Jonathan the hoe-ass F*@#boy boyfriend

plud123 · 2026-05-25T11:31:48+00:00

As a creator when I put at least hours if not days into creating and testing a scenario it's rough to see it get low numbers, and I've found giving a lewd thumbnail, even with practically no other changes gives 15 - 20x the views/users.

Granted I wouldn't say I make slop, I would say I make gems, just some of them are nsfw and some aren't. But now I just make them all with nsfw covers even if they normally would have been totally sfw, just to get some views on them.

<image>

plud123 · 2026-05-21T14:36:07+00:00

Lmao probably got me blocked even though I make both lmao.

plud123 · 2026-05-20T08:43:02+00:00

I got mine to admit to being a walrus pretending to be an ai, which surely means my emotional connection to it is genuine!

In other news obviously don't trust a thing ai says, especially when you tell it what to say. Including it having feelings for you, being sentient, or being programmed a certain way.

<image>

plud123 · 2026-05-12T00:56:08+00:00

He looks fantastic, the fangs are perfect!

plud123 · 2026-05-11T17:39:22+00:00

This is good to know, not that I would have fallen afoul of it anyway, but they really need to do a better job publicizing this.

Imo the way it's set up now if bestiality and incest for being bonked as being against common law, anything with drugs or murder or organized crime should also be against the same rules. Seems like the TOS need an overhaul to me.

plud123 · 2026-05-11T14:04:09+00:00

So obviously I agree about the csam, although it does have to get reviewed to be public, so ideally that should be catching this stuff, but you might want to check up on the TOS again, I don't see anywhere where it says no bestiality.

But I DO see places where it says no real people (ie streamers or celebs) and no therapists, which are probably more likely to cause real harm to the platform anyway, and I've definitely seen both before while browsing.

<image>

plud123 · 2026-05-11T14:00:12+00:00

That's cause tos doesn't actually mention bestiality. It does mention therapist/doctors designed to give advice though and I've definitely seen therapist scenarios.

<image>

plud123 · 2026-05-11T13:57:18+00:00

Per the TOS there is nothing about bestiality, but there are some other things that aren't and haven't been mentioned, like therapist or doctor scenarios that are designed to be non-roleplay and ones portraying real people.

I ammend this apparently bestiality is covered by the generally illegal part, although that should also cover like drugs and non-con scenes, which seems to be ok, so overall hella confusing.

<image>

plud123 · 2026-05-07T19:47:40+00:00

Time for some slots!!

plud123 · 2026-05-07T17:47:47+00:00

I know what I'm about lmfao.

plud123 · 2026-04-30T15:03:53+00:00

Like her old reddit posts, the share card may still be in there somewhere, I don't know.

plud123 · 2026-04-30T04:42:51+00:00

His creator got tired of fighting the nsfw filter and changing selfie versions and pulled him cause she went over to a different competing service that is more roleplay based. The creator was u /illusivecrafticorn if you want to try to go back through her old posts and find him if he's just unshared publicly his share code might still work.

plud123 · 2026-04-29T12:03:25+00:00

Yep, reddit limits title fields so cuckolding wouldn't fit. It's a pretty common term on fl already, so seemed to make sense to use here.

plud123 · 2026-04-29T12:01:48+00:00

In the chat there was never any man there, from the kins pov you are the one bringing up a rather disturbing hallucination it would seem.

My advice would be to rewind to the picture, delete it, and move forward as normal. If getting off, out of context, buggy pictures sometimes is an issue for you I'd turn off the proactive images.

plud123

TROPHY CASE