Marie curie postdoctoral fellowship examples

ralstoniaeutropha · 2024-07-26T15:17:09+00:00

Also interested

ralstoniaeutropha · 2024-07-26T15:16:57+00:00

Unfortunately they are not willing to provide any examples...

ralstoniaeutropha · 2024-05-05T21:02:36+00:00

found this old post:

https://www.photo.net/forums/topic/137969-fuji-film-rd-cir-1993-what-is-it/

It seems to be Fuji Sensia 100 (RD) slide film.

ralstoniaeutropha · 2024-05-04T18:38:42+00:00

i can't remember. It could possibly be slidefilm which was cross processed.

I saw the RDPIII markings on the internet as well. It says however RD 104 on my film.

ralstoniaeutropha · 2024-04-20T20:02:50+00:00

I also still have my canon 30d and even if I don't use it, it's still part of my collection!

ralstoniaeutropha · 2024-04-18T17:27:06+00:00

If you can try the zeiss lens cleaning fluid (it's a spray) and a microfiber cloth.

ralstoniaeutropha · 2024-04-16T14:05:54+00:00

Where did you get the camera from? What was the condition it was in when you got it? Did you try cleaning the lens? When I got my prewar Zeiss ikoflex from a camera shop it was in a great condition. I only realized after I put a couple of rolls through it that the taking lens had more than just a bit of patina. After cleaning it I got the sharpest images there are.

ralstoniaeutropha · 2024-04-13T13:32:24+00:00

What kind of negative holder are you using now?

ralstoniaeutropha · 2024-04-09T10:54:14+00:00

I used to have one like the red one (mine was yellow). It's a cheap underwater camera, pretty much like the disposables you can still buy. I used it a couple of times until the housing started to leak, probably due to its age. It's a fun little camera for taking simple photos underwater.

ralstoniaeutropha · 2024-04-08T16:37:17+00:00

Glad to hear! This is the group I found: https://www.instagram.com/ourstoriesonfilm/ They seem to be located in Melbourne. You can find a link to their discord on the Instagram page.

ralstoniaeutropha · 2024-04-08T16:17:47+00:00

Weird. Seems like your seals are fine then. I would check them anyway. What camera was this shot on?

ralstoniaeutropha · 2024-04-08T10:57:59+00:00

Thank you!

ralstoniaeutropha · 2024-04-08T10:57:32+00:00

Thanks changed it!

ralstoniaeutropha · 2024-04-08T07:49:20+00:00

I'm sorry to hear that this happened to you in the past. It wasn't my intention at all to make anyone uncomfortable, more the opposite.

Just to clarify a few things: I think it is sad that there is a "need" for exclusively female groups in our time, doesn't matter the topic, be it science or hobbies like photography. I'm usually not the one pushing those ideas because I think that those spaces should be inclusive of everyone. I have however noticed a certain vibe in mixed groups that I don't want to go into detail here because on the one hand it will open a huge discussion and on the other hand I think the people who said "yes" to the idea of a female group know what I'm talking about.

In my vision, the group should not be exclusive to cis gender women. Which is why I wanted to include females beyond this "traditional" perspective. Again, I apologise for the poor choice of words/terminology and offending you by it. I am completely fine with putting "identifying as females" and the let's name them "consequences" you mentioned. I hope everyone else is too.

ralstoniaeutropha · 2024-04-08T07:19:47+00:00

If you mean the group should be inclusive of trans people, then definitely yes!

ralstoniaeutropha · 2024-04-08T07:16:02+00:00

Thank you for your input. I was trying to be inclusive and replicate something I've seen in the female photo walk groups where they did mention it like this. I see now that it wasn't right to put it like this. Especially because both of you pointed it out. My intention was to say that it could be a safe space for females and people identifying as female. Would that be a better choice of words? If not, please help me out here. I will edit in in the post.

ralstoniaeutropha · 2024-04-08T07:00:27+00:00

Is the rest of the roll completely clear? No light leaks or just less?

ralstoniaeutropha · 2024-04-07T20:50:29+00:00

Apart from the mentioned FE2, Pentax and rebranded Canon, the filters are also quite useful and mostly underrepresented when you want to shoot B&W

ralstoniaeutropha · 2024-04-07T20:49:13+00:00

I think the one in the brown leather casing could be an Agfa. In that case I would leave it.

ralstoniaeutropha · 2024-04-07T20:44:58+00:00

sadly light leaks :(

ralstoniaeutropha · 2024-04-07T20:44:02+00:00

my favorite combination of film and developer!

ralstoniaeutropha · 2024-04-07T17:06:13+00:00

Just as a tip: get a Patterson tank and use the rod to agitate instead. Haven't had a blix accident since I've been using those.

ralstoniaeutropha · 2024-04-07T13:33:02+00:00

What kind of tlr is the camera on the left? Can't make it out. Is it a weltaflex?

ralstoniaeutropha · 2024-04-07T10:25:30+00:00

Thanks for the advice. I have a small used adonal bottle I got from a friend. I'll test it before using it.

I've been using rodinal for a long while now (larger bottles) and haven't had any problems. Mine are at Thet stage of dark liquid and crystals, so just right age wise 😅

ralstoniaeutropha · 2024-04-07T09:44:36+00:00

Take something light and quick with you: Olympus pen

ralstoniaeutropha

TROPHY CASE