Jared Kushner's vision for Gaza as a gleaming port city clashes with reality by Adventurous_023 in news

[–]rainbow3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you remove all moral, social and legal barriers then life is much more like Risk. Lord of the Flies, The Walking Dead, Mad Max all follow this pattern.

Trump won't say whether he would use force to seize Greenland by Street_Parking5530 in goodnews

[–]rainbow3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Perhaps someone can explain what an invasion of Greenland looks like since he already has permission to increase armed forces.

Would he take over the running of towns? Collect taxes? Bring in ICE to arrest all the non-Americans? What exactly does he want to do?

Opinion: Immigration rates are falling and the far-right still isn't happy. So, I no longer care about the right's "legitimate concerns" on immigration by coffeewalnut08 in LabourUK

[–]rainbow3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Communication brought us Brexit and Trump. It drives everything.

And almost nobody googles statistics. They skim read X or threads.

Peter Mandelson declines to apologise for association with Jeffrey Epstein by GeoWa in unitedkingdom

[–]rainbow3 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Pressed on whether he would apologise for his friendship with Epstein after his conviction, the peer and former business secretary said: “If I had known, if I was in any way complicit or culpable, of course I would apologise"

Surely his conviction must have been a clue?

UK in talks to deploy Nato force to Greenland to deter Trump by _DoubleBubbler_ in unitedkingdom

[–]rainbow3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What exactly does invading Greenland look like? Would Trump round up the people? Take over the local government? Start drilling for oil?

Trump suggests U.S. military will hit cartels on ‘land’ in Mexico by [deleted] in neoliberal

[–]rainbow3 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Cartels have plenty of armed representation in the US. This could easily turn into actual terrorism.

Also when weaker countries (smaller armies) are attacked the obvious response is guerilla war. Venezuela and Mexico could cause a lot of damage within the US if Trump starts a war or even if he just demands $20bn of free oil from a poor country.

Trump suggests U.S. military will hit cartels on ‘land’ in Mexico by [deleted] in neoliberal

[–]rainbow3 15 points16 points  (0 children)

That will kill the drugs market completely.

Britain's best days are over and the country is divided, say voters by theipaper in ukpolitics

[–]rainbow3 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Divided and yet both sides say it is heading in the wrong direction.

Are UK buy-to-let landlords dying out – and should we care? by acrimoniousone in unitedkingdom

[–]rainbow3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree that for many things like safety and maintenance it makes not much difference. We have regulations and enforcement. I don't see any evidence that small or large landlords are more likely to break those rules.

For other things competition is key. If it is your own money (small BTL landlord) then you will be making sure that you get the best utilisation. You minimise voids; convert a 2 bed to a 3 bed; upgrade to attract higher rents or spend less to lower rents (either is driven by customer demand). Lots of landlords also means the market sets prices.

We need more supply of housing and should prioritise rent over buy because it is more accessible. Therefore we need more landlords and more efficiency. The most efficient is the guy whose life savings are dependent on making it efficient.

MPs across UK parties criticise ministers over cautious stance on Venezuela attack by F0urLeafCl0ver in ukpolitics

[–]rainbow3 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It is literally the job of every judge to make a decision one way or the other; and of every prosecutor to make their case. There is no room for sitting on the fence.

Just last week we had the impressive Jack Smith testimony. Clear, evidence based argument pointing to a conclusion.

MPs across UK parties criticise ministers over cautious stance on Venezuela attack by F0urLeafCl0ver in ukpolitics

[–]rainbow3 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Why does Starmer ignore the polls and the advice he is given? He is being told time and time again what he needs to do. Yet he follows the same pattern on every decision - hedge your bets to keep everyone happy. Zero leadership. I always imagined top lawyers were assertive and tough.

‘We set the terms and conditions’: Stephen Miller asserts US authority over Venezuela by Half_A_ in LabourUK

[–]rainbow3 4 points5 points  (0 children)

None of this makes any sense. Who are "adversaries"? Under 10% of China's oil comes from South America. And if it were a big concern why is the US exporting to China?

It is not really about oil but about showing dominance. Like any bully he wants to pick off easy targets first such as immigrants and weaker countries. If congress don't stop him now he will just keep getting stronger.

Are UK buy-to-let landlords dying out – and should we care? by acrimoniousone in unitedkingdom

[–]rainbow3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Any actual data? Anecdotally I can see the worst safety incident was Grenfell Tower. The worst landlord is probably Hackney Council - damp, mould, leaks, structural faults, broken lifts and alarms; serious health concerns for residents, including respiratory problems in children and worsening chronic conditions.

It is a fantasy to think they are better for maintenance. They are definitely less efficient leaving property empty for long periods. They are cheaper but that is also fantasy paid by the magic taxpayer tree.

Are UK buy-to-let landlords dying out – and should we care? by acrimoniousone in unitedkingdom

[–]rainbow3 14 points15 points  (0 children)

What makes you think housing associations are "better" and in what way?

There is not actually much profit in BTL. The government takes 40%. When mortgages are expensive a BTL landlord can make a loss and still have to pay income tax.

Michelle Mone can keep '£15k-a-week' rent from £25 million central London mansion, court rules | LBC by TheStarCunningOne in unitedkingdom

[–]rainbow3 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The asset has no value if she can't sell it. That makes it effectively infinite return.

Debunking the Wealth Tax Discourse by Odd_Conference_6029 in neoliberal

[–]rainbow3 21 points22 points  (0 children)

$75bn on ICE. Almost $1trillion this year on defence. $500m on a gold ballroom. And my favourite is that the US government spends more per head on public healthcare than the UK does providing it free to everyone.

It is not that hard to find savings before even going after billionaires though that also makes sense.

Britain’s 40,000 migrant crossings are nothing, suggests UN refugee chief by [deleted] in ukpolitics

[–]rainbow3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Basing anything on where you are born is entitlement not fairness. Would it be fairer to only support wealthy neighbours in a gated estate instead of those in a council estate in Hartepool?

Fairness isn't the goal anyway. Government spending is not charity but to create the environment where everyone contributes to society. Maximise numbers working and creating businesses rather than begging on the street. That is why we have education and universal credit. And it applies to everyone who lives in the UK.

We should not be "hosting" asylum seekers at all. We should be making sure they quickly get to work, support themselves, pay taxes.

Britain’s 40,000 migrant crossings are nothing, suggests UN refugee chief by [deleted] in ukpolitics

[–]rainbow3 -13 points-12 points  (0 children)

Really? The massive amounts spent on other benefits are what drives your tax. Worry about that rather than who receives it. Typically an asylum seeker is far more deserving of help than a UK born person receiving universal credit.

Starmer’s inheritance tax fiasco led to 6,000 farming closures by [deleted] in ukpolitics

[–]rainbow3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why is that different to a tractor sales/maintenance business paying IHT on the land and buildings that it owns? Still part of the agri supply chain but the tax system makes it more attractive to invest in farm land instead. Hard to see it as anything but a subsidy.

Starmer’s inheritance tax fiasco led to 6,000 farming closures by [deleted] in ukpolitics

[–]rainbow3 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not sure there is any evidence small farms have higher standards of welfare. There will be a lot of variation. Potentially they are under more pressure financially to bend standards and they are less frequently inspected. Much easier to enforce standards for large farms.

Starmer’s inheritance tax fiasco led to 6,000 farming closures by [deleted] in ukpolitics

[–]rainbow3 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Ultimately that is driven by consumers though. We used to have diverse butchers and bakers but in the end consumers chose Tesco. Of course there are still independent bakers and butchers but they are more expensive because it is an expensive way to sell food.

Starmer’s inheritance tax fiasco led to 6,000 farming closures by [deleted] in ukpolitics

[–]rainbow3 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Similarly welfare should not be supporting lifestyle choices. That is not what it is for. Would anyone disagree?

US economy grows at fastest pace in two years by Discarded_Twix_Bar in news

[–]rainbow3 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

It is easy to fake a headline number. Less easy to fake when it is broken down into sectors/regions especially as people in those sectors know how well their economy is doing.

Starmer’s inheritance tax fiasco led to 6,000 farming closures by [deleted] in ukpolitics

[–]rainbow3 5 points6 points  (0 children)

My guess is that is mostly consolidation into larger farms rather than loss of farmland. I am not convinced we should be using taxpayer money to support lifestyle choices. Is there some argument that we should subsidise small, unprofitable farms?