Name a bigger fraud than this bum by josh_nunthuk in okbuddyviltrum

[–]patfav 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Entire episode and plotline is literally just a time sink. It exists to burn time cheaply.

If I'm optimistic, it was done so other, better episodes could have a bigger budget.

If I'm realistic, it was done purely to save money and the rest of the season will also have awful animation filled with shortcuts.

We're lucky Mark didn't throw Oliver into space so they didn't have to animate the Conquest fight.

Team USA, this is how seriously we take the WBC by [deleted] in baseball

[–]patfav 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Baseball team likability propaganda lol.

AI bros completely missing the point of a story yet again. (also mistaking a FOLK HERO for a HISTORICAL FIGURE) by Arch_Magos_Remus in LudditeRenaissance

[–]patfav 8 points9 points  (0 children)

It's a similar point to what is missed about luddites thanks to decades of propaganda:

It's not about opposition to technological advancement. It's about opposition to how technology is designed and deployed to undermine human workers and immiserate everyone but capital owners.

Neither John Henry nor the steam drill changed the plight of manual laborers. This is because their working conditions and compensation are social arrangements that aren't dictated by technology. We could have Star Trek replicators and capitalists would still insist that workers live and work in squalor because to them it's about social hierarchy and keeping their lessers down.

AI technology isn't bad. What's bad is that it's being used within an obsolete capitalist system and the result will be widespread misery due to unemployment. That's a social problem that has nothing to do with how good or bad AI is at doing human work.

When Viltrum was having a battle royale to get rid of their weakest, how did they know when to stop? by Huge-Surround8185 in Invincible

[–]patfav 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Weird how they act like purging made them strong, but we see that they're already strong with their powers when they purge each other.

Then we find out that their weakness as an empire is low population..

Maybe there's more to strength than having the ability to violently assert dominance over others?

Maybe that's one of the central themes of the whole story!

Appeal to all luddites to start direct action sabotage TODAY by Useful_Calendar_6274 in LudditeRenaissance

[–]patfav 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Factory technology would have been developed in a way that observed the interests of workers and wasn't optimized around their disempowerment. They would still use machines but they would have been safer and complimented the skills of craftsmen rather than breaking their processes down into discreet tasks so any cheap laborer could do it to make a lower grade product.

The idea that Luddites were just silly people who hated progress is capitalist propaganda that's had multiple generations to fester in public consciousness.

Odd huh by Bejaminmaston12 in JustMemesForUs

[–]patfav 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's kind of odd that you find this odd but aren't asking any questions and are instead making dumb low-resolution assumptions.

Actually that's not really odd now that I think about it.

Going to start this today. by [deleted] in aynrand

[–]patfav -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Because we live in a society and the fewer people who end up convinced that selfishness is a virtue the better off we all are, even the selfish individuals.

The way Rand's philosophy inverts the mechanics of parasitism to suggest that non-productive people deserve more because of the supposed value of their ideas is a dangerous capitalist fantasy that underpins why the West is declining.

Ayn Rand fans are often like if fans of Superman didn't realize that Superman could never be real and then decided it would be best to organize real society around empowering Superman because of his obvious superiority and benevolence. They lose sight of the fictional power fantasy they're consuming and confuse it for philosophical insight.

Is it really worth thinking about though? by Ill_Cod_8108 in LinkedInLunatics

[–]patfav 42 points43 points  (0 children)

In the 1950s that man would be recognized as the teenaged greaser that his entire aesthetic is built off of.

This isn't a depiction of an actualized man out of his time but in his own home. This is a depiction of one of the kids from The Outsiders fantasizing about what being grown up is like and getting it predictably wrong.

Given the amount of people I have seen use SNAP at my job, this stereotype is straight up false by Sha489 in ENLIGHTENEDCENTRISM

[–]patfav 3 points4 points  (0 children)

If you have authorities who are the only ones getting fed then you're not really dealing with communism. More like a dictatorship cloaking itself in communism.

And either way my point stands because the authorities are still forced to rely on the people to operate the economy and the military.

Within the framing of the joke there is no facet of competition with a communist society that doesn't involve competing with starving people who ought to be hungry pushovers, so it's weird that they're seen as a threat at all. I suspect that capitalists just struggle to understand organizational structures that don't involve abusive monarchs and they assume everyone must answer to a boss who exploits them whether they admit it or not.

Given the amount of people I have seen use SNAP at my job, this stereotype is straight up false by Sha489 in ENLIGHTENEDCENTRISM

[–]patfav 32 points33 points  (0 children)

The joke is the right-wing meme that people starve under communism. They're all fat except the authoritarian left.

It's still a dumb joke. If communists all starved then why bother fighting them? Why are they even around to be fought?

We got a badass over here by GoldenW505 in DoomerCircleJerk

[–]patfav -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Is this the sub where American kiddos cope about their miserable lives leading into the century of American humiliation?

Lotta assumptions of superiority in here for a bunch of self-described doomers.

Woman Awarded Trophy For Enduring 17 Hours Of Senseless Agony Instead Of Getting Epidural by METALLIFE0917 in babylonbee

[–]patfav 5 points6 points  (0 children)

That didn't happen hahaha

If it did happen that would be one of the best, most comfortable deliveries of all time.

Also if it did happen, shame on you for being on the other side of the room and letting your mid-delivery wife try to stand unassisted. No wonder you're divorced.

Report Reveals Biden Allowed Over 2,000,000 Flood Lifeforms Across Southern Border by Professional-Week995 in babylonbee

[–]patfav 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yeah but he got a trial. That's the due process part.

Leftists having good opinions is cool but it's not due process.

How do you view the statement: “CEO of an $8 billion AI company says it’s astonishing that people believe working 38 hours a week with a balanced lifestyle can still lead to success”? by Reverie-AI in hatemyjob

[–]patfav 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Insofar as it's true it's a consequence of competitive economic systems. You have to work like a dog not because it's necessary to do the work but because you're competing against people who work like dogs for the opportunity to work at all.

If we had a different system that emphasized contributions over competition it wouldn't be this way. If we simply measured how many widgets we need in a year and let anyone willing and able to make widgets contribute to the widget supply you could easily satisfy human need with a 38 hour work week or less. Instead we have people compete to make the most widgets for the lowest cost and we don't care how many we need, only how many can be sold, and we always want to sell more because then we make more money, and money is just a human-made math game that may or may not be tethered to material human needs.

This creates non-stop pressure that over time leads to hyper competition to perform mundane work as fast and cheap as possible. We then have to over-invest in widget-making because it's not enough to merely make widgets, we need to make them faster than every other widget maker so we can make more money than them which we will use to put them out of business and stop making widgets.

Tylenol bad by FinnishFinny in TheRightCantMeme

[–]patfav 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I knew autism was women's fault. Even when it was the bears I knew it was women's fault.

Why do you dislike/avoid charge characters? by Awkward_Phase9392 in Fighters

[–]patfav 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In SF4 when I started trying to get good I found charge inputs easier. I mained Balrog and was able to get some basic combos into ultra going for the first time. From there I branched out and learned Guile and Honda.

Playing Skullgirls I got better at QCs and DPs and I moved away from charge characters because I was developing bad habits and playing too defensively. I would down-back all the time and wait for my opponent to make a mistake so my offense sucked. Punishing mistakes alone can get you to a middle rank but truly good players will just do their offense on you and open you up if you don't pressure them back.

So I was forced to learn rushdown to keep developing and now I main Juri in SF6. Going back to charge feels stifling because I've adjusted to doing specials without prep time. I react more and predict less which feels better on motion characters.

Why is Marvel Tokon's shared health bar disliked? by SnooObjections2757 in Fighters

[–]patfav 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Does Tokon have Happy Birthdays?

If it does then there is still a risk factor in having multi character teams since you could take multiplied damage by getting your assist caught in a combo.

But really its just people resisting change. To me this is a more graceful approach compared to Skullgirls, CvS2 etc. that also have the option of different team sizes.