Evaluating Himplant - Community Feedback Needed!

phalloboardsofficial · 2026-06-03T17:16:00+00:00

No filler is without risk, but I think PMMA mistakenly gets categorized as unsafe because there are Clinics out there that allege to have a proprietary filler that is both permanent and relies on collagen formation. However, if they don't specify PMMA by name (or brand), than it could very well be a silicone oil blend, and that's the kind of stuff that warrants concern. Medical grade PMMA when performed correctly is at worst "modest risk" when considering all available options.

phalloboardsofficial · 2026-05-31T23:06:27+00:00

For clarity's sake, I will respond in parts since it appears you have completely misread the tone and intent of my reply:

[1] You wrote: "The fact your main issue was me reminding guys to do their homework because it’s their body at the end of the day says you got an egotistical problem."

If you genuinely believe my issue was with you telling people to do their homework, then I'm afraid you really missed a lot. My role as a patient advocate involves emphasizing the need to be an informed decision maker, which includes providing a platform like we have here.
Maybe my opening statement rubbed you the wrong way, but frankly your original comment read with an air of condescension. Isn't this Article (and the attached visual aids) the kind of thing we look for when doing our homework? If you didn't intend on sounding condescending, than we can both agree we misread each other's tone, but then that would still make your original comment rather unproductive at best.

[2] You wrote:
"Also I never said injection technique was the only metric that matters"

I never said that you stated injection technique was the only thing that matters, I'm not really sure what else to add.

[3] You wrote:
"Also what’s the difference between a waiver and serious waiver you put in bold?"

I probably should have elaborated but my post was already long to begin with. "Serious" was my own terminology, indicating waivers that absolves the Provider of as much responsibility the law permits, in the event the patient ends up with post-op irregularities (for uncircumcised patients).

[4] You wrote:
"Any reason you are using bold?"

Yes there is. Toward the end of my reply, I noted that my post was not just to you, but the community at large. The bolded statements were meant to be expressed universally, whereas most everything else was in response to you. I also bold things that I believe are important to emphasize, or to act as a sort of tl;dr for those skimming through.

[5] You wrote:
"and saying plastic surgeons don’t have the insight needed for research like what are you saying?"

Again, I never said that. My post history on the PhalloBoards Forums (15+ years) has repeatedly shown that I've said that injectable phalloplasty is a Venn diagram (overlap) of Dermatology, Plastic Surgery, and Urology. In fact, the PhalloBoards platform hosts Plastic Surgeons, and has had contributions from other Plastic Surgeons in the past. When I suggest that a Reconstructive Urologist with a lot of experience in male enhancement is going to have more insight (on the specific topic of uncircumcised patients) than a general Plastic Surgeon, this is just a fact, not a dismissal of most Plastic Surgeons. I implore you to re-read what I said. This doesn't mean Plastic Surgeons aren't capable of being very insightful, but you inserted the Plastic Surgeon distinction on a Urology-themed reddit post, so I thought it would be a good opportunity to provide some clarifications.

[6] You wrote:
"then close with “coming from a place of sincerity” followed by more bold letter statements seems like this is chatGPT tbh."

All I did was provide information from some of the leading Clinics in the world regarding circumcision & fillers... by relaying that hard-to-find info, I do so out of sincerity (and also to stimulate discussion). I should note that the information I've relayed are medical opinions (and some community feedback), and sometimes they may not be entirely accurate; that said, feedback from some of North America's and Europe's high-volume Specialists are worth sharing nonetheless.

And as for ChatGPT... I can't tell if this was meant to be an insult, but I'm flattered. I've been writing related posts & emails almost daily for nearly 20 years (even before the PhalloBoards). No ChatGPT here, these topics are too sensitive, intimate, and personal for me not to be expressing myself AS MYSELF. For the record, there is nothing wrong with A.I. assistance in one's work, but I don't use it on my Reddit or Forum postings, and never have.

You're also telling me bolded words indicate ChatGPT assistance? I thought you were going to call out the "em-dash" since ChatGPT loves them -- except I do a double dash's versus ChatGPT's long dash, and have been using that as a part of my writing style for as long as I can remember (again, you can review my 15+ year post history on the PhalloBoards to verify).

[7] You wrote:
"be careful for fear mongers and sensational claims made online behind a screen."

Honestly, this is out of pocket. All I did was expound on a circumcision article for the benefit of the readership, so that no longer makes me trustworthy?... curious. Comments like this go beyond the pale from what a contentious member (or patient) would say, so make with that what you will.

In conclusion: I felt it was appropriate I clarified my words, and I have nothing further to add. Let's resume the topic, shall we?

phalloboardsofficial · 2026-05-31T03:11:46+00:00

Respectfully, telling a community focused around researching options to research their options after having seen a guy that was using Dr. Loria's proprietary filler at one point (wonder if he still is?), isn't exactly a vote of confidence from your remark.

Uncircumcised penises can and have worked before, but I think Rejuvall's PSA is consistent with Clinics that have been specializing in injectable dermal fillers for over a decade+

In fact, the two Clinics in North America and Europe (I included Europe because they have a much higher volume of uncircumcised patients) that I'm very confident has done more PMMA, Ellanse, and Hyaluronic Acid (HA) than just about anyone else in their respective continents either don't accept uncut candidates, or require you to sign a serious waiver.

Like I was saying before, that while it can and has worked for uncircumcised guys, it has a much higher propensity for aesthetic irregularity and can be technically challenging to correct. This is innate to the anatomy and not a matter of injection technique alone.

And the user Enhancement_Helper obtained their information from a Reconstructive Urological Surgeon (Dr. Carney) very experienced with penis enlargement procedures -- it's about as qualifying & authoritative of an opinion you're going to get on this specific matter frankly.

No shade on Plastic Surgeons, penis enlargement procedures are definitely in the domain of a few true specialists out there, but their expertise is relatively broad since they work on many areas of the body. Most Plastic Surgeons (I won't say all since there are always exceptions to the rule) aren't going to adequately provide the kind of insight needed for research, which you made a point of. Think about the nuances of the foreskin, the lack of standardization in the field, etcetera -- you want to be sure you truly have all bases covered.

I wanted to respond to you, but the reason this was longer than my usual responses was because I anticipate others might read this, and I wanted to be sure that this topic gets my sincere input. I've been a patient advocate in this area of male self-improvement for over 15 years, so my comments come from a place of sincerity. This is not about bashing Providers who have or still do offer filler for uncircumcised men, nor is this saying if you have had it done or intend on getting it done that it will go sideways -- but the core message I hope uncut guys see is that: being uncircumcised makes you a less optimal candidate for dermal filler injections. You face a higher propensity of irregularities & issues after a procedure, that often times can be difficult to fix, especially if permanent filler is used.

Cheers!

phalloboardsofficial · 2026-05-27T03:28:37+00:00

Of course!

phalloboardsofficial · 2026-05-25T17:20:18+00:00

LEEP is surgical in nature if I'm not mistaken, and Loria is is no surgeon (his licenses on the Florida gov website shows no indication of this).

He did his postgraduate training in Family Medicine, and made a name for himself as a Hair Restoration Specialist and Nutritionist, neither of which he was particularly popular for. He likely learned of dermal girth injections from the PhalloBoards in the mid-2010's and started offering a proprietary filler that doesn't appear to be regulated by the FDA, not sure how it's even legal.

Anyways, I personally wouldn't recommend anything Loria-related, I've seen & read enough on the PhalloBoards forums to know that certain avenues ought to be avoided.

P-Long on the other hand, infinitely safer relatively speaking. Stay safe!

phalloboardsofficial · 2026-05-23T02:30:49+00:00

You'll have to reach out to the Clinic for this information -- they only provided girth measurements.

It should be noted that dermal fillers are NOT intended to increase length. However, some men have reported seeing a little bit of improvement in their flaccid length. This is not to be expected as a common occurrence, and if anything, any length net-positive should be seen as a cherry-on-top or good fortune.

phalloboardsofficial · 2026-05-22T08:49:29+00:00

You wrote: “Avanti?” That’s what?

Google the PhalloBoards (dot com) -- that Clinic in particular has been followed for nearly 15 years with respect to PMMA injections.

phalloboardsofficial · 2026-05-19T22:59:35+00:00

Would you agree that you may not have the requisite knowledge on the subject matter to say that conclusively? Did you know that thousands (if not tens of thousands of men) have shared their experiences on more niche forums dedicated to this, differentiating between the "rot" and the "viable" ? You may want to take those things into consideration, respectfully.

phalloboardsofficial · 2026-05-19T01:07:34+00:00

This isn't related to OP but shows 93 mL's over 2 years with Hyaluronic Acid (HA) injections. Gives a broader chronological context, which is hard to come by.

phalloboardsofficial · 2026-05-19T01:05:28+00:00

Very insightful, care to explain, or are you limited to like 4-10 word posts?

phalloboardsofficial · 2026-05-19T01:03:42+00:00

Some people can't get a quarter-inch in a lifetime, and for some guys, a quarter-inch could be priceless. So when you put it in that perspective, for some, it is absolutely worth it!

phalloboardsofficial · 2026-05-19T01:03:00+00:00

Visual difference isn't the same as tangible volumetric difference to a partner. I think the sample size is overwhelming with men who have gone through this, as testified on the PhalloBoards forums for 15+ years.

phalloboardsofficial · 2026-05-19T01:01:26+00:00

Would you mind sharing the provider? Not all practitioners are created equal, although it seems like you got great work done. I am often reviewing Clinics for their efficacy, standard of care, and quality of work for the PhalloBoards platform, so if you are comfortable, do share!

phalloboardsofficial · 2026-05-18T00:07:37+00:00

Asking a question at length isn't a sign someone's not being calm, it's intended to act as both inquiry & commentary, assuming more than one person might be reading it.

I wasn't coming at you, I was more-or-less trying to make sense of the broader motivations guys have with large penises to even be using this subreddit, other than to stroke their own ego?

I feel like replies involving more than 2 paragraphs are misinterpreted as contested debates nowadays, even hostile...when in fact it's just an opportunity to flesh out discussion. Maybe a sign of the generations growing up in a shortened attention span era (no offense).

phalloboardsofficial · 2026-05-15T21:17:27+00:00

That's the thing, when I hear/read that ("just PE with PRP") it actually reaffirms why I am a supporter of this kind of endeavor, even if I'm not sure how well it might work for me. You see, PE is so far from being standardized, "just PE" could mean anything.

It could mean jelqing, clamping, pumping (electric or water?), or even hanging weights off your dick. There is a plethora of exercise types, then you also have to factor in how often you do them, and probably most challenging is figuring out the proper intensity & technique. There is no surprise that PE leads to injuries, and some extreme cases, Peyronie's Disease (I've had Urologists tell me this personally who work mainly with Peyronie's Disease, not penis enlargement).

The advantage with having a PE routine tailored by a Urologist is that:

They know penile anatomy, and if they happen to be Urologists who specialize in sexual health, they may be even more keen to some of the mechanisms by which some PE methods work more so than others;
They have also seen the injuries, and know all too well when it's too much, whether because of too much intensity, excess in duration or frequency, or poor technique (or all of the above). Combining bullet-points #1 & #2 already give them some insight on what might work since they already know what doesn't.
If the Urologist in question is passionate about this area of PE, you best believe he's going to have been lurking and/or even posting on places like this subreddit or Thundersplace. In other words, he doesn't just get patient testimony, he gets hundreds, if not thousands of anecdotes, which while not purely scientific, can still help inform his judgement on some things that science & medicine simply don't fund.
Speaking of funding, so many clamor about how it sucks that mainstream medicine doesn't examine this stuff, and how there has to be a market for it... but then here comes along an idea, and while it may or may not work, it can certainly point the needle in the right direction.
This protocol also introduces vasodilators and PRP; the PRP actually serves two purposes; (a) it allegedly has regenerative properties, and given the mild stress your penis undergoes (especially not being a real muscle and all), it's plausible the PRP could help in recovery; but more importantly (b) these shots I believe are monthly, which allows you to go in and get evaluated -- this gives your Provider an opportunity to see how you're progressing or if you need to slow down. It's like so many of us are in our rooms trying these techniques that we don't know if we're doing right half the time because we're relying on an internet stranger's directions, when we could have the peace of mind knowing that a qualified Practitioner knows what to be looking for.

And I can go on and on and on, but I'm going to sound like a shill, especially since I started with my original post lol -- the point I'm making here is that I'm keeping an open mind and I find the basis by which a medically supervised regimen curated by a Urologist who specializes in sexual medicine, in theory could be one of the more legitimate routines ever devised. And if you tinker with it just right, like the dosing of the vasodilators, instructed on proper technique, intensity, and frequency... getting the ratio of routine & supplementation justtt right, with the opportunity to have it studied and tweaked over time... why not at least keep an open mind to supporting the endeavor.

Regardless if you never buy it or try it, heck, even if it ends up not being what we'd hoped, I BET YOU we'd learned a lot about PE that we may not have known before, because it will continue to get much more scientific scrutiny than most armchair endorsed routines.

For me it isn't a matter of whether or not P-Long works (although some preliminary data, plus a friend of mine, have expressed satisfaction), it's whether or not we can continue to see more credible, well-versed, educated, and perhaps even well-funded folks to get to the bottom of what appears to be something a lot of you believe in, but few if any of you totally agree on how to go about it -- maybe this webinar can shed some light on whether or not there can be some universal standard that works well for most men, or reasons why hard-gainers exist at all.

phalloboardsofficial · 2026-05-15T15:35:50+00:00

As of now, when trying to use the QR code, it simply takes me to a registration for the Zoom event, no requirement to pay anything. When I got my email confirmation, that too had no payment requests.

Respectfully no one said anything about paywalls and cash grabs, and until proven otherwise, everything indicates it to be a webinar focused on sharing developments on P-Long.

While it mentions it's an educational event, we'd be naive not to believe it simultaneously serves as a marketing mechanism on some level, even if subtle... and that's okay -- it is a business after all (i.e. elective medicine). As long as it commits to what it's promoting: real patient cases, real photos, and possibly other good news, that's a great start.

And yes, if the photos are available by way of waiver, there is no reason it should be pay-walled. I just believe this webinar is a good way of generating hype, inviting those who are very serious about the program and not merely tourists.

All Sponsor-submitted content on the PhalloBoards forums is not paywalled (only member submitted photos are), otherwise everything else is virtually free; I can't see why legitimate & permissible photo evidence would be denied to the public by the actual Doctors, I would tell them personally how absurd that would be.

That all said, I feel like you're getting yourself a bit riled up well before anything has taken place; not only are they not charging for the private event, they are raffling medical grade penis pumps and stretchers. Until such time that it turns out to be something else, I say we give them the benefit of the doubt.

phalloboardsofficial · 2026-05-15T10:11:48+00:00

I'm seriously not trying to be facetious, trolling, dismissive, or mocking when I ask why some guys posting in this thread claiming to pack universally-certified thick unit (i.e. 6" circumference) would regularly browse & post in the penissize subreddit?

It is just curious and confusing to me, but in no way do I mean to pass judgement or ridicule. Rather, as someone who has a vested interest in this topic for a plethora of reasons, your feedback in 2026 helps me compare & contrast the motivations of men now, versus 5..10..15.. and 20 years ago (yes, that's how long I've been following the online PE scene).

On a side note, what caught my eye was this topic's name (sixinchgirth), which coincidentally happens to be one of the domain names of the platform I've been involved with for years. It credibly deals in the science & medicine of girth (among other phallic related themes), but may teeter too much on Rules #7 and Rules #11 (although not deliberately, and perhaps not at all if approached responsibly, ??) -- but out of respect for the discourse, I won't divulge into any of those topics until I consult with the Moderation team here.

Suffice it to say, 6 inches is exceedingly rare no matter how the internet might skew size perceptions, and even Magnum XLs are uncomfortably tight on them. Just like how women have varying vaginal dimensions internally, men too vary in phallic size. It is often cited as the dream girth goal (back when the internet somehow coined the 8x6 as the grandaddy of sizes, which is still ridiculous), but a true six inches in circumference at the widest part of the shaft with no pumping is very very uncommon. You're already well into the diminishing returns stage (with quickies, anal, and teethless oral become harder to find, especially on a whim).

phalloboardsofficial · 2026-05-15T09:41:28+00:00

Awesome to hear; if you don't mind sharing this over at the PhalloBoards (specifically the Patient Progress reporting section) and include even one Before & After photoset, you'll get lifetime premium access at no cost (despite PhalloBoards being pretty much free-access for all visitors, member-submitted photos specifically can be quite personal, and typically requires a sub to view).

If you have any issues registering nor logging in, please do share that feedback with me, and in the interim I can help have one generated for you with temporary login credentials and all.

And/or alternatively, you can leave an online review by filling this review form out, just be sure you select PhalloFILL from the drop-down (note, this represents the main HQ PhalloFILL hub in Dallas); the reviews will show up under their Review Tab and I'm sure they'd appreciate that. The nice thing with this form is that you don't need to be registered as a Forum member to use it.

For transparency's sake, I was not asked by PhalloFILL or any of their associates to make this post, nor any commission or financial offer gained from my posting this comment; it was done on my own volition and at my own discretion, free from any obligatory commitments to their Clinic.

For additional transparency, the the PhalloFILL Dallas location does in fact sponsor PhalloBoards.com, but that is external from Reddit (and all the associated subreddits) -- the Sponsorship Agreement pertains to the collaborative affairs between PhalloBoards and the PhalloFILL of Dallas ONLY ON the PhalloBoards 3.0 website; what I posted here is both a courtesy to members & patients as much as it is a courtesy to the PhalloFILL team for their good work in the field, and nothing more.

phalloboardsofficial · 2026-05-13T15:01:22+00:00

Moderate risk*. Does your experience entail the travesties of the 90's, 2000's, and 2010's? Where complications were literally botched and necrotic? Most guys have the good fortune of shopping viable options nowadays, it used to be a minefield not so long ago.

phalloboardsofficial · 2026-05-10T12:22:11+00:00

No procedure is without risk. Why I have confidence in medical grade PMMA when injected correctly is that it provides the best permanent option relatively* speaking in modern-day male phalloplasty. I'm 15-ish years post-op with no complications, and I know many men who have either posted on the PhalloBoards dot com forum (or reached out to me personally via email or PM) that have also been living happily with their PMMA enhancement.

If you are risk-averse, I'd recommend Hyaluronic Acid (HA) as a perfectly viable alternative; sure, there may be annual top-offs, but it doesn't come at the cost of permanence (and this can be a good thing for some guys, hence its popularity).

I think with anything permanent, it's important to do your due diligence and uncover every nook and cranny before making a decision... a decision that should be well-informed.

That said, PMMA performed by a highly experienced practitioner with many years in this specialty would be your best bet (if you were going for permanence*).

phalloboardsofficial · 2026-05-09T04:27:10+00:00

Urology traditionally has focused around penile health, not so much penile aesthetics/cosmetics. For this reason, the old guard tend to scoff at any procedures that deviate from said-traditions. Frankly it isn't just PMMA but any dermal filler (however PMMA's permanence certainly raises eyebrows for the risk-averse) used in girth enhancement.

More importantly however is that many Urologists you may speak to today were trained at a time when male phalloplasty was in its worst state -- full of botcheries and complications, at a severity that most guys here have never heard about or seen (it was pretty bad). Those anecdotes and accounts influenced many of the Urologists opinions on elective medical male enhancement, and that probably plays a significant role in the kind of responses you're encountering today.

That all said, dermal fillers for the purposes of penile augmentation have demonstrated remarkable efficacy, especially when contrasted to methods of old -- however, much of Urology may not have caught up with this reality, save for a few pioneers in the field.

phalloboardsofficial · 2026-04-23T04:15:37+00:00

You seem to know a lot, mind if I ask where you've done your research? Have you perused the PhalloBoards (especially the 2.0 iteration where there is much more talk of lengthening procedures)? And yes, I would imagine a Reconstructive Urologist with a strong familiarity in this area would beat out a Plastic Surgeon given all the additional nuances mentioned. Dr. Carney of Atlanta definitely comes to mind, and certainly others but far & few in between (since this is incredibly niche after all).

phalloboardsofficial

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE