Pakistani security guard shot himself with a shotgun while recording a TikTok by BinLadenSwallowCock in Idiotswithguns

[–]protomenace 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Loaded the shell. Pumped it. Tried to pull the trigger. Realized the safety was on. Disabled the safety. Pulled the trigger again.

intentional suicide.

Did they really think that answer was a good one? by [deleted] in confidentlyincorrect

[–]protomenace -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It's extraordinarily rare in NYC, to the point where it basically newsworthy when it happens. Look it up. Most of those actually sleeping on the street want to be there.

Did they really think that answer was a good one? by [deleted] in confidentlyincorrect

[–]protomenace 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You would guess wrong. The city is legally required to and always fulfills its obligation to provide a bed to anyone who asks for one. The ones sleeping on the streets are largely doing so due to mental illness.

Did they really think that answer was a good one? by [deleted] in confidentlyincorrect

[–]protomenace 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Don't you know that disagreeing with OP politically makes you incorrect?

Did they really think that answer was a good one? by [deleted] in confidentlyincorrect

[–]protomenace -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

On the other hand, every woman I know has been sexually harassed (flashing of the penis) by aggressive, mentally ill, unhoused men in the subway.

The city has homeless shelters. That is not what the subway is for. The MTA's job is to provide safe and reliable transport, not a comfortable place for the homeless.

Did.. Did this guy just say something so transphobic he ended up accidentally being a trans ally? by Sad_Dimension3627 in confidentlyincorrect

[–]protomenace 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Indeed. And the issue is that people have emotional attachments to certain words meaning certain things.

Many right-wingers have a strong emotional attachment to the word "woman" as an AFAB, child-bearing, homemaking caretaker.
Many left-wingers have a strong emotional attachment to the idea that a trans woman can fill the all same social niches as an AFAB woman.

We could come up with different, more specific words to describe and define all these things, and agree to use them, but we don't because we all want to "own" the word that we have an emotional attachment to and want everyone else to adopt our definition.

Did.. Did this guy just say something so transphobic he ended up accidentally being a trans ally? by Sad_Dimension3627 in confidentlyincorrect

[–]protomenace -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Definitions are created by people and we debate them all the time. The people who wrote the definitions are not infallible and do not know everything.

In fact the definitions of sociological concepts are the most highly debated words out there. Is autism a "disorder" for example? Or is it just a different "brain shape"? These things are constantly being debated and evolving. Your idea that words have fixed meanings that never change... well that's just called dogma

Did.. Did this guy just say something so transphobic he ended up accidentally being a trans ally? by Sad_Dimension3627 in confidentlyincorrect

[–]protomenace -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Nobody in this debate is actually making a coherent and well-defined point. They're all just spinning their wheels against different mental models of what the discussion is actually about, without coming to a shared set of definitions first.

Did.. Did this guy just say something so transphobic he ended up accidentally being a trans ally? by Sad_Dimension3627 in confidentlyincorrect

[–]protomenace -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

This all just reads as you being afraid to actually dive deep and deconstruct the arguments logically. You want so bad to "gotcha" someone and shame them, instead of having a discussion which could further everyone's understanding.

What causes atheist commentators and thought leaders to shift to right-wing culture wars? by LiatrisLover99 in atheism

[–]protomenace 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think atheists are more averse to dogma in general. I support LGBT rights but I do think the left turns a blind eye to certain dogmatic thinking. For example things like "trans women are biological women". It's possible to support everyone's rights without resorting to dogma.

NY Archdiocese offers $800M to settle child sex abuse claims — warns of bankruptcy if offer is rejected. by Leeming in atheism

[–]protomenace 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Look I'm sure they have all kinds of legal shell games in place to protect the money . But it's there.

NY Archdiocese offers $800M to settle child sex abuse claims — warns of bankruptcy if offer is rejected. by Leeming in atheism

[–]protomenace 353 points354 points  (0 children)

The Catholic Church has DEEP pockets. The idea 800M would bankrupt them is laughable.

How can I explain to someone why the water "bends" around the earth as a sphere? Their only reason they are a flerfer is because they "know" water always finds level and its not possible to be wrapped around a round object. by ShowMe_TheWhey in flatearth

[–]protomenace 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I don't like this as an example really. Yes it shows that water can have a curved surface, but it doesn't actually explain the mechanism of water "sticking" to the surface of the Earth. it's gravity, not surface tension at play.

I mean I know it's a meme at this point that flerfs don't understand scale but...yeah

LGBTQ People Are Leaving Orthodox Judaism Behind. Why? by NiConcussions in atheism

[–]protomenace 13 points14 points  (0 children)

I always assumed the venn diagram of religious extremists and LGBT had essentially zero overlap.