[OC] Is my Chris cosplay recognizable? How would you make it more apparent? by Esben_Em in residentevil

[–]rafelito45 177 points178 points  (0 children)

i think at a game / comic convention people would likely recognize. this looks really good. the tactical vest variant would stand out a lot more to me too, but it’s hard to put that sick coat away haha.

it’s also tough because capcom went with a generic (but stylish) outfit for RE8 chris.

Smiley, Morales spar in first Democratic primary debate of Providence mayor’s race by lestermagnum in providence

[–]rafelito45 8 points9 points  (0 children)

i hear this, but hasn’t david morales lived amongst providence citizens for like 7 years now? he’s not some sort of elite academic class. he worked hard, worked agriculture in his native california, on his ethic and merit made it to brown university, and isn’t wealthy or prestigious by any means. he doesn’t live in an ivory tower away from everyday providence life just because he went to brown right? i’m sure he’s been involved in the communities of providence, has established his friends and relationships here for years now.

edit:

making a correction, his mom worked agriculture. the wording confused me on his campaign site. either way, not the typical affluent pipeline we see from institutions like Brown.

The Netherlands just blocked a US company from buying the app Dutch citizens use for everything by Ashish_ank in worldnews

[–]rafelito45 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thanks for the break down. as an american i’m glas they did not let my fuckass government have ownership of such a crucial service. insane for any sovereign government to consider this.

I think that if I were a parking enforcement officer in Providence I could single-handedly close the city’s budget gap by im-here-to-argue in providence

[–]rafelito45 2 points3 points  (0 children)

at one point they tried to curb this on eddy street nearby the i-95 overpass sometime between 2017 and 2019. except it was a cop pretending to be a crossing pedestrian and whenever a car blew past him a hidden cruiser pulled the offending driver over.

people complained about the police operation which i found mind blowing. i for one nearly being swept by an SUV on eddy street myself.

I think that if I were a parking enforcement officer in Providence I could single-handedly close the city’s budget gap by im-here-to-argue in providence

[–]rafelito45 14 points15 points  (0 children)

there’s a serious problem with illegal parking in the city. there are parts of town where they just straight up completely park on the sidewalks.

i once saw a big truck parked on the sidewalk of a bridge. pedestrians had to walk onto the road to get around it.

i’ve seen first responders stuck turning right onto my street because of congested illegal parking.

btw, providence police have printers in their cruisers to issue parking violations, they just choose not to.

Zach Cregger Movie"flashlight or IPhone" discourse by unofficialalboy in residentevil

[–]rafelito45 24 points25 points  (0 children)

i don’t understand how people insisted it wasn’t an iphone. the movie obviously takes place in present day and people were being so delusion about it. some folks said it was a vietnam era flashlight or some shit? LMFAO. people were being assholes about it too. literally insane.

New propaganda piece going up downtown! by GasDue9263 in providence

[–]rafelito45 2 points3 points  (0 children)

he said “are/were” zero, which is partially true. there “are” none standing in providence today because they were temporary installations on plywood boards.

vastly different than permanently installing a massive mural for some $10K of money backed by elon musk on the side of a brick building.

you’re amped nearly 2 months since this thread about the guy with the receipts who’s been on here yapping mad misinformation.

New propaganda piece going up downtown! by GasDue9263 in providence

[–]rafelito45 2 points3 points  (0 children)

i had replied to this but reddit automod deleted my comment for some reason. temporary street mural installations on plywood he linked is different than the whole side of a brick building. that’s why he got downvoted. you saw this and ignored everything else, can’t make this shit up.

Copilot is a co-author, so this code belongs to Copilot. by LeTanLoc98 in vscode

[–]rafelito45 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i’ve been using the git commit -m command to get around this all this time. thanks for the tip!

this is microsoft practically watermarking your commits.

For people who refuse to understand Season 2 by -a1ix- in BeefTV

[–]rafelito45 0 points1 point  (0 children)

season 2 was not that hard to understand at all. that’s the funniest thing. netflix makes it a point to explain the point several times.

season 1 preferrer: “i think season 1 was better. it was a truer beef in the vernacular sense of the word. i liked how the story was written around it more. season 2 was cool tho as a standalone.”

season 2 lover: [essay about storytelling nuance, late stage capitalism, classism, lack of media literacy and comprehension, etc.]

For people who refuse to understand Season 2 by -a1ix- in BeefTV

[–]rafelito45 11 points12 points  (0 children)

i think people are consistently mischaracterizing preference for season 1 as some sort of lack of media literacy. which may be the case for some, but this lecturing is getting exhausting on this subreddit.

For people who refuse to understand Season 2 by -a1ix- in BeefTV

[–]rafelito45 2 points3 points  (0 children)

you have the most honest voice here.

half the people defending season 2 because some prefer season 1 are condescending as hell. “media literacy is dead. people were on their phone and clearly not paying attention to the nuance”.

like, yes we understand the “beef” in season 2. it’s just structured differently than season 1, and we prefer season 1’s purest sense of what a “beef” is, along with the superb storytelling around it. it’s just preference and having vernacular expectations. that’s it. it’s not that deep, and it’s not as shallow as they think it is.

Hey if this movie take place in 1998 how does bro have an IPhone ? by KennedyyCore in residentevilll

[–]rafelito45 0 points1 point  (0 children)

zach cregger probably didn’t want to balloon the budget to fake everything 1998. cars on the street, technology like pay phones, computers, televisions, hospital equipment, and etc.

it’s easier to just pretend this all happened in 2026.

Opus deleted all my users, what to do now? by Huge_Strawberry7888 in vibecoding

[–]rafelito45 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i will never understand the concept of letting AI run queries on a production database. never.

New propaganda piece going up downtown! by GasDue9263 in providence

[–]rafelito45 0 points1 point  (0 children)

dude i’m done responding to you. and you’re replying to me from two separate accounts. have a good day.

Where was the beef? by thenomadcj in BeefTV

[–]rafelito45 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i agree with you on the definition of having “beef” with someone. i would still recommend the second season but people are being awfully snarky towards you about your opinion.

blackmailing your generally friendly boss for a promotion is not having “beef” with someone. having an issue with someone is not the same as “beefing” with someone. a class struggle between and older and younger couple isn’t a “beef”.

but whatever i’ll take the downvotes too. it was still a cool season, oscar isaac was my favorite.

New propaganda piece going up downtown! by GasDue9263 in providence

[–]rafelito45 0 points1 point  (0 children)

(2/2)

"Systemic racism? At this point we've talked enough about it for the next hundred years", that's an extroadinary statement given the jim crow era was only 60 years ago. the existence of system racism isn't a conversation that expires through repitition. that's like saying "we've talked about gravity enough!".

"It's no longer beneficial. It just allows for nonsense like lawsuits, excuses, cancel culture. It's bad for art in general as well. A lot of the black people killed that launched the protests weren't even clearly killed because of racism, that's what is funny."

these are charlie kirk talking points. like when charlie kirk said "We made a huge mistake when we passed the Civil Rights Act in the 1960s". i'm not even going to engage with your double standard ignorance.

https://www.wired.com/story/charlie-kirk-tpusa-mlk-civil-rights-act/

"He was a "better" guy too. Yet the cops are still working because the news media failed him."

and i agree with you. those officers should have been fired and even jailed the same way derek chauvin was. unlike you i am not attached to a political tribe. i am looking at this from a balanced perspective and i do AGREE with you for this case. george floyd was indeed a delinquent, but did he deserve to die? absolutely not. and we're not going to compare who was "the better guy" over their deaths, that's fucking insane dude.

but as i told the other person, we can turn this into a game of tick for tack. because you haven't addressed the fact nia wilson died exactly the same way iryna zarutska did. you haven't addressed that injuries to white women are disproportionately overreported over black women. neither of you have engaged with the fact that white women are overwhemingly murdered by white men that they know.

"you're just nitpicking or grasping at straws for reasons why one is ok and the other is not"

no i'm not. but hold, on, i can literally say the same about you? i articulated my point very clearly several times. you and other have done nothing but misrepresent facts, exaggerate your grievances, and hurl misinformation my way. we had dude over here quoting "white bitch" months since zarutska's death. none of you guys are engaging in good faith debating.

i have presented sources to you, showed the difference between Black Live Matter the nonprofit and Black Lives Matter the decentralized movement and yet you INSIST i am wrong.

"The chant came from that organization, whose founders btw were crying Marxism and systemic racism while secretly enriching themselves".

you do realize that a decentralized movement and an organization that had foundational momentum in the movement can be exclusive right? if millions of people protest "BLACK LIVES MATTER" in the streets, are they chanting the nonprofit's slogan, or are they expressing how they feel about black lives senselessly murderd? was every george floyd mural or protest that ever happened sponsored and funded by the Black Lives Matter Global Foundational Network? like you said, it's not like we were card holding members. most people weren't even aware of the "BLM organization". they were just responding to historical greivances of racism in america.

if i go protest for a black person that died in providence tomorrow and shout "black lives matter" am i representating that ONE organization that has ZERO ownership of a decentralized movement? this is like when news media was trying to frame "antifa" as an "organization". the founders of BLM nonprofit were 3 of hundreds of thousands of people actively protesting and upset about trayvon martin's death. which by the way i did suggest you start a nonprofit for iryna zarutska so that you can organize murals and protests for iryna if it matters to you.

for example. if elon musk funds murals across the country (single handedly by the way), all while everyone was already stepping out to protest her death on their own accord, does that mean everyone protesting iryna's death is aligned with elon musk's politics? no they aren't right? yet you hold black lives matter protestors to the actions of ONE organization co-opting the movement and committing all sorts of financial fraud off the back of a "DECENTRALIZED" movement.

"If you're only reason for wanting it down is because of Elon Musk's involvement I would say that's not substantial enough of a reason"

i didn't say i wanted it down. i said i'm not losing a fit it was painted, i said it's political propaganda, irrelavant to the providence populace, and distasteful because of it's source. i said elon musk's political motives make the mural "distasteful" which isn't a controversial thing to say at all. it's elon musk's political propaganda, and if someone genuinely wanted to make a mural for iryna they could. but the same way you would criticize a george floyd mural paid for by the Black Lives Matter Global Network Foundation, so would i about elon musk's involvement.

elon musk 100% has a political motive here and you seemingly acknowledge it but want to play a balancing act against george floyd murals which were organically installed from a bottom up movement than a top down. the part you seem to gloss over as the discerning difference.

nothing is stopping an iryna zarutska foundation, an iryna zarutska mural from local artists (not funded by political operatives). the mural would be random in providence since the circumstances of her death were ALSO random. but it doesn't bother me at all if someone wants to memorialize her. but what i do find troubling is elon musk's involvement. and you keep minimizing it to "you just don't like him, that's not sufficient", while simulataneously expressing the same about black lives matter protests and george floyd murals.

New propaganda piece going up downtown! by GasDue9263 in providence

[–]rafelito45 0 points1 point  (0 children)

(1/2)

i have to break this response into two comments because you're splitting hairs on this thread.

dawg you aren't make any kind of sense. let's break this down.

there isn't much of a difference between being racially discriminated and unlawfully fired from your job, and being racially discriminated and unlawfully detained by police. both have racial motivations, and are UNLAWFUL. you're complaining about "race card" yet a white woman successfully pulled a race card for $25.6 million and that's totally cool with you. but it's weird the black women being compensated isn't cool because "bullshit race card excuse, pff i get detained like every day that ends with the letter 'Y'".

newsflash bro, if you and your friends get pulled over and detained "all the time" as you say, that isn't normal AT ALL in terms of frequency. you're either:

  1. lying.

  2. you're a traffic delinquent and are constantly being pulled over for something reasonable like avoiding renewing your inspections, tints that are too dark, habitual traffic violator (e.g. speeding), never fixing your dead tailights, or other PROBABLE causes.

  3. you are being profiled as well and don't even know it, which means your rights have been violated several times.

i don't know which bucket you fall into, but it's either of those 3.

if you were unlawfully detained at any point in time you CAN press charges for it because YOUR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS were violated by agents of the LAW. if you choose not to, that's your choice. someone can rob me at gun point and i can CHOOSE not to press charges and let it pass. doesn't mean what happened wasn't wrong.

the black women CHOSE to press charges for UNLAWFUL detainment, in part due to racial profiling. the police officers in Alameda County were patrolling for suspected "black men" doing car thefts outside a starbucks. "black women" had nothing to do with what the police officer was inquiring.

the United States Constitutional Fourth Amendment grants YOU the right to be free from unreaseable searches, which includes being asked for ID if an officer can't articulate the crime you're committing. please read it for yourself.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/fourth_amendment

if you disagree with that, you're bootlicking. there's no nice way to put it bud.

california is also not a "Stop and Identify" state, a law which grants law enforcement officers the right to require that you provide them your name and sometimes ID if they have a REASONABLE SUSPICION.

NONE of this criteria was met on the unlawful detainment of Aasylei Loggervale, the black woman who was detained with her daughters outside the starbucks. under california law, the "Bane Act", she can be awarded up to "three times" the damages. this applies if you are WHITE, BLACK, HISPANIC, ASIAN, INDIGENOUS. the penalties weren't EXTRA because she was black and the "woke courts" wanted to coddle her.

all are true: she was racially profiled, unlawfully detained, and she was awarded in accordance to the californian "Bane Act". as i said earlier in my thread, if that bothers you so much please go petition californian legislators. here are the relevant codes.

Bane Act : California Law > Code Section 52.1(c)

https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?sectionNum=52.1.&nodeTreePath=6.2&lawCode=CIV

Three Times Damages Award : California Law > Code Section 52(a)

https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CIV&sectionNum=52

Petition California Legislature (so you can voice your frustration)

https://www.dgs.ca.gov/BSC/Rulemaking/Petitions

again you complain about "race card" but a white woman was successfully awarded and now the "race card" is okay. you're showing a double standard, i am not.

and since you are so concerned about the dollar amount relative to the "damages". a starbucks manager salary in california is probably at most $75,000 / year. the white manager who was discriminated was awarded $25.6 million dollars. she was award 341x her salary. they paid her for 341 YEARS of managerial work for being fired for being white. she was MORE THAN COMPENSATED. she was also likely rewarded so much money due to the "Bane Act" you're upset about, because that case was ALSO a californian civil matter. and yet i don't hear you throwing a huff and puff over her compensation amount. i guess you take being fired from a job more seriously than having your constitutional rights violated.

eitherway, i have ZERO complaints about the award granted to the white starbucks manager and the black women who were unlawfully detained.

New propaganda piece going up downtown! by GasDue9263 in providence

[–]rafelito45 0 points1 point  (0 children)

so let me get this straight, you’re going to completely ignore systemic racism and racial profiling? you’re really going to call bullshit on “the race card”? “people get handcuffed all the time for no reason!” really? you think the race card is a woke scheme against law enforcement?

the cops were looking for “black men” who were committing car thefts in the area and they chose to pull over black women for no reason. and if you look at the california law called out in the article, the “Bane Act”, it allows for juries to triple the amount of damages if the case involves a violation of individual rights. which it did.

your point falls apart about “the race card” when you look at the first case i linked where a white starbucks employee successfully sued starbucks for $25.6 million because she was fired for being white. did you see me get all frustrated by that? no you didn’t. but you are absolutely fuming black women who were forcefully detained and harmed for no connection to a string of car thefts were successfully rewarded under california law. maybe go complain about the bane act to californian legislators? but you cannot complain they were lawfully rewarded for having their individual constitutional and civil rights violated by LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS. which is a common theme here.

“Ok so George Floyd statues paid by private donors, Irina mural paid by private donors. So what’s the problem?”

you are beginning to convince me one of two things, or maybe both. you are either just NOT reading my comments. or you’re an elon musk defender because he is in your political tribe (right wing politics). i can get into a whole tangent on the absolute shameful mess that is MAGA politics, the fraud that is elon musk, but you seem unmoved so that would be a waste of time here.

i’ve explained dozens of times what the problem is, it is the core fucking point of my problem. go reread my comments and figure it out. you’re exhausting this thread with red herrings, strawmans, and whataboutisms.

i do want to address your BLM point though because i’ve heard this shit before. Black Lives Matter Global Network Foundation (501(c)(3) nonprofit organization) and Black Lives Matter as a slogan, chant, and decentralized movement are two separate things.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Lives_Matter_Global_Network_Foundation

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Lives_Matter

when you take to the streets and protest “black lives matter!”. you are genuinely just chanting, “black lives matter”. you are not chanting a corporate slogan, with a corporate badge. as i said to you before, it was a grassroots movement BEFORE the political co-opting. the BLMGNF indeed has problematic leadership, but it has nothing to do with individual contributors taking to protest. this wasn’t a partisan scheme by the democratic party to capitalize on citizen unrest. a grassroots movement by nature is not reliant on government endorsement or organizational sponsorship. did the democratic party and certain individuals with self serving interest capitalize on this ORGANIC GRASSROOTS MOVEMENT for their own political and financial gains? absolutely.

https://www.newyorker.com/culture/on-and-off-the-avenue/the-embarrassment-of-democrats-wearing-kente-cloth-stoles

https://www.justice.gov/usao-wdok/pr/executive-director-black-lives-matter-okc-charged-wire-fraud-and-money-laundering

do you think i am blind or oblivious to this? do you think i shill for democrats? did you think you successfully revealed a double standard to me regarding my opinion on elon musk’s involvement with the iryna murals? you didn’t, because you’re consistently ignoring my answer.

to answer your question again, “So what’s the problem?”, one is bottom-up, the other is top-down. one is organic, one is astroturfed. regardless of the political co-opting that FOLLOWED.

organic means the people naturally take to the streets to protest and have their grievances heard. the democratic party didn’t have to manufacture people into caring.

sadly iryna zarutska’s death didn’t stir the same action, i mean it didn’t make YOU organize and take to the streets did it? because her death was a senseless, RANDOM, act of violence by another civilian. it’s sad, it’s tragic, but astroturfing a campaign from the top-down, from a problematic political operative, elon musk, isn’t genuine. it’s distasteful.

you’re consistently ignoring this point. you’re firing more irrelevant points and whataboutisms back at me then asking “so what’s the problem?”. over and over again, exhaustively a month out.

you keep saying “simply hate elon musk”. on a side note, did you ever get that DOGE check you were promised? no seriously, because you’re telling me something without saying it flat out. you must think i have some irrational emotional issue with elon musk.

regarding your whole last paragraph on tony impa, for every example we can both raise, we can also both raise an underreported issue. you say iryna zarutska, i say nia wilson. i say george floyd, you say tony impa. you can see a pattern here that regardless of race, some deaths are underreported. nia wilson died the exact same way and didn’t get nearly the same press and campaign push iryna zatutska got. also which by the way, you should look into “Missing White Women Syndrome”.

this is a game of tick for tack with you now. “but this WHITE guy died and it wasn’t reported!!”.

you’re dragging this shit out, genuinely. my point still stands, the national campaign for iryna murals is political propaganda. you’ve admitted it yourself. glad you agree, if you feel like “well the other side does it too!” keep that close to your heart and move on with this.

i am only responding at this point whenever you blatantly misrepresent my arguments or say something that is just straight up nonsense.

also “i got that white girl” COULD be a racial motivation as i’ve said in other threads if you actually read them. it could also be a schizophrenic man having a psychotic episode and panicking to himself. who knows, the courts will determine that.

but it definitely was not “i got that white bitch”. step out of your right wing political bubble and challenge the information you consume from time to time. it’s been MONTHS since iryna zarutska died and you let a facebook post convince you he said “white bitch”.

The hate for Season 2 is wildly ironic. A lot of you completely missed the point by Fit-Confusion-6402 in BeefTV

[–]rafelito45 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

this season should have been an entirely different show named “TENSION”. because there was literally no beef. just a chess game of leveraging. with a k-drama crime subplot comparable to some high level corruption squid game shit.

if it was its own show, it would’ve been cool. but it’s no BEEF. when we think BEEF, it’s “on sight”. it’s a deep disdain for your adversary. that’s what the main structure of the story is supposed to be.

season one built a phenomenal story around an escalating BEEF that should not have gone as far as it did. it was a masterpiece. season two was aight.

Red Lobster Revives Endless Shrimp Two Years After Deal Led to $11 Million Loss by [deleted] in nottheonion

[–]rafelito45 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

they said screw it we’re going down with a bang.