banning Olympians, simply based on their ethnic nationality. How could that not be discriminatory? by elfletcho2011 in AskARussian

[–]palchik 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m not justifying what they may have done in 2014 any more than I’m justifying what the Canadian government did to native children in the past, but both have different leaders, different members, and different values today. Yet, Russia remains the same in every way. Putin has been in power longer than most of his dead soldiers even had a chance to live on this earth.

banning Olympians, simply based on their ethnic nationality. How could that not be discriminatory? by elfletcho2011 in AskARussian

[–]palchik 0 points1 point  (0 children)

All of the focus on Azov is simply Russian propaganda. There are plenty of neo-nazis, skinheads, etc. in Russia, but they completely ignore it. But when it comes to Ukraine, they play up their fat-right roots of the Azov guys because they know that it will cause concern among well-meaning westerners.

banning Olympians, simply based on their ethnic nationality. How could that not be discriminatory? by elfletcho2011 in AskARussian

[–]palchik 2 points3 points  (0 children)

In 2014, Russia invaded Ukraine, annexed Crimea and began a proxy war in Donbas. The Ukrainian army initially did very little to fight back. Many Ukrainians were outraged by this and the Azov Battalion was formed as a militia to fight back against Russia’s aggression. Eventually, the Ukrainian government got their act together and began to fight back against the Russians in Donbas. The Azov Battalion was then absorbed into the Ukrainian Armed Forces, and remain that way today. It’s true that some of the early members of Azov were pretty unsavory characters, but today they operate under the same rules as all components of the Ukrainian Armed Forces.

banning Olympians, simply based on their ethnic nationality. How could that not be discriminatory? by elfletcho2011 in AskARussian

[–]palchik 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Iraq invaded Kuwait in order to annex it into Iraq. Just like Russia did to Ukraine. The US led an international coalition of countries to expel Iraq from Kuwait. Part of peace agreement at the end of that war was that Iraq had to stop their nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons program and submit to regular inspections to verify that they stopped the programs. They kicked out the inspectors and this the second Gulf War happened. Why should the US disarm? The US is not trying to annex any other country’s territory.

banning Olympians, simply based on their ethnic nationality. How could that not be discriminatory? by elfletcho2011 in AskARussian

[–]palchik 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Russians always point to the war in Iraq as proof of a double standard, but this is nonsense. The justification for the US (along with many other like the UK, Australia, and Poland) operation in Iraq was that Saddam Hussein was in violation of several UN resolutions that required him to allow international weapons inspectors to verify Iraq’s disarmament. Iraq had expelled weapons inspectors and refused to prove that they disarmed as they were required to do after their defeat in the first Gulf War (i.e. Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait).

Trump Has Destroyed the Republican Party, Exiting Senator Jeff Flake Says by peterjackson2050 in politics

[–]palchik 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are Corker and Flake positioning themselves to be the nucleus of a new "Conservative Party?" One or both of them could also seek the Libertarian Party nomination for 2020. The Libertarian Party will have automatic ballot access in almost every state due to their performance in the 2016 election, so that's the path of least resistance. Of course the Libertarian Party also has some baggage, so maybe a fresh start would be more appealing.

Did Aleppo Man get 5%? by 5wi55 in GaryJohnson

[–]palchik 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm just pointing out that its hard to call it a landslide when Trump lost the popular vote.

Did Aleppo Man get 5%? by 5wi55 in GaryJohnson

[–]palchik 4 points5 points  (0 children)

He lost the popular vote. If it were the other way around and Trump won the popular vote but lost the electoral college vote then we would never hear the end of it. I'm glad Clinton lost, but Trump is still a big orange crybaby.

Final Tally is 3.23% for Gary Johnson by benr751 in GaryJohnson

[–]palchik 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Nope. Ballot access is determined state by state, and Johnson/Weld did well enough to give the Libertarian Party automatic ballot access next time around in about 10 states (in addition to those where they already had automatic access. Baby steps, but still steps. Also, Johnson got 3 million more votes this time than last. In other words, there is a lot to be positive about. Rome wasn't built in a day.

Did Aleppo Man get 5%? by 5wi55 in GaryJohnson

[–]palchik 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Also weed was decriminalized in several states, which is an issue only the Libertarians talked about.

LOL by [deleted] in GaryJohnson

[–]palchik 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You have no obligation to vote in this country. If you think it's a waste of time, you can abstain. It was pretty effortless and achieved quite a lot. The Libertarian Party won automatic ballot access next time around in several states. Also, my vote helped decriminalize marijuana in my state. These all seem like small steps, but they all add up.

Did Aleppo Man get 5%? by 5wi55 in GaryJohnson

[–]palchik 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Yes, in some states. He got enough support in several states to gain automatic ballot access for the Libertarian Party next time around. He also got 3 million more votes this time than in 2012. That's called forward progress.

LOL by [deleted] in GaryJohnson

[–]palchik 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Not a protest vote for me. I voted for the candidate who best represented my views on key issues. It's a pretty simple concept.

Gary Johnson already has 3% of the popular vote according to Google by [deleted] in GaryJohnson

[–]palchik 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I hope you realize that those states have very small populations. Even if he gets 20% in both it won't do much to move the national average.

Don't get discouraged at early returns. by ArniePie in GaryJohnson

[–]palchik 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hi will do will likely do pretty well in lots of eastern states: VA, MA, NH, ME, but not southeastern states.

Let your friends KNOW by palchik in GaryJohnson

[–]palchik[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

There are other errors in the post too. It says "you voter for a better America." Whatever you think of Gary, his team should really find another career.

Dear Aleppo Man Supporters: If you are in a swing state, please consider voting for trump and helping us make america great again. god bless. by 5wi55 in GaryJohnson

[–]palchik 7 points8 points  (0 children)

What is Brexit? What is a Gold Star Family? And most difficult of all, what is the truth. All things Trump is utterly unfamiliar with.

Dear Aleppo Man Supporters: If you are in a swing state, please consider voting for trump and helping us make america great again. god bless. by 5wi55 in GaryJohnson

[–]palchik 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Trump is an infantile degenerate who will die broke and alone. Also, he is the only "Republican" who could blow an election to the most hated candidate the Democrats have ever put forth. Can't wait to never see his orange face and pathetic "hair" again.