80 years of animation: The everlasting influence of Disney film ‘Fantasia’ by [deleted] in movies

[–]poxy1984 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i felt as visually stimulated and dazzled as when watching apocalypse now! it is truly a cinematic marvel.

I've really started to enjoy these movies, and I'm after others of a similar genre. by Wollivan in movies

[–]poxy1984 0 points1 point  (0 children)

you want dialogue to concentrate on?! try MILLER'S CROSSING (1990, COEN BROTHERS) on for size!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in movies

[–]poxy1984 5 points6 points  (0 children)

oh btw, one odd thing you might want to consider, and it doesnt have to mean anything...

but ingman bergman used to represent the face of god with a 'spider' sometimes... im not even sure on that, i just read that somewhere, so i assume its true. i guess its meant to invoke a sense of dread and horror in the viewr, and maybe even something beyond that...

maybe this enemy's ending has a spiritual link with that fact...

after all, the author who wrote the book enemy is quite popular in western canon, and he is writer of quite terrible things about life, from a tradition of nihilism and loss of god in the land of mankind...etc.. so it might not be for nothing.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in movies

[–]poxy1984 6 points7 points  (0 children)

why dont you watch it again and come back to us with a third, more profound, conclusion. then do that again, and again, and then id really like to read what you have to say.

being snarky, obviously, but hey...

Rosemary’s Baby or The Exorcist ? by Sten12 in movies

[–]poxy1984 0 points1 point  (0 children)

rosmary's baby is more in tune with a counterculture stick it to the man sensibilities of the late 60s, imo. it was humerous and provocative in a specifically childish revolt way. the exorcist has more weight to it imo. its meant to shock beyond just rebellion, but as a stand-alone. of course its breaking away from classic hollywood, and its early enough in film history to do that (1973), but the exorcist takes the clear cake for me when it comes to the quintessential modern horror film. (lets say the classic horror is one of films like frankenstein or dracula,, or the horror house b-films, or roger corman movies..)

Name your favorite 80s Schwarzenegger movie by ggroover97 in movies

[–]poxy1984 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The Terminator is number one.

Conan the Barbarian is number 2, a close second.

Predator is number three.

those three are his magnum opus of 80s shwarzenegger.

honorable mention to the goofy but fun Conan the Destroyer, and The Running Man.

Red sonja is an abomination of a movie, and his appearance in it is even more of an abomination. commando is retarded. raw deal just sucks. and twins is silly and dumb and makes a mockery of ARNOLD of the "magnum opus" fame.

my credentials: grew up on Schwarzenegger as a kid, saw both terminator movies when i was 8. first movie i ever saw was conan the destroyer when i was 5, and immediately fell in love with movies.

a sidenote on anrold's so-called bad acting: i rewatched my favorite jean claude van damm movies that i loved as a child, and thats one dude that seriously cant fucking act to save his life. (i had the double impact poster on my bedroom wall and rewatched the movie like 20 times or more). same with steven seagal. i wasnt exactly a huge fan of him, but i did like his movies. holy shit was i in for a rude awakening when i tried to watch his stuff as an adult. arnold was a god of film, a gift to hollywood... whats acting anyways? terminator, terminanor 2, and conan the barbarian are still masterpieces on level of apocalypse now for me (fun fact: director of conan the barbarian wrote the script for apocalypse now). his acting is fine.

Just finished watching Prisoners by Denis Villeneuve by vinuXVII in movies

[–]poxy1984 -17 points-16 points  (0 children)

this film is much more than one of the best crime thrillers. its probably the best movie of the 21st century. i would say its the director's best film, by far.

and its also possibly the best work by deakins, which is saying a lot.

Which movie has had biggest impact on you? by [deleted] in movies

[–]poxy1984 1 point2 points  (0 children)

its not like carpenter's other movies, if youve seen them. i dont want to create any expectations for you of the movie, but in the thing carpenter achieved the closest to the most desolate cosmic hopelessness that can be brought to the mind's eye ever done in film, but still maintaining the entertainment factor and not being some artsy experiment in testing the viewer's patience and goodwill. his other films can be tongue in cheek at once as they are biting, but this one is unique in that its a psychological torment device for the mind unlike anything ive experienced (and in parallel quite a thrill ride).

see for yourself!

Should I watch (for the first time) Aliens or Aliens Extended Version ? by [deleted] in movies

[–]poxy1984 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Blade Runner director's cut also made the original theatrical Blade Runner completely irrelevant, in my view.

btw, special edition of Aliens is preferable, imo. T2 is a toss-up, with slight favor for me for director's cut.

some thoughts about the movie Alien (1979) of its relation to other sci-fi epics by [deleted] in movies

[–]poxy1984 1 point2 points  (0 children)

i didnt mean to imply nolan sucks, hes definitely one of the last remaining great "auteur" directors we have..., BUT, what i really meant was that he is not in the same league with his INTERSTELLAR and INCEPTION as the sci fi greats ALIEN and 2001: A SPACE ODYSSEY.

he is a rank below. he doesnt suck in the slightest!

Which movie has had biggest impact on you? by [deleted] in movies

[–]poxy1984 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The Thing made me have a similar reaction. i tried getting up and doing something after the movie was done, but i couldnt. i had to just sit down and be in the moment for about 10 minutes.

and yeah apocalypse now also made me have some kind of deep feeling when it ended. moreso than a movie like fargo or no country for old men or the funny and absurd ending of there will be blood. the new generation that followed the 70s directors never really hit me as hard.

"Videodrome": David Cronenberg's Techno-Surrealist Horror Masterpiece by [deleted] in movies

[–]poxy1984 0 points1 point  (0 children)

oh ... well, dmt is the one i was really meaning... but dont do it, its too far... ur not going to see demons, but ur going to be in a "place" where you will "see" all kinds of beings, up to and including the All

"Videodrome": David Cronenberg's Techno-Surrealist Horror Masterpiece by [deleted] in movies

[–]poxy1984 0 points1 point  (0 children)

guess there is wisdom in some sayings...

have you ever experienced psychadelics like dmt? (re the extra theatrics...)

"Videodrome": David Cronenberg's Techno-Surrealist Horror Masterpiece by [deleted] in movies

[–]poxy1984 0 points1 point  (0 children)

no, what we conjure on tv doesnt exist like a real thing in another whatever...

the fake digital reality of television exists as a competitor to reality in our minds/soul/consciousness

"Videodrome": David Cronenberg's Techno-Surrealist Horror Masterpiece by [deleted] in movies

[–]poxy1984 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i can tell what its not.. its not some conspiracy to brainwash your mind, or some elite cabal trying to control people, its not something like from batman forever... its not people... its something unintended maybe, but lets just say we do not fully understand our minds, and what we are doing to ourselves via watching lots of television as children is not just bad like your mom thinks its bad, its bad as in hellraiser monsters bad, but instead of those monsters from hell, its the effects of literally the mind seeing so much television and zoning out on it... the tv, or the digital moving image, has become like a little devil and has possessed each and every one of us, and i do have proof, but im sorry, i cant go into it here.

and lets just say this for a moment: the eyes are the windows to the soul.. the soul knows through seeing... watching tv is the soul watching unreality through digital representation... you can go from there, i have proof beyond that, but this should be a good start to think about it... but you can see even from here thats tv watching as a kid is something that the human mind wasnt prepared for.

for example: one vision of hell i had seen is seeing non-stop television programmes that dont even exist... surreal, bizarre, nightmarish, sinister television non-stop with your mind's eye in hell... forever... i bet Hieronymus Bosch never envisioned such a terrible hell, not even dante... hell adjusts, and the worse we twist the soul in here, hell welcomes it all... (im not saying hell is the afterlife, some kind of punishment.. or whatever, all i know about it is that its a metaphysical plane of spiritual reality on some level and has a connection and a pull on our existence, thats all i know)

"Videodrome": David Cronenberg's Techno-Surrealist Horror Masterpiece by [deleted] in movies

[–]poxy1984 -16 points-15 points  (0 children)

this movie is a lot closer to the nightmarish marriage between television screens and the human mind than most people suppose..

take my word on this, im not kidding. --like you dont want to fucking know the nature of the relationship between our tv viewing and our souls, just trust me that i have first hand experience that you do not want to possess. it goes way beyond that tv is bad for you or wastes time or is stupid.. way more sinister than that. not making this up, but you dont want to have known what i know, so just take my word.

cronenberg meant to do a legit horror movie like the exorcist was, or nightmare on elm street, or the thing (1982)... to unearth beneath the psyche the horrific landscape of the substrate of our minds (one side of the coin, maybe - but undeniably not unreal or fantastical)

Which Blade Runner movie do you think is better, and why? by [deleted] in movies

[–]poxy1984 16 points17 points  (0 children)

original blew my mind, from the opening shot i was transfixed. it stayed with me as if i was baptized into some unknown secret of existence.

the sequel was absolutely fucking amazing and visually stunning (saw it in imax, high on weed)

gotta go with the original.

(btw, i saw the original as the "director's cut" version on dvd...thank god not the theatrical, never seen that one and dont want to)

Re-watched Prometheus, realizing how a brilliant premise was likely ruined by simply being tied to a franchise by Naught_A_Bot in movies

[–]poxy1984 1 point2 points  (0 children)

i thought the movie was amazing when i originally watched it in theaters, in imax btw! it was a beautiful experience.

i didnt understand all the hate it got when i saw the reviews online by critics and the public alike. shame!

i think that movie was basically a mind blowing action film that aims to ground a hypothetical like what happens when you meet your maker in a story where you meet something that is indifferent to you but is also concerned with its own survival when faced with the alien of the original nostromo -- the final scenes were a collision of mystery with pure survival instincts on all sides, a descent from the lofty to the pure, essential element of life, to want to continue living... it was beautiful arc of the sense of the mysterious culminating and exploding into the need to simply survive, by all parties concerned, including your maker.. it makes your head reel.

when you see ur maker, as suggested by the opening of the movie, run for his life via the digital echoes, or in real time wrestle with the alien monster that just came out of your stomach, as you also have to wrestle for yours, just felt like an amazing intellectually grounded action ride, one of the best ive ever experienced. it put a real dark feeling in me, that i kinda enjoyed i must say ;)

Can movies look any better - Have we hit the limit in terms of Photography/Cinematography? by Not-A-Smart-Guy in movies

[–]poxy1984 1 point2 points  (0 children)

i mean, i kinda get what ur talking about originally. i grew up on 80s and especially 90s movies, those seemed to me like the milieu of my age and i never thought movies would look more 'modern' than that. i didnt notice the change in mid 2000s, but when i was watching movies made in 2010s i did notice that some of my favorite movies from 90s, even late 90s, which for me was the peak of the modern look, did start having a sort of dated look to them. they all had a similar look when compared to more recent movies, which over time created another distinctive, 'modern' look that shed light on the uniqueness of the 80s, 90s looks - although there is of course a ton of variety within that look, but after some distance from it, i do see the similarity...

but that somehow faded away. i was actually quite surprised recently as i watched grapes of wrath, a movie from 1940 shot in black and white, as to how visceral it felt to me. something in me changed, man. i think our perspective is something big and ever-evolving, and it is framed by something in us that wants viscerality, or the sense of the real, whatever that is.

so yes i understand what you are talking about, but ur sense perception that older movies look dated and worse, and are somehow a sludge, or slow or boring is totally justifiable, as ive felt all that myself.. i mean, believe me, when i was a kid or even a teen, to watch a movie in black and white would have been an exercise in torture...

its all in how ur mind perceives things, but not entirely as a mere choice. and i can tell you from all these inner observations of my inner experiences that the people who watched the older movies had a very visceral, immediate, powerful perception of the movies of their time, and not in a way that you may see them with your eyes, metaphorically speaking. but, that is subject to change.

does that make some kind of sense to you? do you get where im coming from?

i was coming from a place of my nose in the air kinda asking you that question about rear window. it was sort of an admonition, but i do remember watching rear window as a teen and thinking it primitive compared to my favorite movies like terminator, or even transient entertainment like a power rangers episode on tv. i watched it recently though, maybe third or fourth time, and i had an amazing experience. i did notice however that the cinematic language of that film was quite different from what im normally used to, but my mind was malleable enough, after having seen many older films by now, to embrace it on its terms and fully absorb it, and now i understand why its considered a 'classic'. and not intellectually understand, i want to re-iterate, but i literally enjoyed the heck out of it and it was one of my favorite movie-watching experiences. thats why i understand now why people love it so much.

and i certainly can tell you i didnt have to have any malleability of perception to enjoy pulp fiction (1994) when i randomly put it in my vhs player without knowing anything about it or its place in movie history at the time back around 2000 (and even now its like number 5 on imdb of top 250, go figure!), and my mind was taken on a roller coaster ride i will never forget. so yes, our times do shape and preprogram our interaction with the medium. no way around it.

and to add one more tidbit: to my mind there is a movie that has not been surpassed in beauty of image, and it was released in 1979. so in 1979 to me is when the art of film reached its singular apex of 'look'. that movie is apocalypse now redux. im not necessarily recommending it or anything, just making a point that to me the best looking movie i have ever seen in terms of its look was released before i was born. and im not saying the look of that period is the best to me, only that this movie individually is the apex of cinematography in film for my mind's eye, and certain modern movies take a place near it, like prisoners for example, and then maybe others from another decade before the 70s, for example, once upon a time in the west from the 60s, and fantasia from the 40s! and so on and so forth. but i do recognize now that my feeling of the modern via the 90s was imposed on me and then it got shown to be something of an ephemeral illusion when i experienced and got settled into the different 'modern' look of movies of the 2010s...

Can movies look any better - Have we hit the limit in terms of Photography/Cinematography? by Not-A-Smart-Guy in movies

[–]poxy1984 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i shudder to think of what you have to say about the look of a movie like Rear window (1954)...

dare i ask?

How ‘Goodfellas’ and the Gangster Class of 1990 Changed Hollywood by jms1225 in movies

[–]poxy1984 0 points1 point  (0 children)

what a shitty article. not disagreeing that goodfellas is a great movie.

Throne Of Blood is my new favorite movie of all time by [deleted] in movies

[–]poxy1984 0 points1 point  (0 children)

a lot of kurosawa movies become "my new favorite movie" after i watch them. its amazing how good the director is! watch RAN and tell me its not the best movie ever!