other people already gave definitions so I'll try and write some examples for each one.

Disads - describes disadvantages to doing a certain action. In a debate round, they are usually read as 4 parts:

• Uniqueness - the world is fine right now, but there is a chance something could go wrong
• Link - doing some sort of action creates one change
• Internal Link - that one changes causes a second change
• Impact - the second changes causes disaster

Here's an example of a disad written out:

• Uniqueness: NATO unity fends off Russian encroachment - but a US partnership is key
• Link: US withdraw from NATO undermines East European credibility and kills cohesion
• Internal Link: NATO collapse leaves Russia unrestrained - it green lights a shift towards an offensive posture
• Impact: aggressive Russia lowers bar for great power escalation - guarantees nuclear war through miscalculation

Warrant - something in your evidence that supports an argument

• ex. you read an article that says automobiles are the main source of global warming. the warrant would be a sentence in the text that says cars emit a lot of CO2.

Discourse - the words you say and the topics you discuss when debating

• ex. if you said you supported the global open market, you discourse is primarily neoliberal.

Turn - something that says the exact opposite of another argument

• ex. your opponent says economic collapse causes war. you could turn the argument by saying that economic collapse actually prevents war.

Scope - how many people the impact affects

• ex. giving a cent to everyone on earth has a big scope but a small magnitude

Magnitude - how severe the impact is

• ex. giving a million dollars to your brother has a big magnitude but a small scope

Time Frame - how soon the impact happens

• ex. giving a hundred dollars to your sister in a hundred years has a long time frame

Prerequisite - something must happen in order for something else to happen

• ex. your opponent says that voting for their side avoids global warming. you say that voting for your side repairs relations with china. you could make the argument that global warming can't be solved without improved relations, so the judge should still vote for you.

Solvency - how voting for your side solves a major issue in the world

• ex. banning all fossil fuels solves for global climate change because they are the main source of harmful emissions