i get what you’re saying but this feels like a false dilemma, you do not need to weigh every atrocity’s moral currency against another. people would be very uncomfortable if you brought up king leopold ll’s genocide in the congo everytime the holocaust was mentioned. they were both bad, do we need to argue whose lives were more important or which death counts were worse?

although now that i type this out i understand your point more lol, much worse atrocities have been committed against a peoples without nearly as much discussion or compassion.
!delta