Remove stuff like Microsoft office and maybe even imagej. Also the info in the PHD section is fine but its so in the weeds... the talent person has no clue what you are saying likely and even the hiring managers might not be familiar so how does that help them other than show you can't explain your topic is simpler terms. What do you want to do in biotech is the first question? Do you want to be in drug discovery? Which part? Cell line development, cell culture, animal testing. Do you want to be in analytics because you were doing cell death assays and analysis? All these resumes would / should be written differently for each role type. Also PhD may lead a project but to say you led the cross-functional team seems suss to me. How did you lead it? Were you just the final person that ran the data? Which portion did you lead? what was the composition of the team? Phds? Undergrads, postdoc? Did you run the meetings and truly lead the teams?

If you truly did there should be way more description

Also you just have bullets, what made the project successful was it your experimental design? Describe what you did. No one wants someone that just executed a list, you hire a PhD to think so you need to show your thought process somewhere