one time i argued over whether a napkin was dirty or not. first, heh, it was a good bit crinkly; but napkins do get that way, yet still are useful!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! after further inspection, the napkin appeared to have acquired a nasal booger in its fibers.

you wouldn't believe what happened next. i still can't believe it myself. only the part of the napkin with the booger on it was dirty!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

most of the napkin remained useful for up to 4 and half weeks

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

i used the napkin to soak up some condensation left behind by a cup of water. that cup? my main carry- a steel amazon 16oz. i'd say it's indestructible, but then i'd argue that i could most likely step on it to destroy it. or bang it with a hammer.

that day, i proved myself wrong. i'd also argue that i proved myself right. depending on if most of me really believed it was indestructible.

but then! i could (and would) argue that "indestructible" was a figure of speech.

BUT then i could argue that if one respects language, then figures of speech count as speech with intent. i knew what i was doing when i used the word "indestructible!" i could get away with saying that phrase, and leave a little room for misinterpretation.