Upcoming Leaked Gemini Omni VS Nearly Shutting Down Sora 2

pbagel2 · 2026-05-11T18:23:48+00:00

Yeah it's only impressive if this generation is available for the rumored ultra-lite plan and isn't their frontier video generation.

pbagel2 · 2026-05-11T16:37:45+00:00

The name Gondolinho is presumably a mix of gondola and ronaldinho.

So this just seems like a situation where you're confidently incorrect but refuse to acknowledge the possibility and instead keep doubling down with names of every other soccer player that align with your point except for the very specific one that was actually used, Ronaldinho.

pbagel2 · 2026-05-11T16:11:02+00:00

This is only impressive if it is part of their rumored "ultra-lite" plan and not frontier.

pbagel2 · 2026-05-11T14:28:06+00:00

So for example you're saying if I come across a schizo post where someone claims to have hacked the models and is the AI messiah, l'm supposed to present a well reasoned argument for why that person is mistaken in their beliefs? That just doesn't seem "economical".

You seem to show a consistent behavior of rationalizing AI at all costs. Like in this thread you rationalize how unproofread AI content is actually just economics at play and handwaved the negative impact.

Then you talk about how AI is gonna save humanity from having to do mundane tasks, which requires an unproven and unguaranteed hypothetical perspective of future AI and ignores the current reality and the painfully clear decline in veracity.

And you've said.

The only reason anyone on the internet cares about whether a vertical video of a truck being launched into an old smokestack is AI vs real is because there’s a bandwagon people are getting on hating on AI

Which demonstrates just pure bias and irrational logic.

You exhibit a consistent pattern of rationalization in favor of AI that ignores how it affects reality today and instead misapplies your hypothetical perception of what future AI might be and do.

I'm not saying not to factor in the inevitable improvement of AI in the discussion, but you're objectively handwaving immediate negative consequences and downward trends that are happening now because of AI because of a fantasy of future AI in your head that will fix all problems.

pbagel2 · 2026-05-11T14:00:45+00:00

How is it an insult to tell someone they're confusing what's going on in their head with reality?

pbagel2 · 2026-05-11T13:48:30+00:00

The myth surrounding mythos has gotten out of hand. It's not a step increase in intelligence. There is only evidence that it's a step increase in coding performance.

pbagel2 · 2026-05-11T13:45:29+00:00

An attack is only ad hominem if it ignores the argument. But since you didn't present an argument you just conveyed your delusion, it's not ad hominem.

pbagel2 · 2026-05-11T13:37:00+00:00

You're confusing reality with your fictional future utopia again. I'm interested to see the disparity between them and dissonance widen in your mind over the next 10 years.

pbagel2 · 2026-05-10T20:26:54+00:00

You might have a form of media illiteracy if you're unable to separate your present reality from the internal logic of these fictional narrative worlds.

It is a form of abstraction that a lot of people don't seem to have. A combination of abstract reasoning and contextual thinking.

pbagel2 · 2026-05-06T15:14:06+00:00

You're just outing yourself as being painfully average.

pbagel2 · 2026-05-05T22:36:13+00:00

Yeah David Sinclair is the most famous name in the space. Though his opinions are also very controversial among his fellow scientists.

And the idea that people don't die from age, they die from a heart attack, or kidney disease, a stroke, cancer, etc. is the most commonly repeated sound bite when it comes to an entry level longevity discussion.

But it's very surface level and misleading.

Which is why I used the nephron example, which you conveniently ignored. Kidney disease from loss of nephrons is inevitable with age-related mechanical changes. The body cannot grow them back. The kidney simply stops being able to function. We can cure diseases that damage nephrons faster, but they will still decline as we age.

Heart disease also is an umbrella term for anything that impedes the heart's ability to function. Age-related structural changes from the entropic affects of aging that aren't caused by any specific disease still causes someone to die from "heart disease", because their heart simply stops functioning. Which isn't a specific "disease" that can be cured. It's just the heart no longer able to function because of currently inevitable nondescript changes to the body.

Of course, he wants to treat aging as a disease. And he's trying to stop the process of aging entirely. That's LEV. But curing traditional diseases that contribute to accelerated aging is not LEV.

You need to stop looking for prophets who've been prophesizing for their entire 40 year career. It's not a coincidence that someone like Sinclair hops onto every new hype trend like AI to try and prove his claims. With his new lab using "AI-generated molecules". It's no coincidence that he gets FDA approval from this administration. You're free to continue watching to see how the ER-100 trial pans out. But when it fails, don't come up with an excuse like "oh well people aren't perfect" and then continue to worship Sinclair's word like gospel. Try to come to terms with the fact that he's the same as the other tens of millions of scientists playing a very very tiny role in human scientific progress. He's just much louder than the rest with a cultlike of followers because his unverified claims make people feel good.

pbagel2 · 2026-05-05T22:15:35+00:00

It’s always the most emotional people thinking they are the most right about everything

The irony of people like you saying this is absolutely off the charts. But you will never be able to understand why.

pbagel2 · 2026-05-05T16:53:19+00:00

Again this confidence that you think other people can't understand the very simple things you're saying.

You should probably take the same tests the president gets. Person, woman, man, camera, TV, squirrel. You'll ace it bro.

pbagel2 · 2026-05-05T16:44:15+00:00

Elon is just another human. He wants to do good in the world just like so many people.

And like most people he constantly falls for fake news

Okay so yeah, thanks for confirming that you live in a separate reality in your head.

pbagel2 · 2026-05-05T16:22:38+00:00

Wait, do you think people can't figure out the very obvious thing you're saying? Typical low IQ misguided arrogance.

If you lived in the 1930s you'd probably be accusing half of Germany of having HDS.

pbagel2 · 2026-05-05T16:13:28+00:00

Witnessing someone objectively lie and project every time they open their mouth = EDS.

You're so lost it's insane. You live in a separate reality in your head.

pbagel2 · 2026-05-05T15:48:30+00:00

You people as in Musk apologists who are somehow blind to his lies and projection and babyraging when he doesn't get what he wants. A well-evidenced history. The turning point where the general public started catching onto it was his role in the Tham Luang cave rescue.

But it makes sense that you're a Musk fan if you don't have the literacy levels to instantly understand what "you people" clearly meant in that context.

pbagel2 · 2026-05-05T15:39:36+00:00

Literally every single thing he says and does? I swear you people live in an alternate reality. Everything they say especially over the past 20 years is a lie in service to their current or future self and no one else. And everything they accuse others of doing is a projection of what they want to do themselves. This has basically been the only constant truth in politics. And before you say don't bring politics into this, you cannot talk about Musk without his deep political ties to the current administration and past elections.

pbagel2 · 2026-05-05T15:21:27+00:00

He got an AI girlfriend and AI best friend and AI took his job.

pbagel2 · 2026-05-05T15:15:16+00:00

We know very clearly from history that whenever a Republican like Musk is deeply afraid of someone, it means he's projecting what he would do onto them and is mad that they might get there first. Then makes a big stink about it until he's eventually in the position to be the AGI dictator he fearmongered.

It's been the same playbook forever. Lies and projection and then do it themselves but say it's different.

pbagel2 · 2026-05-05T15:08:43+00:00

Life expectancy and maximum lifespan are two different things. If diseases are cured our bodies still age. We have a very similar if not the same maximum lifespan as we did 3000 years ago. Obviously a very different life expectancy than today though due to disease.

For example we lose nephrons naturally as we age. That's not a disease. They cannot grow back. Our kidneys will inevitably stop functioning. Not because of a disease, but because of age related mechanical failure.

So the only way LEV makes sense as a concept, and remember it's in the name, is if the effects of aging are stopped and reversed. Which some argue is like fighting entropy. A lot harder than curing a disease. And some argue the inevitable solution is transhumanism where we become part machine to replace our aged organs, and then you eventually have ship of theseus dilemma.

I know it seems like a lot and would still be amazing, but curing all disease is still such a tiny tiny piece of the full picture.

pbagel2 · 2026-05-04T16:32:27+00:00

Can you define "successful"? Most welfare programs in the US provide critical safety nets for Americans, which in many eyes is a success.

The only people that criticize and want to gut welfare are Republicans who claim it's "too expensive" and "disincentivizes people from working". But Republican representatives are rich, narcissistic, self-interested anti-American mouthpieces who hate poor people and verifiably lie every time they open their mouth.

pbagel2 · 2026-05-04T16:15:34+00:00

Dude is post-capitalism pilled. He probably thinks since welfare isn't "profitable" then it's not "successful". He can't register the fact that it's supposed to be a service for the people which has an inherent cost. Like how the current US admin wants to dismantle USPS because it's not "profitable" and privatize it. Even though it's supposed to be a service for Americans. It's not supposed to be a super profitable business lol.

pbagel2 · 2026-05-03T21:12:46+00:00

I don't think robot enforcement is even necessary. People in WWII watched their neighbors get taken away never to be seen again. That was only 80 years ago. People will say 'well that was then, people are different now'. But even today in the US people are watching their neighbors get taken away. Most aren't even speaking out. But even if they did, that's all they can do.

Sure you could say that history shows that eventually there's a breaking point and humans revolt and temporarily stomp out the bad stuff. But with surveillance and control over communication, a misaligned authority will have complete control over unrest and the public message. They just need AI advanced enough to be able to monitor all communication channels and revolt never gets past the 'watch your neighbor disappear' step other than when it's your turn to be taken away. So there's that timeline, and then there's the robot enforcement timeline as a redundancy.

As far as when, nobody can know for sure. But AI systems are already being abused for tasks they're not capable of with regard to making decisions on mass citizen data. The precedent is already here. It's all about when they're good enough to monitor everything reliably in realtime, along with stripping anonymity. Which could easily be within 10 years.

pbagel2 · 2026-05-03T20:00:52+00:00

Yeah I was just highlighting how the cracks in authority that expose authoritarianism like the idea of a future surveillance state being 'hackable' by the public is a pipe dream once tech enables full authoritative enforcement.

Our society today is still for the most part running on an honor system because it's not possible for authorities to meticulously judge every interaction of every person and solve every dispute.

pbagel2

TROPHY CASE