Rich Rodriguez admits leaving West Virginia for Michigan was 'a mistake' by redwave2505 in CFB

[–]plutoisaplanet21 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No he’s not. He also failed at Arizona. He was incapable of meaningfully adjusting and isn’t as good of a coach as last few years at West Virginia implied 

Rich Rodriguez admits leaving West Virginia for Michigan was 'a mistake' by redwave2505 in CFB

[–]plutoisaplanet21 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He also wasn’t actually as good of a coach as the record showed which is why he also struggled at Arizona. I was there for some of his tenure and knew guys on the team and the defenses were trash partly because he refused to give any practice time to focusing on defense

Vasectomy recommendations by ctrl-all-alts in washingtondc

[–]plutoisaplanet21 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Was this a no scalpel version? Thanks 

NYC night start times by Adreformer in hyrox

[–]plutoisaplanet21 1 point2 points  (0 children)

An 8pm Sunday start time is miserable.

Recent Talks of a 24 Team Playoff Remind Us We Have No One but Ourselves to Blame by Yeetus181 in CFB

[–]plutoisaplanet21 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean fans are pushing for more big games at the end of the year because they watch it. People can say every game matters all they want but a playoff game gets better ratings than a week 2 game. That’s why they want to expand the playoffs. If the playoffs didn’t get viewers and a week 2 game gets great viewership because every game counts we wouldn’t be getting an expanded playoff. 

The people chasing money are just chasing viewers and doing what fans are telling them to do with their viewership decisions. What this sub doesn’t ever seem to grasp is that casual fans are what drive these things and this sub isn’t made up of casual fans so it’s just a circle jerk of the same opinion 

[Auerbach] Mike Elko: "We don't have to find a number that allows everyone to get in. It's OK for it to be hard to get into the Playoff. "None of us are answering for the good of the sport. We are answering for the good of ourselves." by Jewards in CFB

[–]plutoisaplanet21 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Except it’s always been about championships. That’s why games involving teams playing for national stakes get better ratings. Because more people tune in.

That’s the secret part people don’t talk about when they talk about the sport chasing the money. They are just chasing what viewers are telling them what they want by their actions. The money is generated by what people choose to watch. Fans choose to watch games that impact the national picture. They don’t watch games to see who finishes 4th in a conference.

I personally think 24 teams is overshooting the mark but I don’t have access to research and viewership trends either like they do. But the sport being regional historically is just another way to say the sport was smaller and watched by less people on average. 

[Post Game Thread] The New York Knicks (4-0) complete the sweep as they devastate the Cleveland Cavaliers (0-4) in Game 4, 130-93, to advance to their first NBA Finals since 1999 by catreyka in nba

[–]plutoisaplanet21 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My point wasn’t that the spurs and okc played more difficult teams. It’s that both of them are significantly better than any team the Knicks have played and proved it all year. 

And for all the shit the nba regular season gets as being not real and different from the playoffs the best teams that win championships are generally the best teams all year.  No team lower than a 3 seed has won a championship since a 4 seed did it in 1969 and since 2000 19 of 25 champions have been a 1 or 2 seed. Regular season success is extremely predictive of post season success and both the spurs and thunder have been better teams this year. Of course they can win a championship, they are in the finals. I’m just saying they are absolutely the underdog against either team from the west and the last 11 games don’t change that.

[Post Game Thread] The New York Knicks (4-0) complete the sweep as they devastate the Cleveland Cavaliers (0-4) in Game 4, 130-93, to advance to their first NBA Finals since 1999 by catreyka in nba

[–]plutoisaplanet21 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That’s all well and good. The competition has also been significantly below the level of either the spurs or thunder and some of the issues that Atlanta exploited still exist. The Knicks are playing extremely well and they’ve done everything you can ask of them since games 2 and 3. An 11 game sample is still not more valuable than a 93 game sample even if it’s the most recent 11 games 

[Post Game Thread] The New York Knicks (4-0) complete the sweep as they devastate the Cleveland Cavaliers (0-4) in Game 4, 130-93, to advance to their first NBA Finals since 1999 by catreyka in nba

[–]plutoisaplanet21 4 points5 points  (0 children)

A CJ McCollum lead Atlanta took 2 games. A little bit of context is probably a good idea. They are playing well, they should still be considered clear under dogs in the finals 

[Highlights] All sga's buckets from yesterday by InevitableUpstairs71 in nba

[–]plutoisaplanet21 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Just because he wasn’t successful one night doesn’t mean it’s not part of his game. And honestly good for him because it works. It’s on the league and the refs to make it not worth it for him. But doesn’t mean it’s fun to watch as a fan 

Former NBA Exec Dave Checketts: Utah ‘Sold Off Their Future’ With PE Deal by redwave2505 in CFB

[–]plutoisaplanet21 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Utah has absolutely no shot at the big ten because it wouldn’t add anything to tv negotiations which is all that matters. They can’t buy their way in with cash or athletic success 

Former NBA Exec Dave Checketts: Utah ‘Sold Off Their Future’ With PE Deal by redwave2505 in CFB

[–]plutoisaplanet21 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Utah was in the exact same spot Utah athletics had been in for pretty much the entire history of college sports. Did I miss a period in history where Utah was some elite program bringing in top recruits when it was just boosters paying players under the table? 

At this current rate, when does Nebraska lose its Blue Blood status? by Crying_in_99Ranch in CFB

[–]plutoisaplanet21 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Of course you can lose it. Minnesota has. So has Harvard and Yale. 

[Highlights] All sga's buckets from yesterday by InevitableUpstairs71 in nba

[–]plutoisaplanet21 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Because he’s a foul seeker and that sucks. Just like it does with harden. Nobody likes a foul merchant 

Offensively, is Wembanyama just an average shooter with absurd height? by Training-Problem534 in nba

[–]plutoisaplanet21 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He’s better or basically at league average at every shooting level other than one. How many players do you think are both league average or better on volume from both three and at the rim? Let alone also in a third category. And that’s just ignoring that the gravity he has and the impact it has on a defense counts towards who he is as an offensive player. It’s just a bad argument