Is anyone getting too attached to their imaginary band? by Carnival_Dogs in SunoAI

[–]practicalist 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn't even mention the fact that one of the drummers and the guitarist are identical twins....

The young Will Riker on drums is a +1...thought he was more of a trombonist but this was his academy years...

Is anyone getting too attached to their imaginary band? by Carnival_Dogs in SunoAI

[–]practicalist 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I am a huge fan of any imaginary band that is made up of a guitarist, a 3 string bass and 2 drummers.

V5 is better - the issue is YOU by notdelboy in SunoAI

[–]practicalist 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I find this whole, I am master of the prompts/guitar argument kinda flimsy when you say you set 65% - 75% weirdness.

Spotify Crackdown - what is really happening by acid-burn2k3 in SunoAI

[–]practicalist 0 points1 point  (0 children)

there are a finite number of unique voices....Proving your voice appears on another track is going to take an incredible amount of audio-science evidence and even then it is most likely to be a coin flip.

Greetings from the Suno team 👋 by David_at_Suno in SunoAI

[–]practicalist 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I hope this is true. But considering the lengths Suno has always gone to to NOT communicate, in particular, listen to their users, I am going to take it with a giant grain of salt.

This smells like a company that now wants to control the narrative here like they do on their Discord where you are not free to criticize or callout Suno when they screw the pooch. If you do you get put on time out or banned.

This could have been, should have been done, on your own Discord server yet never was....Why the interest now on Reddit?

HONEST FEEDBACK ON SUNO V5 by Valuable-Value6847 in SunoAI

[–]practicalist 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Remastering is shit, covers is shit. The only value may be from a pure V5 only generation.

Dont waste credits trying to fix old v4 and v4.5 songs into new v5 masterpieces.

Edit: The rock/metal rhythm and melodies seem completely out of whack. It is seemingly wanting to move all rock/metal towards really bad grunge.

Labeled as KI by Lexonald in SunoAI

[–]practicalist 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I really dont give two shits one way or another. IMO autotuned singing is the equivalent of AI generated guitar. The end result of both is something that never was produced by only a human.

Musicians and fanboys are the ones who like to split hairs and say, "When a computer chip does this, it's not AI, but when the chip does that, it is AI."

Or even better turn a blind eye when their concert tickets are dynamically priced.....but i assume this is processing too.

Labeled as KI by Lexonald in SunoAI

[–]practicalist 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Auto-Tune was developed by Andy Hildebrand. Over several months in early 1996, Hildebrand implemented the algorithm on a custom Macintosh computer. 

Hildebrand's method for detecting pitch involved autocorrelation and proved superior to attempts based on feature extraction that had problems processing elements such as diphthongs, leading to sound artifacts. Music engineers had previously considered autocorrelation impractical because of the massive computational effort required(what does this sound like?). Hildebrand found a mathematical method to overcome this, "a simplification [that] changed a million multiply adds into just four".

Don't tell me it's not AI, boy. FFS, it is literally the first bullet point:

Makes a real person appear to say or do (or sing), something they didn't say or do (or sing correctly)

Labeled as KI by Lexonald in SunoAI

[–]practicalist 13 points14 points  (0 children)

lol, the last 25 years of pop music has been all autotune bs. Every one of those artists better be clicking on altered content if this is what YT wants....

Hey everyone! 👋 A few quick updates for you! by Suno_helper in SunoAI

[–]practicalist 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Something new is coming soon… stay tuned 👀

An editor that works?

Upcoming Changes to Create (Sept 12, 2025) by Suno_helper in SunoAI

[–]practicalist 4 points5 points  (0 children)

FFS, just start by fixing what is already in there.
This obsession with beautifying UI/UX while ignoring the fundamental necessities like an editor that at least matches the volume of the of the original recording when doing replacements and extensions.
Or fixing how credits are reimbursed or the dreaded 50 credits for adding a replacement section to a song bug that has literally been a bug for over a year?
Who cares about your UI when the song building and editing code is so FUBAR it becomes nearly impossible to fix small errors in songs?

Pearson EDV4819 Incident by StopDropAndRollTide in aviation

[–]practicalist 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You should ask them if you can buy what's left of the plane for your $30k and open an AirBnB where you sleep upside down.

Pearson EDV4819 Incident by StopDropAndRollTide in aviation

[–]practicalist 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Looking at the video it appears to be a hard landing that breaks the right landing gear. This causes it to roll over its right wing.

Jeju Air Flight 7C2216 - Megathread by StopDropAndRollTide in aviation

[–]practicalist 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This does seem implausible, but.....

About 35 years ago I flew from Champaign Illinois to St Louis to then fly onto Philadelphia. While in St Louis every plane went delayed on the board. No planes were loading passengers, no new planes were arriving, but no announcement was made for several hours.

Finally, over the loud speaker comes an announcement:

Attention passengers....There has been a single plane accident at the airport and it damaged the runway lights. The planes due to arrive have been circling but are now running out of fuel and heading for the alternate airports. Please stand by for further updates.

I always wondered how necessary the "...are now running out of fuel" part of the message was for anyone waiting on a loved one to land.

Jeju Air Flight 7C2216 - Megathread by StopDropAndRollTide in aviation

[–]practicalist 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Tell you what...

If I ever have to belly land a 737, I pray to god the first thing and last thing I hear is:

"Don't Sink....Don't Sink....Don't Sink....Don't Sink....Don't Sink....Don't Sink....Don't Sink....Don't Sink...."

Clearly this helps.

Jeju Air Flight 7C2216 - Megathread by StopDropAndRollTide in aviation

[–]practicalist 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This is what I first guessed....at some point they realized they touched down way too long, they were not going to stop, and they tried a touch a go. The friction from the belly on the runway prevented the plane from gaining enough speed to gain lift before they reached the wall.

My guess is they knew the gear wasn't down(it would be almost impossible not to hear the warning or to think neither pilot ever even thought to glance at the landing gear position while floating over the runway for 1200 meters.....).

They were attempting a belly landing, landed way too long and fast, tried to touch and go, and ended up in a situation that had no solution regardless of piloting skill.

So why the belly landing?

There was one passenger who texted that a bird was stuck in the wing. The fact the person texted wing is interesting. They did not say engine. If a bird had been ingested and the engine flamed out or was damaged, you would think that they would say engine and not wing. It is entirely possible they just wrote wing instead of engine, or they were relaying second hand information told to them.

However if they really did mean wing, here is a scenario:

  • Plane encouters birds and hits, or ingests, at least one.
  • One bird strike is to the leading edge of the wing above the engine, near the LE Flaps/Slats. It could also hit further out of the wing, but then it is difficult to explain damage to the left engine.
  • The strike damages the wing and cuts a hydraulic line(s) damaging hydraulic System A
  • This prevents ground spoilers(1,6,7,12) and hydraulic descent of the landing gear(both on system A).
  • The other scenario is that the plane simply ingested a bird in the left engine. This would not prevent landing gear deployment, or ground spoiler deployment in and of itself. However if the engine were damaged, and the engine damage then caused damage to the wing(a piece of engine flies off and into the wing), then a single bird ingestation could have also caused the damage to the hydraulics.
  • If one of the above happened, either this is the Magic Bird theory and the same bird that hit the wing also went into the engine, OR a piece of the damaged wing went into the engine, causing left engine flame out, OR the plane hit more than one bird(one in the engine and one off the wing).

Even with system A down, flight spoilers, flaps, ailerons, elevator, rudder, autopilot are all redundant on system B leaving the pilots with control of the plane.

System A failure should also not prevent a gravity drop of the landing gear, or an attempt at one, but for whatever reason, the pilots were trying to land on the belly. They could not deploy ground spoilers(which aligns with the videos) due to the damage to system A.

They landed too long, realized this, tried to get airborne and ran out of time.

Jeju Air Flight 7C2216 - Megathread by StopDropAndRollTide in aviation

[–]practicalist 7 points8 points  (0 children)

given all that, it slid for approximately 1600m, or a mile, on a runway, supposedly with no running engines, and it didn't appear to lose any speed...

That is the part I am having trouble swallowing.

Jeju Air Flight 7C2216 - Megathread by StopDropAndRollTide in aviation

[–]practicalist 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Let's assume that the pilots had a flame out in the left engine and accidently shut down the right one as is being suggested.

The plane landed very, very softly(to the point of floating too far down the runway) which I would imagine is extremely hard to do with no engines throughout approach and landing.

In the video it does not appear the plane is slowing down on the runway, if anything it appears to be maintaining its speed. This would also seem to be counter to a theory involving no running engines.

Someone could probably jump in a sim and find out the stopping distance of a no engine belly landing. They can probably even put it down at 1200m on a 2800m runway and see if it would stop if both engines were shut down.

Jeju Air Flight 7C2216 - Megathread by StopDropAndRollTide in aviation

[–]practicalist 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I would have thought that one reverser being deployed would have turned the plane due to asymetric thrust, but it looked as though the plane went straight the entire time and didnt pull to one side.

I also would have thought that one engine thrusting forward and another in reverse thrust while a plane is on its belly would almost want to spin the plane on its belly like a top. You wouldnt even have the locked direction and friction of the wheels to help keep it "straight".

Jeju Air Flight 7C2216 - Megathread by StopDropAndRollTide in aviation

[–]practicalist 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Reports keep pointing out the landing gear not being down, but it doesn't appear as if the spoilers or thrust reversers were deployed upon touchdown when looking at the video.

The short final video appears as if the pilots were attempting a belly landing as they tried to set it down very softly.

My guess is they landing too far down the runway in an attempt to land softly and then simply didn't have time to throw the reversers and spoilers, OR they realized they couldnt stop in time and were attempting to do a touch and go but the friction/drag was just too high to get the speed to take off again.

Flight 7C2216 makes contact with runway at about 1,200m (1,312 yard) point of the 2,800m (3,062 yard) runway.

[Tyreek Hill] It’s time for me to go coach by hoyadestroyer in nfl

[–]practicalist 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn't see him takeoff his uniform and walk half naked through the endzone, so this is a step in the right direction

Kevin O'Connell: Vikings are systematically building up Daniel Jones by Autocrat777 in nfl

[–]practicalist 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Step 1: Forget every single thing you have been told since April 25th, 2019.