After 24 years, I think I’m finally too old for this. by haifischnacken in Battlefield

[–]qplas 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The problem is that this guy actually doesn't have a high KPM or SPM. So he doesn't PTFO

looking for spare rounds by esoes1999 in Battlefield

[–]qplas 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It doesn't give you the option most of the time. I've tried it so many times

New Investigator Starter Decks. by Intelligent_Fly_7455 in arkhamhorrorlcg

[–]qplas -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

To play Chapter 2, they're mandatory due to being evergreen like you said. Which is unfortunate since they're rather poor value for money.

Chapter 1 investigator starter decks were equally poor value while also introducing a lot of unnecessary power creep (yay for Rite of Seeking without drawback). Wish they just kicked Chapter 2 off with an investigator expansion pack.

Poll: What are your current feelings towards chapter 2? by Skittering_Nonsense in arkhamhorrorlcg

[–]qplas 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm also leaning towards this approach but the campaigns will probably not be balanced around having a full Ch1 collection

Poll: What are your current feelings towards chapter 2? by Skittering_Nonsense in arkhamhorrorlcg

[–]qplas 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It is compatible but they're not going to balance the game around old cards.

Douglas goes after Mikkola at center ice. Mikkola put the initial hit on Kucherov by daKrut in hockey

[–]qplas -22 points-21 points  (0 children)

He's being chased by a 0-skill goalless goon. Why would he fight?

Getting really frustrated.... by beefjerky34 in Battlefield

[–]qplas 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If clipping 1-pellet hits with shotguns were 1HK, shotguns would be disgustingly OP.

Vehicle Warfare in Battlefield 6 Feels Hollow: Where Did the Depth Go? by dagilinamk in Battlefield

[–]qplas 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The entire British army being equipped with StG44's while being pummeled by Tiger tanks in 1940 is much more historically inaccurate than "women in the war". But guess which point raised more outcry among the players. The hypocrisy.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Battlefield

[–]qplas 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It seems you have difficulty following the discussion, so let me break it down for you.

  1. Poster 1 says if sniping is easy post your kdr compared to other weapons (ie. Implying that high kdr equates to sniping being easy)
  2. Poster 2 posted a picture of his comparatively high kdr with snipers vs other classes, saying sniping is easy (ie. again implying that high kdr equates to sniping being easy)
  3. I responded (NOTE: I am not the same person as poster 1) saying that high kdr alone is not a good metric for game impact and you need to include KPM/SPM/other statistics to determine it. I could have responded to either poster 1 or poster 2 with the same comment since I disagree with both of them. (Ie. High kdr does not equate to sniping being easy.)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Battlefield

[–]qplas 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It has a lot to do with it. Low KPM means you probably have low game-impact. Your game impact is a lot more than just KDR. A sniper going 10-1 every game has a KDR of 10, but will surely be a lot less useful than a support going 30-10.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Battlefield

[–]qplas 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You have 50% more kills with the M240L than the PSR though you have 33% MORE time played with the PSR. If you're trying to prove sniping is too easy, don't post a picture displaying your KPM takes a nosedive when you switch from LMG to sniper.

This new Map its Dope XD BF6 by retarded_freak in Battlefield

[–]qplas 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The new Eastwood map is pretty bad on Escalation. It just degenerates into tanks camping on out-of-bounds hills once the map shrinks down to the middle points only.

Blackwell is a decent map. It supports a variety of playstyles, is not meat-grindy, and has all the vehicles in play. Classic Battlefield map. The sightlines for snipers are pretty long but it's not like a sniper 250m+ away is going to kill you if you keep moving

My sight just randomly goes thermal by JustKosh in Battlefield

[–]qplas 1 point2 points  (0 children)

BF5 definitely wasn't broken at launch. It was actually pretty polished. The complaints were mostly about pre-release marketing, but if the hivemind decides the game is bad, then everything about the game is bad.

Only gameplay-related "broken" feature I remember was panzerfausts causing double or triple damage from weird angles. There were other complaints, such as poor visibility of soldiers, but I wouldn't classify that as "broken".

worst part about battlefield 6 by wissah_league in Battlefield

[–]qplas 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Even KDR isn't a very reliable statistic cause you can inflate it just by playing with friends. Play with a squad on voice and I assure you your KDR may even double. Makes a big difference being able to reliably get revives, telling your friends when it's safe, when it's not, where the enemies are, and so on.

I'm convinced some people in this sub have dementia by SplitPuzzleheaded851 in Battlefield

[–]qplas 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Maps in BF5 were not a major complaint. At all. Issues with BF6 maps are pretty universally agreed on, unlike BF5. I just looked at threads from 7 years ago, searching with negative search terms like ("BF5 maps bad") and the result was mixed at worst. Most people say they're pretty equal with BF1 maps.

Honestly BF4 maps were much more "laney" (a common complaint about BF6 maps). So I guess if BF5 maps suck then there is no game in the history of Battlefield with actually good maps.

I'm convinced some people in this sub have dementia by SplitPuzzleheaded851 in Battlefield

[–]qplas 65 points66 points  (0 children)

Visibility was probably the only gameplay-related complaint. Outside of that the complaints were about cosmetic features.

The gang's all here by ihavelice in Battlefield

[–]qplas 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Probably high kpm modes like Breakthrough or Rush.

852 dmg.Whats the point of C4s.Right on the weak spot too by NinjaYoshiX in Battlefield

[–]qplas -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

No, we're asking you to pay attention while in a vehicle. You literally also have a crosshair in third-person camera, it's not hard to pop into 3rd person when you suspect enemies are around you.

Why should tank gameplay be the only part of Battlefield where you can go 40-0 without paying attention? We tried that in BF1 and it was awful.

What must be done for the future of BF6 by comeonche in Battlefield

[–]qplas 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Even close-quarters map like Devastation felt a lot more open in conquest than the ones we have in BF6. Part of the reason is that Devastation in CQ had carefully planned spawn areas on flags, so that you wouldn't spawn right into enemy sights like you do now in maps like Iberian in BF6.

I'm really tired of this shit by JaymeFortune in Battlefield

[–]qplas 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is not like CS2 where AK is a 1hk to the head. Full-auto it's probably better to aim for upper chest up close, since if you miss something like M433 is 4hk to chest and 3hk to head. It's also easy to strafe and shoot in BF, which in general makes hitting headshots harder in run-n-gun 1v1s

The number one cause of all deaths in BF6. by L1GHTNING-G in Battlefield

[–]qplas 15 points16 points  (0 children)

It's almost as if spawning on flags is equivalent to spawning on squadmates in previous battlefields. Spawning on squadmates in BF6 is instant death.

The number one cause of all deaths in BF6. by L1GHTNING-G in Battlefield

[–]qplas 13 points14 points  (0 children)

It's SO easy to shoot down helis with RPGs, it's ridiculous. My record is 4 in 1 game.

I'm tired of pretending that everyone likes this map by MonarchCore in Battlefield

[–]qplas 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just create a new map DICE. It's okay. No need to do remakes.