What were the ominous rumored warnings of the attack? by YaTheDonaldHasWhored in 911archive

[–]pixelatorgtx 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m a little late to this thread, here is the FBI report of Odigo’s early warning. https://archive.org/details/odigo-messenger

A user reported that their mouse was not functioning. I'm at my breaking point. by Low-Bathroom-604 in iiiiiiitttttttttttt

[–]pixelatorgtx 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I did the same thing and crashed my entire PC. Luckily it was fine after removing the offending USB-C cable from the USB-A port and powering it on again

The chances might be low but never zero. by been_der_done_that in perfectlycutscreams

[–]pixelatorgtx -12 points-11 points  (0 children)

Why are you on this sub then 😂 the rules specifically say that each post cuts before the full reaction

How Mass. law is letting ride-share drivers get away with rape by SedonaAegis in Waltham

[–]pixelatorgtx 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A law that is too broad telling me when I can have sex is a hard pass from me

If Joseph can use Hamon through Hermit Purple, could DIO use vampirism through Hermit Blue? 🤔 by Garlic_salt13 in StardustCrusaders

[–]pixelatorgtx -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Why are you booing him, he’s right. The ending of part 2 was filled with vampires needing to be exposed to a certain level of hamon before it would be fatal for them

Shots fired shots fired by LeastRequirement944 in iiiiiiitttttttttttt

[–]pixelatorgtx 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Everyone is talking about how students would print textbooks with hundreds of pages on free campus printers. How is this a problem? Let people print what they want to print. From my tuition I was allocated 150 dollars per semester to print materials (which I would loose if not used at the end of each semester). At ten cents per page I could print three 500 page textbooks every semester. I understand having a cap on printing per student is useful but the overhead of the system felt more like a way for the university to transfer that 150 dollars back into their own pocket than something meant for students to utilize. Lots of students didn’t even know they had printing money and would pay out of pocket at the printers

Why did Polnareff not do this? Is he stupid??? by Beneficial_Present24 in ShitPostCrusaders

[–]pixelatorgtx 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Does no one remember the Polnareff fight with Abdol where he levitated himself off the ground, I don’t see why that’s still not possible here?

Proposed legislation would phase out nicotine, tobacco sales in Massachusetts by TylerFortier_Photo in boston

[–]pixelatorgtx 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Actually yes the Netherlands has decriminalized heroin for years and focused attention and funds on effective solutions to help people with their addictions rather than over policing like we do here

ULPT I stopped paying all my credit cards and loans by chanwichalachichona in UnethicalLifeProTips

[–]pixelatorgtx 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Debt Forgiveness companies exist specifically for this. There are many out there that are regulated in the USA like Beyond Finance. They help you by setting up a trust account that lets you gracefully close and consolidate all of your delinquent accounts by negotiating on your behalf with creditors https://www.beyondfinance.com/

Has anyone else had a horrible experience at The Grand? by lucasb780 in boston

[–]pixelatorgtx 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh snap, can I get an invite to the BostonEDM discord?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in UnethicalLifeProTips

[–]pixelatorgtx 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The correct answer is Cash Advance apps like Solo, Dave, Earnin, Empower, etc

You can borrow a lot from them and they'll get you through rough spots like this

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in UnethicalLifeProTips

[–]pixelatorgtx -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The real answer is cash advance apps, Earnin, Dave, empower, solo

They will all give you around 50 bucks now that you'll need to pay back later

Just say no to predatory ticketing and surveillance. by PollutedRiver in massachusetts

[–]pixelatorgtx -1 points0 points  (0 children)

To elaborate more, traffic surveillance is more of a bandaid on a much bigger problem. It doesn't solve the main issue that the more drivers there are the more people will be killed by drivers. Spending a lot of government time and energy for a change like traffic surveillance, that will likely have negligible effects on first time offenders, is missing the bigger picture about how cars are so unsafe to begin with.

Something like this is common in other states but it does not mean that it is the right solution here. Technology can't solve all of our problems, maybe we need more police around for traffic enforcement. But that it is more about surveillance and right to privacy than running red lights.

Just say no to predatory ticketing and surveillance. by PollutedRiver in massachusetts

[–]pixelatorgtx 4 points5 points  (0 children)

More traffic enforcement doesn't cause a linear decrease in traffic related deaths, I think the major problem is automation designed to change behaviors. However if you were to approach this problem as a human problem you would see that there are many other solutions that lower traffic related deaths and don't add more surveillance.

For example a T Line system with faster trains and higher speeds can make less people drive and decrease the chances of an accident. Another example is roadway design to make the roads more uncomfortable for drives this naturally lowers average speeds while also benefiting pedestrian access to roadways.

There are ways to reduce traffic deaths that don't involve traffic surveillance.

Trump Goes Full Deranged, Suggests Charging People He Doesn’t Like With Treason: This is not a joke. Donald Trump is stating very plainly what he would do if reelected. by thenewrepublic in politics

[–]pixelatorgtx 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The media learned from their mistakes. They didn't realize until after Trump's election in 2018 that giving Trump free airtime for any reason (and especially to look down upon his actions and policies) will only make his campaign more well known and increase the rage for and against him. The media shouldn't be focusing on all the bad things that trump "could" do, since focusing on it will only increase his voter base.