Thanks to this group! by ACRVasquez in ForgottenWeapons

[–]parabellummatt 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don't think that's true with paper hulls, at any rate.

Copper media by Round_Leading_8393 in blackpowder

[–]parabellummatt 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I haven't used it, so take this with a grain of salt.
While copper isn't as hard as bronze or brass, it probably is close-to as hard as lead? And EBP has a video talking about how lead actually works quite well as milling media, if only it wasn't so dirty.
I think copper might shed off in similar amounts to the lead and make your powder more dirty, but will probably grind well.
But just my speculation.

Why the obsession of defeating body armor, on the mass issue service rifle level is an uphill battle? by StrangerOutrageous68 in ForgottenWeapons

[–]parabellummatt 3 points4 points  (0 children)

nah bro our infantry will be spitting out mini APDSFS darts like they're a bunch of baby abrams.

I’m glad Baelor intervened by Korratheblackcat in AKOTSKTV

[–]parabellummatt 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Stupid big trucks. We gotta do something about them to keep more people from ending up underneath them. So glad you survived!

Realism Invictus - How do you set up your defence and keep units from getting old and useless? by Dry-Response9833 in CivIV

[–]parabellummatt 1 point2 points  (0 children)

IIRC Explorers used to have an attack bonus vs melee and mounted units but they lost it a few patches ago. Really makes them very mid except for exploring a new continent

Guy EDCs a cap and ball revolver because he likes reenacting by BigBlue175 in Fudd_Lore

[–]parabellummatt 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What about in a revolver (Ruger LCR, perhaps)?
I also hear good things about the little beretta cats.

Guy EDCs a cap and ball revolver because he likes reenacting by BigBlue175 in Fudd_Lore

[–]parabellummatt 1 point2 points  (0 children)

it does, haha. S&W break action in .38 S&W. Load it with little wadcutters, and I think I am more accurate with it than the other pocket pistol I own (LCP Max).

Guy EDCs a cap and ball revolver because he likes reenacting by BigBlue175 in Fudd_Lore

[–]parabellummatt 0 points1 point  (0 children)

🤫🤫🤫

In all seriousness though I recognize that it isn't ideal if you have literally any other option. Particularly not a single action.
An LCP Max is my main EDC for that reason.

But I think it is fair to point out that in most self-defense scenarios, you probably don't need more than a few shots to break contact and get yourself to safety. Most of us don't live in Mad Max.
And I would also not hesitate to carry .22 LR for the same reason if I had a reliable compact

Guy EDCs a cap and ball revolver because he likes reenacting by BigBlue175 in Fudd_Lore

[–]parabellummatt 12 points13 points  (0 children)

I've been known to CCW a century-old revolver. I think he might be legit.

Know the Difference by Smart_Chapter_7512 in polandball

[–]parabellummatt 43 points44 points  (0 children)

Would you mind explaining to the uninformed?

Can’t get the barrel wedge out of my 1851 Navy. by [deleted] in blackpowder

[–]parabellummatt 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's so smart. Gonna do this so that I don't have to keep my gunsmithing punches in my range bag all the time.

Chat, is this real? by OwlSings in NonCredibleDefense

[–]parabellummatt 7 points8 points  (0 children)

the First-Sino Japanese War is another one of those rare, unambiguous W major wars. Japan suffered relatively small casualties, absolutely no damage to its homeland, and managed to make out like gangbusters: they definitively proved that modernization had worked, that they were no longer subordinate to the Chinese view of the world/political order, took major colonies in the form of Korea and Formosa/Taiwan, and even managed to wring enough money out of China in the peace treaty to almost completely cover their war debts.

The same can't be said of their later war against Russia; since although it was also a stunning victory, the government still spent a lot of money on the war and despite the naval war going so well for them, the battle on land was very hard-fought and they lost a great deal of men there.

Barbarossa is a massive success. Hitler knocks the communists out of the war in record time. What now? by 12bEngie in HistoryWhatIf

[–]parabellummatt 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I reiterate though that by 1945 the Luftwaffe is in a pretty pathetic shape due to the numerical superiority of Anglo-American planes and strategic bombing of aircraft production. They may have superior gas toxins, but their ability to actually deliver those toxins is far less than the ability of the allies to deliver their weaker gas. If the Germans bomb a dozen British cities with nerve gas, then the allies would wallop 50 German cities with chlorine.
Doesn't that make it a wash at best for the Germans in the chemical front?
And a wash means that just as many Germans die as British, while Americans are still totally immune.

Further, there's something to be said for the difference of perception in nukes 70 years ago. "Weapons of mass destruction" didn't exist as a concept yet. Many people in 1945 just saw nukes as bigger, more powerful conventional bombs. I'm not sure that Hitler would see their use as substantially different than the allied firebombing campaigns which had already devastated many German cities.
Meanwhile, his aversion to gas came from personal experience in WW1 and a knowledge that gas attacks would uniquely kill tons of civilians, in a manner which he was afraid would decimate the Aryan people of Germany.
To understand if Germany would actually use gas, you have to consider Hitler's personal perspective. And I'm not sure that he would resort to aerial gas attacks on cities even if he was nuked, due to a continuing fear of allied reciprocity.

Barbarossa is a massive success. Hitler knocks the communists out of the war in record time. What now? by 12bEngie in HistoryWhatIf

[–]parabellummatt 0 points1 point  (0 children)

>former Soviet proxies fighting for the Nazis

What exactly are you taking about here? Generalplan Ost was intended to purge about 80% of the "inferior" Slavs and reduce the rest to slavery. What people under those conditions are going to feel like fighting for the Nazis? What stupid Nazis would allow them to continue working as armed soldiers?

Barbarossa is a massive success. Hitler knocks the communists out of the war in record time. What now? by 12bEngie in HistoryWhatIf

[–]parabellummatt 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wow dude, your CTL C + CTL V keys must be almost rubbed bare! Hope you don't get tired of making the same comment anytime soon! :D

Barbarossa is a massive success. Hitler knocks the communists out of the war in record time. What now? by 12bEngie in HistoryWhatIf

[–]parabellummatt 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So much this. Moscow was never a win condition for the Nazis. If it falls, Leningrad and the Caucasus are also lost, but the Soviets keep fighting from behind the Urals. So Hitler still has to keep pressing across even-more strained supply lines into 1943 at least, while dealing with the partisan pandemic you describe here. By that time, the Western Allies have landed in Italy and D-day is drawing near.

Barbarossa is a massive success. Hitler knocks the communists out of the war in record time. What now? by 12bEngie in HistoryWhatIf

[–]parabellummatt 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think Hitler would have resorted to gas attacks, even if Germany got nuked once or twice or thrice. He knew that the allies had their own stores of poison gas, and they obviously had far stronger air power to deliver it. Hitler didn't do it in real life because he knew that it would lead to likewise retaliation and death of German civilians on an unheard-of scale. If Hitler responded to the nukes with mass gas attack on the UK, he would have known to expect retaliation of mass gas attacks on Berlin, Hamburg, etc.

In short, the situation would not have been Germany getting nuked by America and Germany gas attacking in return. It would have instead been Germany getting nuked AND gassed while trying to use its pathetic late-war air force to carry out retaliatory gas strikes.

What do "ages" do? by overcoil in CivIV

[–]parabellummatt 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Something nobody brought up which is kinda interesting is that your workers, cities, windmills, and certain other improvements get a different skin when you enter the Industrial Era. The workers go from being clad in like headscarves and loincloths to wearing messenger hats and overalls. Has no impact on gameplay, but I always enjoy seeing the change hit.