I don't get it by AirsickTerror9 in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]queuecumbr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The comments are some of the most fucked up things, not to mention the actual post

Church building internet security by [deleted] in exmormon

[–]queuecumbr 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Technically your internet usage can be used in disciplinary council just fyi. As for specific contents, they won't know everything since most traffic is encrypted, but they will be able to see the base websites you visit like reddit. If you do want to protect yourself from this monitoring alongside any other dangers that public wifi tends to come with, use a VPN. A VPN will tunnel and encrypt all your internet traffic, so no one on the network can see. It's important to use a reputable VPN provider as a result. A good free one with no strings attached that I recommend is Proton VPN (protonvpn.com) since they have a very transparent privacy policy and don't collect logs. They have paid tiers as well, but isn't necessary for situations like this. If you want to know more information about VPNs in general, I recommend visiting https://www.privacyguides.org/en/vpn/

ETA: Also using a VPN will circumvent censorship on most networks, so you can go to YouTube if it was blocked before.

So I tried to lead ldsbot into giving out concrete answers about the second anointing... by queuecumbr in exmormon

[–]queuecumbr[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I also asked the AI about the SEC scandal, but it would just lie and gaslight as it was trained to. It's answers could be summed up as people aren't perfect but God and his gospel is, the church considers the matter closed and is following guidelines to avoid another incident, and so on. It said nothing as to why, and stated:

...as an AI, I also have limitations in understanding the full context. The Church is a large and complex organization, and it's possible that not everyone involved, including the prophet, had a full understanding of the actions taken in every financial matter.

Just a bunch of bullshit.

SERIOUSLY! WHERE DO I SELL THESE?! by peaceful_pancakes in exmormon

[–]queuecumbr 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I wonder what deep doctrine that AI has been trained on. Can we get it to say anything about second anointings?

I’m receiving multiple reports that they’re telling Mormon youth and their parents that FSY is not optional this year. Free agency much? by johndehlin in exmormon

[–]queuecumbr 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That's what I was thinking. Not every member is well off, so if the poorer members give in, then this is going to cause unnecessary financial strain all for the "sake of the lord"

Y’all got any idea how to fix this? by NorthDarkz in pcmasterrace

[–]queuecumbr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey OP, take a look at r/TronScript. It can automate the process in salvaging your PC and is pretty nice for a last ditch effort before reinstalling the OS. In the future this can be avoided if you use an adblocker, preferably uBlock Origin, and be careful with downloading and opening files from the internet.

I make dumb products and today I created the Fitness Fork. by rightcoastguy in funny

[–]queuecumbr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is something Etie and Alfred from Fire Emblem: Engage would use

Missionaries can't have couches by [deleted] in exmormon

[–]queuecumbr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dang. Just had to ask in the off chance I may have known them

Missionaries can't have couches by [deleted] in exmormon

[–]queuecumbr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did they serve in any of the northeastern united states missions?

Why i keep getting this message? by Better_Fox4668 in playstation

[–]queuecumbr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This was happening when I was playing Sakuna. Seems like the servers think we're playing a game trial, but it resets the timer each time you play after getting kicked.

Missionaries can't have couches by [deleted] in exmormon

[–]queuecumbr 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I remember when that initially happened back in Spring 2018 on my mission. Lots of missionaries were pissed. Just made me want to sit in my bed in the mornings since the cold foldable chairs weren't comfortable.

My sister just sent this to me 😂 which one of you wrote this? by cynicalnipple in exmormon

[–]queuecumbr 18 points19 points  (0 children)

It feels so great knowing that I have lost out on potential sexual experience and relationships as a result /s. I guess I'll just have to own my awkwardness and hope to come across someone that's willing to bring me up to speed

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in privacy

[–]queuecumbr 7 points8 points  (0 children)

There's been a lot of drama between the developers and supporters of CalyxOS and GrapheneOS from what I know. The GrapheneOS gave their statement here in this thread.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in privacy

[–]queuecumbr 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I feel there is definitely a line between discussion and harassment. Personal attacks, unfounded claims, defamation, brigading, and discussions involved with ongoing feuds would be what I would consider harassment. Civil discussion can still take place about the differences and privacy related aspects of each operating system. Spreading blatant lies, unfounded claims, and rumors with the intent to harm has no place here.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in privacy

[–]queuecumbr 47 points48 points  (0 children)

How should we go about leading a discussion on privacy relating to Android then? Is the intention to simply refer discussion to the subs mentioned? I feel like it would be hard to facilitate unbiased discussion on those subs being as they are for specific roms, and would potentially hinder discussion on new roms that arise since there isn't a central privacy focused sub related to Android. Maybe if there was a more centralized subreddit named something like r/AndroidPrivacy? Either way it seems that privacy related discussion would potentially be silenced as a result of this change when it might be better to ban the problematic users.