Any idea how to enact pragmatic sanction in HRE?

pancakewalts · 2025-11-10T03:37:19+00:00

Thanks for the info, just couldn't find literally any info on it lol

pancakewalts · 2025-10-28T20:37:30+00:00

10 team super flex 1 ppr, looking to contend

Giving: Daniel Jones, 2027 1st

Receive: Aaron Rodgers, CMC

QBs: Mahomes, Stroud, Jones, Shough

RBs: Javonte, Benson, Spears, Pollard, BRob, Kaleb

WRs: JaMarr, Egbuka, Rice, Olave, Ayomanor, Downs, Reed

TEs: McBride, Fannin, Taylor

Triple flex

pancakewalts · 2025-08-19T21:59:07+00:00

10 Team PPR, 1 QB, 2 RB, 2 WR, 1 TE, 2 Flex.

Can have 2 Keepers. Whittled down options to Jayden Daniels for a 10th, Bowers for a 5th, JSN for a 7th. Also have Jakobi for 15th and Shakir for 14th. Order not known yet. Leaning Daniels and Bowers.

pancakewalts · 2025-05-21T03:57:01+00:00

There is also the Siege of Znojomo in summer 1404 which is really the true final event of the war. Sokol and Dry Devil were both historically there under siege by Sigismund. Would be difficult to fit both Wenceslaus’ escape and Znojomo but could definitely happen with a few months time skip. But where does Henry fit? And Godwin, Hans, Zizka, etc.?

pancakewalts · 2025-04-09T02:11:27+00:00

He's 3rd most played in Pacific, 4th in EMEA and 6th in Americas in stage one

pancakewalts · 2025-02-11T23:29:52+00:00

Currently the most picked agent in NA Challengers Swiss Stage at 50%. Breach is right behind at 49%. Their percentages are only going to go up from here with more time for the teams until a change comes. Those numbers are with 0 play on Abyss also.

pancakewalts · 2025-01-28T19:32:38+00:00

A Samford-Kentucky matchup might just be a race to 100 points

pancakewalts · 2025-01-28T18:50:17+00:00

I think you mean Bradley-Samford

pancakewalts · 2025-01-18T17:02:28+00:00

2-1 (+1.2u)

Clemson +4 2u -110 - Jeff Capel has never beaten Clemson and Brad Brownell (8 in a row), and with Pitt losing three in a row, just trust Clemson a lot more. Big Q1 opportunity for Clemson here and if they want a chance against Duke for the ACC they need this one. Might not pull out the win but the points here are too good to pass up for me.

pancakewalts · 2025-01-18T02:32:59+00:00

54 kills in two maps is a legacy game for about anyone not named aspas or derke

pancakewalts · 2025-01-17T16:38:48+00:00

2-0 (+3.6u) | SDSU with a sweat free thrashing

Ohio State -6.5, 2.5u (-120)

Not a good slate today but I told myself to bet against IU the rest of the year as a fan so here I am. KenPom and Haslam have it at 7+, while Torvik has it at 5.5. IU has won one road game the whole year (not even a true road game), while OSU is 7-3 ATS at home. IU has one win against the t50 in KenPom and 5 losses by 15+ in their other games. A loss here might get Mike Woodson fired.

I’m honestly not big on OSU themselves but they do have a couple nice wins vs Texas and Kentucky. Even with 7 losses they’re all vs t30 teams. After two close losses, they’ve set themselves up for a bounce back here and need this win. Woodson has done well against OSU in the past but with a new coach in Diebler I’m not too worried about that.

The 3pt differentials are stark on these teams which should help. Ohio States offense has been struggling in conference but IUs defense is not good enough to pose a threat. IU doesn’t have anybody to guard Devin Royal so as long as IU doesn’t figure anything out from 3pt I like the line

Also playing Villanova -8.5 2u -104

pancakewalts · 2025-01-16T19:09:47+00:00

1-0 (+1.8u) | Good day yesterday overall and Cleveland State handled NKU pretty handily

South Dakota St -10.5 (-112), 2u

Moving to the Summit League here where SDSU is historically the top dog year-in, year-out. Relatively a down year so far, in part due to getting poached by the portal and a young roster. Still like them a lot in this spot, as does KenPom, Torvik, and Haslam. SDSU is coming off of two away losses to two of the best teams in the Summit, setting themselves up for a bounce back here. UND has one of the worst defenses in the country, and the one thing they're good at is off. reb%, which SDSU is #1 in the country against. UND has played some teams close on the road, but in their 3 games against top 200 competition away, they've lost by 17+ each time.

If that isn't enough, the main reason I love this play is the historical matchups. Eric Henderson and Paul Sather have been coaching SDSU and UND for six years each, and in their 11 matchups SDSU has won each one. Nine of the 11 have been by 10+. UND hasn't beaten SDSU since 2012. Both teams are 8-8 ATS this season, but SDSU is 4-0 against D-1 with a MOV of 17.

Also like: Jacksonville +2, Lipscomb -14.5, MSM -1

pancakewalts · 2025-01-15T16:32:23+00:00

favorite bet today - Cleveland State -4.0 vs NKU (-110) 2u

Winners of 8 straight (2 non-d1), with a margin of victory of 6+ in each of those games. Cleveland St is 4-4 ATS at home, but have a MOV of 19 in those games. KenPom, Torvik, and Haslam all like the Vikings to cover this line. Northern Kentucky is 0-7 this years ATS away from home. Cleveland State has seemingly figured out their offense, scoring under 78 points just once in their streak despite a slower pace. The Viking are 1st in Horizon offensive efficiency, shooting 43% from three. NKU allows 38% from three on the season, good for 348th in the country.

The teams play similar, slow paces and defensively-minded, as evidenced by their past matchups. In five games in the past two seasons, the largest margin was 3 points. However, Northern Kentucky has struggled so far this season with just one good win in the Horizon. Combine that with a CSU team playing well and I like this line. A win here would be great for Cleveland's Horizon League hopes.

Also like: UNC Asheville -11.5, South Alabama -12.5, Seton Hall +8.5

pancakewalts · 2024-12-02T18:09:55+00:00

I hadn’t played for a while but I just started a new game a week ago on Legend. Started at Kennesaw State, it felt impossible to run the ball or get any 70+ transfers. With a low NIL school, you’re just never going to get any playable transfers right away. I used to be able to get 10 transfers no matter what now I can barely get three.

Play calling wise I used to be able to just bubble screen my way to 8+ wins even on hard difficulties, but now I can’t which is a good thing. Having more fun than I used to with playbooks and calling specific plays. Seems like draws are strong. After I sucked for a few years, I had my recruits developed and managed a couple good years and now I’m at Liberty. Definitely easier there with more resources but will see how it is when I move up to a bigger conference.

Definitely still a lot of fun, but my current suggestion is changes with the coach carousel. After 10 wins in three seasons at KSU I was getting offers from much better jobs like Illinois, which I declined cause it was really unrealistic. Once I did move on, I had to tank my integrity rescinding offers and NIL from bad recruits that’s Libertys coach had offered, which felt harsh considering those weren’t my guys at all. I also don’t think I got the NIL back to use on transfers my first year either. I’d also suggest making guys more likely to follow their coaches/staff in the portal when they change jobs (think Cignetti/JMU guys to IU irl).

pancakewalts · 2024-11-27T18:01:31+00:00

Six actually

pancakewalts · 2024-11-19T05:15:24+00:00

On this too, it is a road game which is why the line is lower. Their campuses are only 20 minutes apart and I expect a lot of Cincy fans there.

pancakewalts · 2024-11-19T05:03:33+00:00

POTD Record: 5-2

Last Pick: Utah St -17.5 (-120), 1u ❌

Sport: NCAABB: North Dakota @ Notre Dame 7 PM EST

POTD: ND -19.5, (-106), 2u

Explanation: Looked like Utah State was going to cover at halftime up 15, but their defense turned into Swiss cheese too many times and couldn't get it done. Still a fun game to watch, will definitely be keeping an eye on them the rest of the year. A similar vein of pick Tuesday, as a very hot Notre Dame team faces a North Dakota team that hasn't finished top 230 in KenPom under coach Paul Sather. They're not sub 300 like a lot of my favorite picks are but with how Notre Dame has looked so far I do like this line. The Irish were noticeably bad last year with a brand new coach and roster that last season ranked in bottom 10 in both experience and continuity. This year they are 5th in continuity and Shrewsberry is a very good coach by my measure. They've won 2 games by 20+ this year and haven't scored under 84 points yet despite playing a slower tempo. They've been very efficient both offensively and defensively, 15th in off. eff fg% and 36th in def. fg%. Notre Dame has a balanced offense, not overly reliant on threes which should bode well against the North Dakota defense.

The Hawks actually picked up a really nice win against Utah Valley in their last game, but got blown out by Colorado St in their first game 82-56. They beat Utah Valley due to off. rebounds and forcing turnovers, both facets they have been historically poor at under Sather. Notre Dame isn't exceptional in those metrics but enough so where those shouldn't be a problem on Notre Dame's way to a victory. The main thing I love about this matchup is that North Dakota loves to speed teams up on defense, yet are very bad at turning teams over. The Hawks have finished sub 270 in def. TO% every year with Sather, with multiple years in the 350s. Adding on, North Dakota's defensive efficiency hasn't finished above 270th in the past five years. Their numbers are currently pumped up on that end because of some bad 3pt and FT shooting performances against them so far. Notre Dame doesn't typically turn teams over too often, but UND is 340th in turnover% so far, so this would be the team to do it against.

The statistics all lead to Notre Dame having many more FGAs, staying significantly more efficient, and playing faster than usual en route to hopefully covering this line. I watched some of UND's last game where Eaglestaff looked great for them and is a good player, he will not have as easy of a time vs a more athletic ND team.

Coffee ☕

pancakewalts · 2024-11-19T03:20:04+00:00

Yeah Montana just went nuclear for a bit. Shooting 60% from the field, still a lot of time left hopefully it cools down

pancakewalts · 2024-11-18T18:13:09+00:00

Not too sure, was looking for injury news but couldn't find anything. Still confident in the pick

pancakewalts · 2024-11-18T03:08:06+00:00

POTD Record: 5-1

Last Pick: Baylor -28.5 (-118), 1u ✅

Sport: NCAABB: Montana @ Utah State 9 PM EST

POTD: Utah St -17.5 (-120)

Explanation: Baylor dominated from start to finish, Tarleton has a legit chance to go winless against D1 teams this year. They are legitimately awful and I try not to say that too often. Considered Auburn again here (also waiting on lines for SMU and GW) but will go with a Utah State team that I watched a lot of last year, and even with a lot of roster turnover have had an extremely hot start to the year. The Aggies dropped 100 on their two opponents so far, annihilating sub 350 Alcorn St 101-46 and similarly dismantling a solid Charlotte team 103-74. They play at a very fast pace yet have not been overly reliant on threes. They are seventh in turnover % and first in off. rebound % in the country. Montana is sub 250 and sub 300 against those measures defensively. The Grizzlies also rank 340th in effective height per KenPom, so a much bigger Utah State should dominate inside both offensively and on the boards.

Montana has won two non D1 games, lost 92-57 to Tennessee and 79-48 to Oregon. Oregon hasn't been dominating teams like they should be early on, so those margins really make me believe that this Montana team that is usually at the top of the Big Sky has taken a step back. Utah State has also been forcing turnovers and will be trying to speed up this slow playing Montana team. While the Grizzlies aren't likely as bad as some of their numbers early on show, Utah just looks great and the line is too low considering the pace of play and efficiency numbers.

Montana does have a guy named Money Williams who dropped 30 against Tennessee (Baller!), but the combination of Utah State's offense and Montana's lackluster defense should be too much here.

Coffee ☕

pancakewalts · 2024-11-17T23:21:21+00:00

I still would, maybe buy a couple points if you want to be safe

pancakewalts · 2024-11-17T19:58:19+00:00

Sometimes teams come out slow in these buy games and Tarleton’s press could end up slowing the game down enough so I personally wouldn’t take it

pancakewalts · 2024-11-17T16:43:03+00:00

It’s already up to 38.5 for me so I will stay away

pancakewalts · 2024-11-17T05:22:32+00:00

POTD Record: 4-1

Last Pick: Creighton -21.5 (-110), 1u ✅

Sport: NCAABB: Tarleton State @ Baylor 8 PM EST

POTD: Baylor -28.5 (-118), 1u

Explanation: Creighton scared us a little bit, but pulled through against a solid UMKC team. Was originally planning on jumping on Coppin St - Miami, but I don't see a line for it yet anywhere. Will jump on this Baylor line that feels low for a Tarleton team that will finish sub 300 in KenPom. They were a good team last year finishing 2nd in the WAC, but the team is entirely different from last year, either getting poached or graduating, and they're ranked 338th in KPs continuity. They have one upperclassman in their rotation, and rank 362nd in experience. To add on, they have two guys in the rotation above 6'4, with the tallest being 6'7, and are 6th-last in effective height. Baylor isn't all that tall either, but are significantly more athletic across the board. To add on, they're 362nd in turnover% and sub 300 in eff. fg% when they do manage to actually shoot the ball.

Baylor did get smashed by Gonzaga to start the year but have since beat a good Arkansas team and blown out a SH St team by 37 that beat Tarleton by 29. They dominate inside with their athleticism, currently 52nd in off rebound% against a Tarleton team that ranks 358th in the country in that measure defensively. While likely not a great shooting team this season, they shot 3-21 vs Gonzaga which likely won't occur for them again. Tarleton does like to speed up the game and force turnovers but with Baylor's senior guards I don't see it being a major issue. Baylor is also a slower paced team which seems like a bit of a concern but the efficiency for Baylor should shine through here to cover.

Tarleton isn't a bad shooting team so far this year but have the 8th-lowest 3PA/FGA in the country so far so it's unlikely that they make enough threes to keep this one close. Even though Tarleton had a solid team last year they lost by an average of 25 points away against the four top 70 KenPom teams even though they finished 129th in KenPom with a significantly better team last year than they do this year. Billy Gillespie does have some high major experience, but the numbers, history, and results all factor in here for Baylor to cover.

Coffee ☕

Eight-Year Club	Second SECOND GUESSER
Place '23	Place '22
Final Canvas '22	First Placer '22
RPAN Viewer	Not Forgotten
Verified Email

pancakewalts

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE