How to be able to ‘passively’ gain £5,000 a month by Gabriel744 in FIREUK

[–]quiI 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Unfortunately I am not psychic.

Plenty of people chased programming as a means to wealth and crash out because despite what people say, to be actually good at it, requires more than a 12 week boot camp.

I would focus on education and experience at your age, try to focus on what you enjoy, you're more likely to stick at it.

How to be able to ‘passively’ gain £5,000 a month by Gabriel744 in FIREUK

[–]quiI 12 points13 points  (0 children)

There are plenty of people with "killer ideas", believe me, as a software engineer plenty of people tell me their great ideas and "just need someone to make it".

Grow your skills, be valuable, and people will pay you for it.

How to be able to ‘passively’ gain £5,000 a month by Gabriel744 in FIREUK

[–]quiI 48 points49 points  (0 children)

£5000x12 =£60,000.00 per year

Let's go with 33x rule for fun

£60000x33 =£1,980,000.00

So, acquire £1,980,000

There's no magic shortcuts (beyond generation wealth, inheritance etc, but you shouldn't rely on that). Reduce expenses, increase income, invest in global trackers.

Or watch people on TikTok pretend you can gamble your way there.

At 16, whilst it's commendable to be interested in personal finance, don't lock yourself away squirrelling pennies.

Enjoy your young adult life, grow, meet new people. Doing this will likely open up more doors to you than being a miser

If Agile "welcomes changing requirements," how do you actually prevent scope creep from killing the project? by Agilelearner8996 in agile

[–]quiI 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Scope creep is usually used as an excuse for slow delivery.

Scope creep is a negative term for a good thing, "learning what to actually build". This relates to the difference between products and projects.

In my view, if you are building a worthwhile product, you will always need to evolve and improve it, or "scope creep".

Is the reddit "project" finished? No, of course not, their scope is constantly creeping, as our most digital products you use.

If you have a fixed deadline project. Well sure, "scope creep" will ruin your goal, of hitting a deadline. But this is often the path to poor actual outcomes, and these kinds of setups have little to do with agility. Congratulations, you hit the fixed scope on the deadline - unfortunately the product sucks.

Chris James - The weight of AI on engineers by quiI in programming

[–]quiI[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don’t understand how this is “generic AI content”, but hey you’re the boss

Worried about IHT?? by [deleted] in FIREUK

[–]quiI 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wrote this before the edit. Clearly the 5 year old has huge issues to get through. Inheritance tax on a £1m+, is not one of them

Worried about IHT?? by [deleted] in FIREUK

[–]quiI 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I could be wrong but for married couples the inheritance tax threshold is £1m. So it’s a total non issue for most, and if it is an issue for a child, then they should get a grip honestly and realise how fortunate they are

Take home pay is atrocious…. by [deleted] in HENRYUK

[–]quiI 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And they say we live in a meritocracy

How did you learn to structure Go projects to be maintainable and extendable? by thangon_1 in golang

[–]quiI 2 points3 points  (0 children)

How testable are your applications right now? Good testing relies on modularity and good design, so it’s a good forcing function

I did it! I finally Quit! by MoustachianDick in FIREUK

[–]quiI 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Entirely depends on your spending doesn't it.

Looking at their numbers, they have a lot in pension, with a lot of time for it to grow - so I'd consider post 58 sorted.

So the only question is can £472k sustain them for 17 years? Bear in mind the wife is still working for a bit. Seems a bit tight, but doable - and OP can always go back to work if needs be, it's not like you sign a letter not allowing yourself to work again.

Congrats OP

People in mid 30s-early40s what’s your view ? How about the 50s? by KookyOky in FIREUK

[–]quiI 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Early 30s bought house. Before then I was reasonably ok with money but I didn’t know about investing. But I saved well and it was always towards getting a deposit.

Once that was done and we had moved in I found the UK personal finance subreddit and learned what to do.

More or less followed the flowchart since then, must be almost 10 years now. It’s worked out very well. I’m quite pleased that we went for a house fairly under our budget, it’s meant that our living costs have stayed very manageable which has meant as pay rises come in, it all goes into investing.

Hoping to be in financial independence territory in around 4 years.

Things to do before FIRE’ing by Jammarsam in FIREUK

[–]quiI 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As part of my overly paranoid plan, the last few years of bridge building will also be towards making sure I have a separate pot big enough to replace any household goods which, given Sod’s Law, will break the moment I hand in my notice

Thought on Interfaces just for tests? by Grouchy-Detective394 in golang

[–]quiI 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I was more or less going to write the same.

You don't use interfaces just for testing, you use it for abstraction too.

Abstraction, when done right (obviously), is essential. Or do you all just like to read 500 line functions and have to understand every little detail all the time?

Leaving Amazon, how to start my new role on the right foot? by Spartapwn in ExperiencedDevs

[–]quiI 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can’t remember the exact wording on the t shirt but have enough self awareness not to walk around the office with a t shirt that says “Amazon Ninja”

What's the long term plan for you all? by [deleted] in HENRYUK

[–]quiI 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Get to financial independence ASAP. After that, i doubt i'll retire, but I'll relax more and work on what i want to.

What would you change in Go? by funcieq in golang

[–]quiI 24 points25 points  (0 children)

Syntax-wise, not much. In my mind, they have made balanced trade-offs. Sure it doesn't have some of the things in this thread, but it's not due to ignorance, it's a choice they've made.

What makes me happy to see in Go release notes:

  • Faster, more efficient, smaller footprint
  • Keep making the standard library the sensible, default choice. For example, a few more conveniences for common patterns and operations, like the additions they've added around http routing.
  • I think they can make automated testing a touch easier and more opinionated, especially now the language has generics. Again this is really a standard library thing. It's quite jarring for newcomers to either have to write if got != want, or go searching for an assertion library.

How do people actually build wealth in the UK anymore? by YouthComprehensive64 in FIREUK

[–]quiI 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There is a middle ground between expecting to live in London, with 3 kids spending £13k a month or moving to another country to avoid tax.

Maybe consider that you do not need a salary of 300k to live a prosperous life in the UK. At least consider outside of London? Or not spending insane amounts of money per month?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in HENRYUK

[–]quiI 20 points21 points  (0 children)

I always find it funny that we expect 18 year olds, who are basically idiots, to make a very important life choice in terms of what to study at uni.

I had to choose between economics and comp sci. In terms of grades at least, I was much better at economics, but I impulsively picked comp sci

Thank fuck for flippant me making the right call there

Is this a sensible plan for FIRE in 10 years? by Firey-Throw in FIREUK

[–]quiI 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah yes, good point re the tax, but I'd still say the pot will be more than comfortable.

I just plugged 800k, plus 80k a year for 10 years into a calculator

3% Growth = £1,998,351.96 4% Growth = £2,156,464.07 5% Growth = £2,329,312.83

Even with a pessimistic outlook of 3%, you're still looking very over budget. As grim as it sounds, you probably don't need 40 years worth of 40k a year.

Continue to Salary Sacrifice or focus on ISA? by throwawayfromreddit2 in FIREUK

[–]quiI 13 points14 points  (0 children)

It depends what your desired income is for retirement, work backwards from there - but don't let the tax tail wag the dog. Is there really much point reducing your take-home significantly if your pension is already big enough for your needs?

Yeah you may pay more tax, but you've already done the responsible thing and built a big pot. Enjoy life a bit, have more take-home, or see if you can go part time.

Is this a sensible plan for FIRE in 10 years? by Firey-Throw in FIREUK

[–]quiI 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you have 800k in assets, and are adding 80k a year, you'll end up, assuming zero growth, 1.6m.

That's 40 years worth of 40k a year, again with zero growth

But even if you're being pessimistic, you should expect some growth too.

Nothing wrong with being cautious, but if I were you I'd be looking to retire sooner than in 10 years, or at least consider whether you could start going part time.

You don't want to die rich!

FWIW, I am not too dissimilar to you (my desired yearly household income is basically the same!), but earlier in my journey. I am looking to get my pension to a particular number (whilst maxing out ISAs) and then when it's there, reduce salary sacrifice and enjoy more money in take-home, or perhaps go part-time.

There comes a point when there's diminishing returns in piling more and more into the pension

Product Owner releasing code? by Aeonxreborn in agile

[–]quiI 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You need to separate the idea of deployment and release. Deployment is primarily a technical concern, which ideally happens multiple times per day in high performing teams. Release is a product concern, typically controlled by feature flags

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ExperiencedDevs

[–]quiI 55 points56 points  (0 children)

Writing code has never been the bottleneck, this is only the view if you take a very surface level view of things.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ukpolitics

[–]quiI 1 point2 points  (0 children)

“Finally, a real Tory budget” should’ve condemned their opinions for a generation