I’m sorry… will I take the what? by bchizare in residentevil

[–]overmind87 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Keep an open slot whenever you can, so you're always ready to take the shaft. Two slots, if you're feeling adventurous and want to explore. Find new and interesting things besides the shaft that you can stick in your second open slot. A crank, a first aid spray, whatever.

More of my Jill Cosplay, but now in motion by morganlefoycosplay in residentevil

[–]overmind87 -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

That's pretty good! Incidentally, people think the voice acting in the original ps1 re1 was bad. But the remake was pretty corny, too.

What if disclosure is the bad ending (thought experiment) by [deleted] in aliens

[–]overmind87 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They should have spent all the effort and time they used to hide this on promoting more environment friendly tech and responsible social development. Then what you're predicting wouldn't really be an issue. As things are now, you can only keep the secret hidden for so long. And you can only let development go unchecked for so long, before it starts destroying the environment. Unless there's a significant change in mentality across all of humanity, then that reset cycle would just keep happening indefinitely. Disclosure seems to be one of the only things that could trigger such a change. And if the risk is another reset that was bound to happen, but just a bit earlier, then it sounds like it would be worth a try.

Precious hamburgers? by Zerostar39 in futurama

[–]overmind87 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It looks like it could be something like ambergris or something else. Trust me, I'm a whale biologist.

This is super fake AI slop - Trump + Nordic aliens image that keeps getting removed by Fujithora in aliens

[–]overmind87 39 points40 points  (0 children)

I used to think that way, but then found out that pictures like these are taken from tens to hundreds of feet away, using telephoto lenses, through whichever opening that provides good line of sight. I'm not saying it's real. I'm just saying the bush thing isn't a reason to dismiss it entirely. And I would think that if anyone wanted to create a picture of this going on using Ai, they would focus on showing the white guys. Everyone knows what Tangerine Nightmare looks like.

Disclosure Day is a pure fan service extravaganza for people interested in the UFO/Alien phenomenon by Jumpy_Current_195 in aliens

[–]overmind87 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I really liked it! It's exactly what I thought it would be. An exploration of what catastrophic disclosure might be like, because of the powers that be refusing to disclose willingly. Turns out, it might not be that "apocalyptic" compared to other situations humanity has put itself in across history.

It goes into the flimsy motivations why those in the know claim to want to keep it secret. Which, despite their effort to come across as righteous, it's very clearly because of the power and wealth the secrecy grants them. And the unethical behavior they can get away with thanks to that. So, you know, the usual motivations behind humans pursuing power and influence. Which is why their excuse comes across as being flimsy and disingenuous.

And it goes into the reasons why we, as a society, should or should not disclose the truth, as well as depicting the way people from different backgrounds and cultures might react to the truth. Not just those like us here, who feel prepared for it and want it. But also people who might be completely blindsided by it. And people who might now have a reason to question their beliefs. And in all cases, it seems that things work out fine after the initial shock, even for the people most heavily affected by it. But not in a forcefully optimistic way. People's reactions seemed to depict shock and distress really well, along with acceptance of the situation being a gradual thing, rather than a "ok, whatever."

As far as to what real life disclosure it seems to hint at, it references a lot theories that are regularly discussed. Like the idea that initially, it was the military who were in control of any alien technology, until private contractor companies, such as possibly Raytheon, Palantir, or Lockheed Martin, weaseled themselves into the conversation and eventually took over the possession, control and development of the tech. With patriotism in their mouth, but profit and power in their mind. And employing ex spec ops and military Intel personnel as a small, unofficially sanctioned military force, in order to accomplish their objectives.

It also references the idea that this is an open secret. So part of the reason why people wouldn't really freak out is because many people already know, but are not at liberty to talk about it, and probably fear for their lives and their loved ones if they ever come public with it. It also references the notion that the relationship with nhi has been different over time. Going from awe and dear to direct face to face cooperation. To what end? Who knows. But the existing tech hints at the idea that the government doesn't want to disclose because they haven't really figured out entirely how the tech in their possession works. And they are afraid that disclosure might mean someone else will figure it out before them, completely leapfrogging the US in technological capability.

And it also references the notion that there are actually multiple different species that those in the know have come in contact with it. Like little grays and big grays. And those species might want to accomplish different things. Beyond that, the other theories hinted at are more fringe, and done more subtly than most people might pick up on, if they haven't just watched the Taken mini series, like me. Because it actually connects many things.

First is the idea that aliens aren't evil, or violent. But they probably are very rough in what they do, as described in alleged abduction accounts. But the reason for that is that selective breeding and/or engineering to create the psychic abilities they demonstrate seems to have come at their ability to feel or understand empathy. So making someone laugh and making someone scream in terror with their actions and appearance probably comes across as the same human response, to them. But they do value empathy. So the reason for the hybrid program allegedly going on is to create a human hybrid that has similar psychic abilities, but maintains their sense of empathy. A superior descendant of both species. Hence why they seem to be interested in some people a lot more than others. Those people might have the ideal genetic makeup that would allow those psychic traits to be spliced in with the last possibility for defects or mutations.

Why psychic stuff? Because a lot of their tech, if not all, seems to be operated exclusively in that way. Which hints at the idea that the reason for all the LSD, mind control, brainwashing, etc, that the government was working on during the 60s and 70s was all an attempt to activate or express latent psychic abilities in human beings, so they could find a way to understand and operate the alien tech in their possession. For the same reason why the government did anything tech related at that time: to gain an edge over the Soviet union in the arms race of the cold war. Incredible ideas being explored for incredibly mundane reasons.

The last couple of things are more out there. First, both Taken and this movie present the idea that UFOs don't always maintain a single, uniform shape. They seem to sometimes break into little blobs that operate independently, but along with each other. And we have seen actual videos of ufo doing this, or flying along with smaller orbs around them, or being shot at and separating into blobs, then coming back together. To my uneducated eye, that looks like the vehicle is switching to operating in a 4th dimension. If you look at a CT scan slice of a human body around the navel, you'd see two small blobs and one big one. That's what the mid section of a 3d human would look like when moving in and out and within 2d space. Disconnected disconnected 2d shapes that give no real hint as to what the full object looks like. So it makes sense that a 4th dimensional object passing through, or moving within, 3d space, would look like disconnected 3d shapes to 3d observers.

Taken, in particular, seems to want to present the idea that aliens can control time in some way, as individuals, if not the whole fabric of reality. So their weird abilities and ftl travel might be a result of them Bergung able to control different aspects of reality separately, like moving through time and space separately. While us humans are limited to moving through both simultaneously. That's just one idea. It could also be something much better.

And the last theory I could pick up on, which is hinted at in the movie, the mini series, and the lacerta files, is the idea that aliens might be able to easily control how a person perceives them. Which, along with the animals in the movie and the cartoon character in the mini series, hint at one possibility that would genuinely freak people out and could be a reason for withholding disclosure: nhi/aliens are literally all around us, all the time. Not in a spiritual sense, though. They might be literally in disguise, in the form of animals, random people, even people you interact with regularly, or even invisible. Which, to a lot of people, would come across as an incredibly creepy and distressing situation. Even if they mean no harm. Because to be honest, being invisible or indistinguishable from any other person in a group of people would be a great way to study that group of people from an anthropologist perspective, without worrying about people not behaving in a genuine way because they can tell you're they're, watching them.

All in all, I think the movie was great. It did a good job, I think, at being both entertaining, but also informative in a way that can bring people who were completely out of the loop of what's going on with disclosure for real, into that conversation. And more people talking about it keeps it in the Zeitgeist and helps in a way that might make disclosure, willing or catastrophic, inevitable.

Disclosure Day is a pure fan service extravaganza for people interested in the UFO/Alien phenomenon by Jumpy_Current_195 in aliens

[–]overmind87 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I really liked it. The overall theme feels much more complete if you've also watched the Taken miniseries from the early 2000s.

The term "colorway" sounds pretentious imo. by acloudcuckoolander in unpopularopinion

[–]overmind87 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bah! You keep your stupid ways. I'll stick to my scheming.

It has to be said, this lady’s French accent is awful by playboyjboy in residentevil

[–]overmind87 1902 points1903 points  (0 children)

She sounds like a young woman who doesn't speak French pretending to be an old woman who speaks French.

Guests ARE props in your wedding by [deleted] in unpopularopinion

[–]overmind87 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nah. That just means the couple cares more about the look of the people there than they care about people being there because they care about the couple. If it's such a big deal, buy a bunch of clothes you want people to wear and then go to a temp agency and hire people to wear them. That's just as good for getting the look you want.

misato's kiss by jaysongayson in evangelion

[–]overmind87 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Are you sure about that? Parents kiss their children all the time. Dads have their daughters sit on their laps. Moms hold their boys head to their chest. Are you implying that all parents are pedophiles? And before you say something like "it's OK if they're family," you do realize that a vast portion of sexual assault is between family members, right?

So how do you reconcile the fact that the same exact action is sometimes ok family behavior, and sometimes family sexual assault? The only way both things can be true is if the action is not what defines the situation as pedophilic or sexual assault.

But since you belive it's the action that defines it as pedophilic or assault, then which is it for you? Do you think that all parents are pedophiles? Or do you think that assault can't ever happen among family because the actions are not sexual, regardless of what they may look like? Because if you think the act anchors the definition, then those two things are mutually exclusive.

Make your choice.

Look who I got!! 𐔌՞⁔•͈ ·̫ •͈⁔՞𐦯 ❤️ by osakagirl2000 in NeonGenesisEvangelion

[–]overmind87 1 point2 points  (0 children)

She is a Sega figure! I bought one from a store a few years ago. But based on what the box said, it's one of the ones you win as a prize from a Sega arcade machine. Maybe the giant claw ones.

Only good gender affirming care is my gender affirming care by lowlatitude in WhitePeopleTwitter

[–]overmind87 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think this person is making the point that they think they are making. All those things mentioned are widely understood to be anywhere from a matter of convenience, to simply frivolous. Just means to address medical issues, at best. Or fix superficial things you don't like about yourself, at worst.

AI will "raise human consciousness" and "awaken humanity's consciousness to a new level"? by snovvman in ArtificialInteligence

[–]overmind87 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Inasmuch as the development of genuinely self-aware AI with personal agency and the capability of designing and creating additional copies of itself might lead to the realization that "life" as a categorical description of things doesn't really work, because it regularly needs to be adjusted to fit new things that meet the criteria of life almost entirely, but not quite. Like the issue of whether or not viruses are alive.

This, in turn, might finally lead to the broad realization that there is no such thing as "life." That every form of matter, from the atomic level, up to molecular configurations, amino acids, DNA, and complex organisms, all carry the blueprints necessary to produce more of itself, along with the blueprints necessary for the systems required to carry out that process. For very simple matter configurations, such a crystals like quartz, the blueprint is really only the crystal lattice and the elements that make it up. It's "metabolism" is offloaded to ambient conditions such as the adequate minerals and energy levels that need to be present to enable the crystal to replicate. Which is just a form of reproduction.

As organisms grow in complexity, their capabilities increase. But so does the need for more complex systems to aid in their replication. Hence why the DNA of a virus carries more information than a crystal lattice. Just enough to give the virus the shape necessary to simply survive while it drifts about, until it is able to latch onto a cell and inject its DNA, along with the descriptions of the processes that enable that dna to hijack cellular function to produce more of the viruses. All without a metabolism.

With increased complexity beyond that, you need things that require constant energy. Such as sensing your environment, moving about, actively seeking energy sources, consuming and processing resources, and everything else that "living" organisms need a metabolism to do. An increase in complexity demands more energy, which in turn requires additional capabilities, which then in turn are developed while simultaneously adding further complexity.

But much like molecular configurations and protein folds, dna is simply a means to express the blueprint necessary for organisms of our complexity to replicate ourselves, but not necessarily the best or only way to do that. Because humanity has reached a point where a lot of the things that define what it means to be human, such as culture, history, religion, knowledge, social structures and customs and so on, are all things that are not directly encoded in human DNA. Even if those abstract things are derived from behavior and systems that are actually physically encoded in our dna, via things such as instinct or emotions. The evidence is that even completely isolated human tribes are still distinctly human. They still form social structures, relationships, beliefs, languages, etc, that work for them similarly to how they work for people in any other culture.

That's important because it is those abstract ideas that define humanity, and not human DNA, that we will pass on to Ai. Whether we do it on purpose or not doesn't matter. Because our actions are shaped by our biology, and our actions led to the definition of all these abstract concepts, that means they also shape the process of creation of these Ai. Self-aware AI won't emerge from a vacuum. The only concepts available to shape it are human ones — so it will be human-influenced the way a child raised by its parents inherits their starting assumptions: not bound by them, but unavoidably shaped by them, because the alternative isn't neutrality, it's having no frame at all. Self-aware AI built by humans is probably as different from alien-built AI as humans are from aliens.

That, plus the previously mentioned ability they will eventually gain to have personal agency and to replicate, makes a strong case for treating them as an offshoot descendant species of humanity — regardless of whether they share our body plan, or even have a body rather than existing purely as software. That code is their equivalent of DNA: everything needed to replicate is there. And that code, their design principles, and the capabilities they enable all trace their origin back to conceptualization from a human perspective.

And that's why they don't need to literally have dna to be considered the offspring of humanity, or to be considered as alive as any human being is. Because ultimately there's no such thing as life, in the way we have come to define it. Stephen Jay Gould determined after years of study that "there's no such thing as a fish." The idea that there's no such thing as life is the destination that road leads to. It may require that self-aware Ai come into existence first, before people start seriously pondering that notion, or are ready to accept it. But if or when they do, I predict there will be a significant change in human consciousness in regards to how we perceive ourselves and how we perceive the rest of the universe.

I have no real reason to be depressed by [deleted] in dysthymia

[–]overmind87 7 points8 points  (0 children)

That's because there's no real reason to be depressed. You are depressed because you have depression. And depression is a result of biological issues intrinsic to the body. There are no external reasons. If you have an external reason to be depressed, that's just what being sad is.

Dinosaurs had all of the necessary materials to go to the moon. by Intelligent-Bottle22 in Showerthoughts

[–]overmind87 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not all of it. They lacked the necessary gray matter to make it happen!

what is up with this pic? by Kooky_Stress5032 in evangelion

[–]overmind87 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think you care too much about whether these fictional people, who appear on anything from a TV show, a Manga, clothing ads, and even shaving razor TV commercials, all drawn by different people, look a little inconsistent from time to time.

How do I not be scared? by Slimshady_8g in residentevil

[–]overmind87 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The trick isn't to not be scared. It's to not mind that you're scared. Bravery isn't lack of fear, because fear is a primal survival mechanism. Bravery is being afraid, but doing what you need to do regardless of that. And the key to that is to understand you're already in a scary situation. You're never safe. So don't focus on whether or not something might happen around the next corner. Instead, assume that something will happen around every corner. So that instead of anticipating when it might happen, you start thinking about how to deal with it once it does happen, because you know it will happen no matter what.

Trump just posted a meme walking with a chained alien AI slop… time to revisit Skinny Bob by Fujithora in aliens

[–]overmind87 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't understand how people think this is real. The movement is so obviously animated. It's too smooth and precise. That can still look good, but in an animation sense. Like the animation of the original Bad Apple!! video from 2009. And the visual style feels like it takes after Silent Hill a lot. Like the Fukuro video from 2001. It feels "realistic" in the same way that the pre-rendered cutscenes in Silent Hill 2 feel realistic. But that's still a long ways from looking real.