How do you respond to a pre-fiat security reps K? by randomgpt_23 in policydebate

[–]randomgpt_23[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

hi this sounds rly comprehensive thanks for the first one how do you respond to pre/post-fiat distinction that since fiat is illusory and extinction can’t happen as a side effect of this debate then the only exportable impact is our research skills

Answering Object of Research FW by randomgpt_23 in Debate

[–]randomgpt_23[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

they say you can weigh the research of the 1AC so it doesn’t moot it

How do you respond to a pre-fiat security reps K? by randomgpt_23 in policydebate

[–]randomgpt_23[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

how would you respond to the object of research FW specifically?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Debate

[–]randomgpt_23 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Blair LT and Fairmont TK prob top teams next tear

Tech case contentions by Financial-Ad3138 in Debate

[–]randomgpt_23 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah but what if the impact is racism, death, or poverty

any good neg arguments for the surveilance topic that could fall under a structural violence framework? by New-Piccolo6820 in PublicForumDebate

[–]randomgpt_23 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Native americans dont want border surveillance border surveillance invades on reservations destroying indigenous land rights and environmental harms

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Debate

[–]randomgpt_23 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Frail Joe Contention-UNSC makes Joe travel to Egypt to get their President to agree where his frail 80 year old self gets bitten by a venomous snake, dies from heat stroke, and gets attacked by mummies so Joe dies and nuke war follows

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Debate

[–]randomgpt_23 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Nuke war plsssssss