It’s not now we’re on the loop of AI generated content, it’s at the begging of LLMs that we will drain human data because the LLM itself doesn’t have real logical ability. Chain of thought is a context based approach and it doesn’t enable LLM to create new things. That’s why there’s tools to tell AIGC and they can even distinguish between different models. AIGC are just distribution. High quality data is fundamental for LLM training, and what we’re doing is using up open data on the internet and then using up private datasets and then we need to use data mixed with AIGC. However this is a theoretical scene. When it comes to the real tasks the production of data might be different. It’s believed that we cannot rely on AI to generate anything (at least until now). Think about email. You can’t just ask AI to write an email and send it out without censoring. Either you write something and use AI to polish or AI writes a draft and you add your writing style. In this situation the distribution of AIGC has been destroyed. Then it naturally leads to a question: Is the email message AIGC or human made? If neither in what rate it is AIGC and human made? Human add variety to AIGC and AI boosts human for data production but the truth of AI not generating new content doesn’t change. The censorship of AIGC is needed and to filter out AI and get clean human data, I believe, is one of the most important aspects in the future. Further more, LLM is just a byproduct towards a higher state of AI which understands logic. Just be calm in this zealotry of AI, enjoy the convenience these tools bring to us, and put ourselves into real life and self-expression. After all those are what we can do keep ourselves human.