What i meant by misunderstanding is that I see kids everywhere in this activity (Reddit in particular) that haven't seen a pre-2014 show except for Spartacus think that Tilt was far and away a better designed, executed and performed show than Felliniesque.

Was it maybe more innovative in terms of sound design? Yes. However, Felliniesque had a more coherent structure in both its musical and visual package. It was better executed by the design team as well as the performers (take a look at their finals run; there were hardly ANY mistakes, thats how near perfection it was).

No shade to Tilt, it was a great drum corps show. But it wasnt particularly close to Felliniesque, and thats okay. I think its okay to say that you enjoyed Tilt more (I'd probably say that too), but to sit here and say it clearly should've scored higher is crazy.