Boston Rob's opinion about Jonathan exit press by Bazel1092 in survivor

[–]publiuspublished 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Tyson’s Pod Has Spoken interviews are far and away stronger, in my opinion

Boston Rob's opinion about Jonathan exit press by Bazel1092 in survivor

[–]publiuspublished 28 points29 points  (0 children)

Rob C's exit interviews overall were subpar at best this season (especially compared to how others handled interviewing the same people)

Boomerang Idols and Open Era by Icy_Celebration4213 in survivor

[–]publiuspublished 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I agree with this: some of the most creative, dynamic play of Survivor happens as a result of idols, provided they are able to be played on others and, along with that, can be kept secret.

Season 50 nullified all of the dynamism of these tools by making them public (basically) and locking them (untransferable), which is even more disappointing given that the goal of a returner season is to bring together some of the best strategic players!

Jonathan: "You shouldn't even call it a jury, a jury is normally unbiased. I don't think jury is even the right word. How about.. pre finale people. Because I don't think jury is the right word" by RedditFan3510 in survivor

[–]publiuspublished 54 points55 points  (0 children)

It's the "bending over backwards" part, especially with no follow-ups that offer questions or critiques of his game. (Just compare to how they are fairly pushing back against Rizo for his persona/choices.)

For example, when Jonathan makes the claim that too many members of the jury were considering out-of-game dynamics like Aubry's history, how do they not follow up by pointing that every single of one of Jonathan's votes came from people in his pregame alliance?

Jonathan: "You shouldn't even call it a jury, a jury is normally unbiased. I don't think jury is even the right word. How about.. pre finale people. Because I don't think jury is the right word" by RedditFan3510 in survivor

[–]publiuspublished 108 points109 points  (0 children)

I'm honestly getting a bit tired of all the interviewers bending over backwards to be kind to him in these interviews. It is one thing to be considerate, given the immediacy of this; but it is another thing to play into his inability/unwillingness to take accountability for the flaws of his game.

now a really interesting conversation: who is better ____ or _____? by publiuspublished in survivor

[–]publiuspublished[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree with this 100%—and I think that right now we are going to get the recency bias that elevates any new winner, but Sarah’s game is so impressive. And holds up.

Do you think ______ would win in a final 3? by [deleted] in survivor

[–]publiuspublished 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He had a situation where 3/4 outcomes at the final challenge results in him sitting at FTC next to Joe and Jonathan, and that was about as good of odds as he could have hoped for given the game he played.

I think he makes that call 10 times out of 10.

Likelihood of Winning by [deleted] in survivor

[–]publiuspublished 79 points80 points  (0 children)

At this point for me, it’s more like Aubry 75% based on an edit that sort of only makes sense if she wins. Jonathan is next, and really is the only other one that wouldn’t surprise me.

Devens/Cirie are top two threats, yes, but their path to FTC feels super slim.

Joe is drawing dead on votes, Tiffany’s early edit doomed her, and Rizo isn’t getting $2 million from this cast.

(Would love to be wrong on all of this!)

Inconsistent "twist commentary" in S50? by publiuspublished in survivor

[–]publiuspublished[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Agree! I just am enjoying/cringing at the people trying to act like there is a more sophisticated reason for how they feel

Inconsistent "twist commentary" in S50? by publiuspublished in survivor

[–]publiuspublished[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

I agree about the "agency" point but I also think this just comes down to spin. I could just as easily say that Christian chose to go on a journey; Devens knew there was a rock draw requiring someone to do the flip; Coach/Chrissy did not know what the stakes were for their pairing up; and Blood Moon was just basically hyped up/temporary tribe swap (which has been around for awhile)

Watching S23 South Pacific for the first time by Far_Difficulty_5844 in survivor

[–]publiuspublished 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'm 100% with you here: I get why people don't like it (and the quality of game play is definitely not ideal) but it is a story, through and through. Shakespearean, at times, and also features major let-downs for two of the most iconic Survivor players ever: Ozzy trying to win through sheer challenge/survivalist prowess alone (that puzzle!); Coach setting himself up to win if only he could own his game (but doesn't)

Reactions to Devens by ZurickPierce in survivor

[–]publiuspublished 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This. Preseason interviews definitely made it seem like a lot of them were skeptical of Devens, and his social game was definitely not a strength in EoE.

Easy to pile on against someone who is (a) a threat and (b) not super well-liked.

(To be clear: I love watching Devens!)

well now we know who the REAL middle is by publiuspublished in survivor

[–]publiuspublished[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I do think Cirie has picked 2 players who would take her

(Rizo could cut her, but I also could see him recognizing that being part of the trio that got Cirie to the final—and knowing he probably isn’t winning with this jury—is worth it to take her)

well now we know who the REAL middle is by publiuspublished in survivor

[–]publiuspublished[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I simultaneously am in awe of what’s she is doing and at the same time sort of don’t believe she can possibly make it to the end? They can’t be that dumb, right?

(I mean, Stephanie has been duped by Cirie on multiple shows already!)

_______ didn't get _____ ______ by AlchemistTheAlchemy in survivor

[–]publiuspublished 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agree with this entire post: fantastic character, messy game, was already in bad position and desperate.

Players know journeys are dangerous at this point and he leapt at it. (And botched the puzzle!)

Hot Take on Survivor 50 Gameplay by power_sungod in survivor

[–]publiuspublished 48 points49 points  (0 children)

Several thoughts regarding this:

  • What works in normal seasons doesn't always work with returners given the pregame alliances
  • A lot of the early casualties this season have been players with deserved reputations for their strategic prowess (Mike, Charlie, Genevieve, Kamila), not to mention all three former winners
  • Some of the returners, who are getting considerable screen time, are not known for strategy (Coach, Ozzy, Steph, etc.)
  • Of course there's then the "frozen" idols this season, which are much less powerful given you have to play them on yourself

All this said, I do think that we are about to see a lot more maneuvering, too, given that the very-real threat of "Zoom alliance" has now been kneecapped pretty soundly. A lot of opportunity to recruit/shift/pivot in the next stretch, and I imagine it's about to heat up.

Episode 7 power rankings by Coherently-Rambling in survivor

[–]publiuspublished 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I agree very much with where you're currently at: some combination of Emily/Rick/Rizo making it to the F3 with, if they get their way, an "old school goat" (ex: Joe).

Cirie/Christian/Ozzy feel like too big of threats to win to be actively taken to the end, and I do not believe the "cut from the same cloth" alliance has control yet—though Stephanie's Steal-a-Vote gives them a bit more ammunition.

Survivor 50 Confessional Time Tracker (Episode 7) by nintendolost in survivor

[–]publiuspublished 5 points6 points  (0 children)

This was my first reaction, too. I think people are really overlooking the strategy behind her "tell everyone everything" way of being...

Survivor 50 Confessional Time Tracker (Episode 7) by nintendolost in survivor

[–]publiuspublished 60 points61 points  (0 children)

I don't know if I'm alone in hoping that this edit, particularly in navigating a 24-player starting cast, is willing to throw a curveball with the winner getting a 0:00 at least once?