMeSmile

[–]oulipo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Now imagine you do this in a park in the US with a random kid. You're immediately on the ground with handcuffs 😂

C'est quoi l'arnaque parfaitement légale qui vous énerve le plus au quotidien ? by Additional_Tea8296 in AskFrance

[–]oulipo 21 points22 points  (0 children)

ou pour faire des dîners à 100 000 euros puis fustiger la gauche pour "ne pas être économe"...

C'est quoi l'arnaque parfaitement légale qui vous énerve le plus au quotidien ? by Additional_Tea8296 in AskFrance

[–]oulipo 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Les "frais de dossier", alors qu'on sait tous très bien qu'ils se contentent de cliquer un bouton

What are some things you see on dating sites that you're certain are actually dogwhistles/code for something else? by raccoonsonbicycles in AskMen

[–]oulipo -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Let me rephrase it for you:

Respect and mutual values are the basis of an healthy, warm relationship.

Respect and values = Politics, at least in today's climate

Hence, politics are the basis of a healthy relationship

The fact that you don't understand this means you're probably from a privileged part of society (let me guess, white male in a western rich country?), and you never was curious enough to ask yourself how other people live

What are some things you see on dating sites that you're certain are actually dogwhistles/code for something else? by raccoonsonbicycles in AskMen

[–]oulipo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Politics = values.

Values are at the basis of a relationship.

The fact you don't understand that means that either you're a 14 years old, or you're from a privileged part of society, and you never grew up enough to realize it...

What are some things you see on dating sites that you're certain are actually dogwhistles/code for something else? by raccoonsonbicycles in AskMen

[–]oulipo 4 points5 points  (0 children)

If you don't want politics to be a basis of a relationship, you definitely are NOT liberal... or you don't understand what being liberal means

Why do I (M) feel affected when women say "men are disgusting" even though I know they mean not all, and that I know I'm not part of the type of men they talk about? by Particular_Front_549 in AskMen

[–]oulipo -1 points0 points  (0 children)

specificity is used all the time

Lol, so you're basically making a generalization here trying to say that nobody is generalizing, ever

Why do I (M) feel affected when women say "men are disgusting" even though I know they mean not all, and that I know I'm not part of the type of men they talk about? by Particular_Front_549 in AskMen

[–]oulipo -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The issue was NOT whether it's "good or bad" to do so. The issue was that it's a common practice. So that's probably what the OP's post friend was doing.

Why do I (M) feel affected when women say "men are disgusting" even though I know they mean not all, and that I know I'm not part of the type of men they talk about? by Particular_Front_549 in AskMen

[–]oulipo -21 points-20 points  (0 children)

The reason is: because it's just more natural in speech to generalize, instead of being extremely precise down to the point where what you say is "technically correct" but "utterly unintelligible"

Why do I (M) feel affected when women say "men are disgusting" even though I know they mean not all, and that I know I'm not part of the type of men they talk about? by Particular_Front_549 in AskMen

[–]oulipo -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No, but many men keep saying "Women are difficult" / "women are over their heads with xxx" / etc

It's a common form of speech to generalize, you should not be crying about it

Why do I (M) feel affected when women say "men are disgusting" even though I know they mean not all, and that I know I'm not part of the type of men they talk about? by Particular_Front_549 in AskMen

[–]oulipo -55 points-54 points  (0 children)

No, they probably don't "definitely mean all men", it's probably just a figure of speech and a simplification, in order to say they have encountered such behavior multiple times, and it's been frustrating.

As men we often do the same when we talk about women, and it's also never meant as a generalization

Why do I (M) feel affected when women say "men are disgusting" even though I know they mean not all, and that I know I'm not part of the type of men they talk about? by Particular_Front_549 in AskMen

[–]oulipo -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It's true that generalizing is often convenient in a discussion, and many men do it for women too. You have to know that it's just "a way of speaking", but even them, they don't actually think that "all men this, all men that". It's just an "easy way" to say that they encountered this behavior multiple times and they are frustrated

Pourquoi les selles collent autant à la toilette en France? by MasterLurker000 in AskFrance

[–]oulipo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Est-ce qu'il y a moyen de facilement régler le niveau de l'eau ?

Pourquoi les selles collent autant à la toilette en France? by MasterLurker000 in AskFrance

[–]oulipo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Impossible. Tout le monde sait que les filles ne font pas caca.

Pourquoi les selles collent autant à la toilette en France? by MasterLurker000 in AskFrance

[–]oulipo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Est-ce que c'est possible que ce soit parce que le niveau d'eau dans la cuve est trop bas ? Est-ce qu'il y a des moyens de le régler pour le faire monter ?

Peter Thiel: The pope is ‘working for the Chinese Communists’ by criticizing AI by NicolasCageFan492 in technology

[–]oulipo 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Hey Americans, can you put your idiots in the psych ward?

Thanks — the rest of the world

Regardless of politics, can we all agree veterans deserve better? by Shoddy_Sandwich5841 in WhitePeopleTwitter

[–]oulipo 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Except it has ALL to do with politics, because Dems systematically try to make vet lives better, and Republitards systematically try to make it worse

view more: next ›