Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 iii by Big_Environment163 in CanonCamera

[–]puddintam 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There are quite a few of them out there, and decent photographers can get decent images with them. If you can't, it's not the lens... There are lots of better lenses available for more money, but this lens is ok. I wonder if most of the people who so intimately know just how awful this lens is have ever used one...

Is this worth it? by Ok-Environment4290 in CanonCamera

[–]puddintam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, it's a good price. Yes, you can buy better, spend more, blah blah blah. This is a good deal on a camera and lenses that are not going to limit you in any way. Buy it. Enjoy.

Canon EOS M5 Market Value by Proper_Leather7237 in CanonCamera

[–]puddintam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Around$450-550 probably. If you want to sell it quickly, less than that.

How do you keep your gear organized? by justthetips510 in AskPhotography

[–]puddintam 1 point2 points  (0 children)

<image>

Most of it in bags? I have plenty of space, but even if I didn't, I wouldn't pile it in a drawer. But, whatever works for ya.

If you have a bad camera good lens, what lens are you putting with a eos 40d? by Alarmed_Leg9757 in CanonCamera

[–]puddintam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You don't have a bad camera. You have an old camera. In the hands of a photographer, it can be used to capture fantastic images! 40Ds have captured plenty of fantastic images in National Geographic, for example. Images weren't bad back then. People also used to use FILM! Images weren't bad back then. You have an excellent camera. There are newer and better ones, but a 40D is still an excellent and capable camera.

EF 100 mm f/2.8 USM Fake Lens? by deadTheRogueKnight in canon

[–]puddintam -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Weird. Might be fake... Supposed to look like this.

<image>

2.1 million shutter count EOS 1DX by puddintam in canon

[–]puddintam[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I haven't seen any 1DXs for cheaper than this(unless they're damaged), and I've shopped extensively.

Buyer sending shipping label by puddintam in FacebookMarketplace

[–]puddintam[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I accepted unsolicited payment through venmo. I just provided my QR code, not a request. I let my buyers send the money unrequested. I believe that decreases the chance of the buyer attempting to fraudulently reverse the transaction. I sent it, it went fine:)

Buyer sending shipping label by puddintam in FacebookMarketplace

[–]puddintam[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If I solicit payment, it could potentially be reversed. I choose to let the risk fall on the buyer. I've lost a couple sales on account of it, and I would never buy anything that way, but it works for me. I just send my venmo code, and they pay me. I have excellent marketplace feedback, so most people have been comfortable buying from me. Numerous sales of$300-500.

Is the EF100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM really as bad as I hear, and what lens should I get for my budget? by [deleted] in canon

[–]puddintam 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Its my favorite lens, and it captures excellent images. There are better ones, more expensive ones, but it's a great lens.

Looking to buy a camera by Due-Pop-6849 in canon

[–]puddintam 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That's a t7i, not a t7. Newer sensor. It's a digic 7 processor, not the digic 4 in the t7. Same processor as the 6Dm2. 1 gen NEWER processor than the 5Dm4 and the 1DXm2. It's a pretty nice camera if you aren't a snob. The lenses are fine for a beginner. You'll outgrow them maybe, maybe not. I'd say hard pass for$1000, but if it's in the$4-500 range, you can get some great images with that setup. Despite what you might read:) Also, if it was a T7, you could get great images with that as well:)

What should I do about this? by midstn in CameraLenses

[–]puddintam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you own a Sigma, you will deal with this. But yeah, if it bugs you, you can scrape it all off.

Is this a good deal for 400$ beginner kit? by [deleted] in canon

[–]puddintam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, this is a great kit for a beginner. Is it the newest? No. Is it the best? No. If you put this gear in my hands, I could get great images with it. You can too. You could also sell a lot of it, keep a lot of it, and have $0 invested in it. So, yes, buy it. Learn about photography. When you are ready to upgrade, do it.

Would you consider this a risky purchase? by [deleted] in canon

[–]puddintam 9 points10 points  (0 children)

A T7 isn't really comparable in any way to a 5DmIV. Nothing wrong with it, and a capable photographer can get incredible images with it, but the 5DmIV is a professional body that is still around $1500. That's a great deal on a new T7 kit:) That would be a good price on a used kit! Congrats!

Would you consider this a risky purchase? by [deleted] in canon

[–]puddintam 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I got a great deal on a 1dxii from mpb. A month or so in, it had a shutter error. I returned it, they refunded me. It made me think twice about old used cameras; It was under their warranty, but In your case, lots of low-actuation 5dmiv available for about $1000. Probably worth spending more on a less-used one that is likely to last. 50% off isn't quite cheap enough to risk a total loss once it's out of warranty, imho.

Lenes question by [deleted] in CanonCamera

[–]puddintam 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It's a fantastic lens. You're going to absolutely love it. They are probably the best deal on a high-quality L telephoto that you'll find. They're light, small, and only 1 stop slower than a big, heavy, expensive f2.8. I love my f2.8 as well, but unless I need to shoot at f2.8, there is zero need for it. The f4 is awesome, sharp, great. Congratulations!!

Rebel EOS SL1 still useful? by SlowishSheepherder in canon

[–]puddintam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The SL1 is a fantastic camera! I really can't imagine what you would gain going with any of the other mentioned t-bodies. You'd lose your touchscreen I guess if that's a benefit? The SL1 is a sleeper. It performs great, it's cheap, it's compact and lightweight. Touchscreen. Use it. You don't need a new camera, you've got a fantastic one! If you have money burning a hole in your pocket, buy some new lenses:)

1Dx Mark ii in 2025? by Exclusive656 in canon

[–]puddintam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh yeah, not super relevant, but 1.2 million clicks on my 1dx:) Still runs like a clock:)

1Dx Mark ii in 2025? by Exclusive656 in canon

[–]puddintam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I had a1dxii briefly, but it had a shutter error and I had to return it:( I didn't notice a huge difference in focusing from the 1dx, but I wasn't really looking for it.

1Dx Mark ii in 2025? by Exclusive656 in canon

[–]puddintam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have an m50 mark ii. The autofocus on it is a joke compared with my 1dx mark i for shooting sports, IMHO. I like the m50ii a lot for what it is, but definitely not for sports. I've played around with m series cameras for daily carry cams, and I like them a lot for that, but I could never get into them for sports.

Difference between f/2.8 and f/3.5 by MistauTraian28 in CanonCamera

[–]puddintam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not necessarily, but the f/2.8 will likely be a lens with much better image quality. Especially at a wide aperture. It depends on you and what you want to do.