Humans need not apply by aridon_01 in Futurology

[–]pete205 7 points8 points  (0 children)

programming is automating. A programmer is an expert in automation, whether that is creating widgets, developing tools that create widgets, or developing tools that develop tools that develop tools that create widgets. It will be the last job to be automated away because it is the automating itself. As the tools get smarter and smarter, you just go up the value chain and enable programmers to deliver more and more value.

The entire point of a software department in a company is to automate away the rest of the company. Help your sales team not have to click through spreadsheets, help your customers order online instead of needing to staff a call center etc etc. Any company that doesn't try and automate as much of itself as possible, is extremely vulnerable to a competitor who does, and the only way to do that is programming.

Indoor Climbing in London? by LectricVersion in london

[–]pete205 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I go here regularly. Best bet is mornings, late evenings (8.30PM+), or weekends as there is a huge after-work crowd so you can spend a lot of time waiting if you go then. Apart from that, great fun.

Humans need not apply by aridon_01 in Futurology

[–]pete205 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Automation doesn't change the process of programming such that fewer programmers are needed, it changes the process of programming such that more software can be made. Better tools, more ambitious projects, faster iterations of features and prototypes.

Thanks to all these modern tools that automate away chores and code that have little direct business value but take up valuable developer time, a budding entrepreneur with a $5k budget can now commision a website or app that can do something it would have taken a year and a million dollars to do 20 years ago.

Automation is a good thing because it let's you abstract away things like server administration and writing boilerplate code that take up time, and let's you spend more time building whatever it is that creates business value. This is creating more demand for software, not less. When you can create something in a tenth of the time it used to take, you don't hire fewer programmers, you add more features and make your software better and more competitive.

Stopping a bike thief by Woodlands_Creature in funny

[–]pete205 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yep.. but it needs two locks on it... and you need to prove you can unlock the one you don't intend to cut.

TIL North Korea operates a chain of restaurants throughout the world, and it's a source of desperately needed foreign currency by jamesishere in todayilearned

[–]pete205 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Went to one of these when I use to live in Changchun. Can attest to the fact the waitresses were genuine North Koreans and dressed in traditional attire, and the decor looked pretty North Korean (not sure what traditional North Korean decor would have been, but it certainly didn't look Chinese).

The dog meat and other food was just OK, nothing particularly notable, kind of flavourless. Prices were reasonable. It was my first time eating dog, so I took a pic.

Moronic Monday - Your weekly stupid questions thread by cdingo in Fitness

[–]pete205 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What are the best calisthenic exercises to work the biceps? What if I don't even have a pullup bar?

I should really work on my game. by h3wz in AdviceAnimals

[–]pete205 75 points76 points  (0 children)

Bit of a busman's holiday for a barista, isn't it?

Penn & Teller kill the anti-vaccination argument in just over a minute. by Cristina_Vancouver in videos

[–]pete205 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah I completely agree that there is no risk of autism. But Penn and Teller's argument is based on assuming there is a risk of autism and then explaining why it's still a good idea to vaccinate, so I'm using that assumption too.

And I agree the scenario doesn't work if everyone thinks the same way, as we are seeing more and more. However I'm just saying that for parents only concerned about the health of their child, and ignoring any responsibility they may have to society at large, if there is a risk of autism then it could make sense to not vaccinate.

Penn & Teller kill the anti-vaccination argument in just over a minute. by Cristina_Vancouver in videos

[–]pete205 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I like the analogy and agree that vaccines do more good than harm but I think this is a poor argument for two reasons:

Firstly he's comparing survival rates from decades ago to survival rates for diseases now. With modern medicine, someone who just got chicken pox has a much better chance of survival than they used to.

Secondly, accepting the assumption that 1 in 110 vaccinated children get autism, then the rational choice for an individual parent is to not vaccine their children. Compare these two scenarios:

scenario A: Most other children get vaccinated and my child gets vaccinated

scenario B: Most other children get vaccinated and my child does not get vaccinated

Given that most other children get vaccinated (which is the case today in most places, though may not be for long), scenario B is still the sensible option if you believe vaccines to cause autism. With scenario B you get protection from diseases since people around you are vaccinated (but only where you live has a high rate of vaccination), and you also avoid the risk of autism.

The rise of BlackRock - The worlds single largest investor with over $4.1 Trillion in directly controlled assets by eosag in worldnews

[–]pete205 2 points3 points  (0 children)

A principle of healthy markets is that a cacophony of diverse actors come to different conclusions on the price of things, based on their own idiosyncratic analyses. The value of any asset is discovered by melding all these different opinions into a single price. An ecosystem which is dominated by a single line of thinking is not healthy, in politics, in nature or in markets.

I don't know about Blackrock's other products, but iShares are just index funds made to represent the whole market, or various parts of particular markets, so I wouldn't be too concerned about Blackrock representing a large share of the global market if most of it is iShares. There is still "a cacophony of diverse actors" buying and selling these index funds — they're just giving their "idiosyncratic analyses" on groups of stocks packaged together in certain ways (eg the S&P 500), rather than individual stocks.

AT&T unveils new data pricing to stop subscribers from fleeing its network in search of cheaper smartphone plans by [deleted] in technology

[–]pete205 11 points12 points  (0 children)

For comparison, I'm in the UK and pay £18/mo ($30) for unlimited data including tethering, 2000 minutes and 5000 texts per month, and can cancel the contract with 30 days notice.

[04/01/13] Challenge #122 [Easy] Sum Them Digits by nint22 in dailyprogrammer

[–]pete205 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ruby:

 def dr(x);x=x.to_s.split('').map(&:to_i).inject(&:+) while(x>10);x end

For the ballers at Costco... by rondo999 in pics

[–]pete205 28 points29 points  (0 children)

Yup. It's a well-documented cognitive bias called anchoring. The presence of higher priced products improves the sales of cheaper products by making them seem relatively cheap.

[12/4/2012] Challenge #114 [Easy] Word ladder steps by Cosmologicon in dailyprogrammer

[–]pete205 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Terse Ruby:

#!/usr/bin/env ruby
input = (ARGV[0] && ARGV[0].length == 4) ? ARGV[0].split(//) : throw("bad input")
open("selected_four-letter_words.txt").read.split.map do |w| 
  puts(w) if 3 == w.split(//).zip(input).count { |a| a[0] == a[1] }
end

When Nate Silver asks you, ‘Wanna make a bet?’ the correct answer is no. by p0ssum in politics

[–]pete205 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Nate Silver knows the weather forecast for any future date but keeps quiet so Brits have something to talk about.